This is to be consistent with StringSet and ultimately with the standard
library's associative container insert function.
This lead to updating SmallSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update SmallPtrSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update all the existing users of those functions...
llvm-svn: 222334
As it turns out, the capture tracker named CaptureBefore used by AA, and now
available via the PointerMayBeCapturedBefore function, would have been
more-aptly named CapturedBeforeOrAt, because it considers captures at the
instruction provided. This is not always what one wants, and it is difficult to
get the strictly-before behavior given only the current interface. This adds an
additional parameter which controls whether or not you want to include
captures at the provided instruction. The default is not to include the
instruction provided, so that 'Before' matches its name.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 213582
There were two generally-useful CaptureTracker classes defined in LLVM: the
simple tracker defined in CaptureTracking (and made available via the
PointerMayBeCaptured utility function), and the CapturesBefore tracker
available only inside of AA. This change moves the CapturesBefore tracker into
CaptureTracking, generalizes it slightly (by adding a ReturnCaptures
parameter), and makes it generally available via a PointerMayBeCapturedBefore
utility function.
This logic will be needed, for example, to perform noalias function parameter
attribute inference.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 213519
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
llvm-svn: 203364
to ensure we don't mess up any of the overrides. Necessary for cleaning
up the Value use iterators and enabling range-based traversing of use
lists.
llvm-svn: 202958
The heuristic was added to avoid spending too much compile time A specially
crafted test case (PR17461, PR16474) with many uses on a select or bitcast
instruction can still trigger the slow case. Add a check for that case.
This only affects compile time, don't have a good way to test it.
llvm-svn: 191896
captured. This allows the tracker to look at the specific use, which may be
especially interesting for function calls.
Use this to fix 'nocapture' deduction in FunctionAttrs. The existing one does
not iterate until a fixpoint and does not guarantee that it produces the same
result regardless of iteration order. The new implementation builds up a graph
of how arguments are passed from function to function, and uses a bottom-up walk
on the argument-SCCs to assign nocapture. This gets us nocapture more often, and
does so rather efficiently and independent of iteration order.
llvm-svn: 147327
and stores capture) to permit the caller to see each capture point and decide
whether to continue looking.
Use this inside memdep to do an analysis that basicaa won't do. This lets us
solve another devirtualization case, fixing PR8908!
llvm-svn: 144580
examines; fall back to a conservative answer if there are
more. This works around some several compile time problems
resulting from BasicAliasAnalysis calling PointerMayBeCaptured.
The value has been chosen arbitrarily.
This fixes rdar://7438917 and may partially address PR5708.
llvm-svn: 90905
same object to be a non-capture; Duncan pointed out a way that such
a comparison could be a capture.
Make the rule that considers a comparison against null more specific,
and only consider noalias return values compared against null. This
still supports test/Transforms/GVN/nonescaping-malloc.ll, and is not
susceptible to the problem Duncan pointed out with noalias arguments.
llvm-svn: 89468
because if the results from getUnderlyingObject match, the values must
be from the same underlying object, even if we don't know what that
object is.
llvm-svn: 89434
careful about crazy methods of capturing pointers using comparisons.
Comparisons of identified objects with null in the default address
space are not captures. And, comparisons of two pointers within the
same identified object are not captures.
llvm-svn: 89421
if it is not ultimately captured. Teach BasicAliasAnalysis that a
local object address which does not escape and is never stored does
not alias with a value resulting from a load.
llvm-svn: 89398
bits captured, but the pointer marked nocapture. In fact
I now recall that this problem is why only readnone functions
returning void were considered before! However keep a small
fix that was also in r70876: a readnone function returning
void can result in bits being captured if it unwinds, so
test for this.
llvm-svn: 71168
only capture their arguments by returning them or
throwing an exception or not based on the argument
value. Patch essentially by Frits van Bommel.
llvm-svn: 70876
doing very similar pointer capture analysis.
Factor out the common logic. The new version
is from FunctionAttrs since it does a better
job than the version in BasicAliasAnalysis
llvm-svn: 62461
David Blaikie