scope, when no other indication is provided that the user intended to declare a
function rather than a variable.
Remove some false positives from the existing 'parentheses disambiguated as a
function' warning by suppressing it when the declaration is marked as 'typedef'
or 'extern'.
Add a new warning group -Wvexing-parse containing both of these warnings.
The new warning is enabled by default; despite a number of false positives (and
one bug) in clang's test-suite, I have only found genuine bugs with it when
running it over a significant quantity of real C++ code.
llvm-svn: 147599
members of class templates so that their values can be used in ICEs. This
required reverting r105465, to get such instantiated members to be included in
serialized ASTs.
llvm-svn: 147023
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
Necessary to parse Microsoft ATL code.
Example:
int array[] = {
0,
__if_exists(CLASS::Type) {2, }
3
};
will declare an array of 2 or 3 elements depending on if CLASS::Type exists or not.
llvm-svn: 146447
methods) to bool. E.g.
void foo() {}
if (f) { ... // <- Warns here.
}
Only applies to non-weak functions, and does not apply if the function address
is taken explicitly with the addr-of operator.
llvm-svn: 145849
Basically typo correction will try to offer a correction instead of looking into type dependent base classes.
I found this problem while parsing Microsoft ATL code with clang.
llvm-svn: 145772
Basically we have to look into the parent *lexical* DeclContext for friend functions at class scope. That's because calling GetParent() return the namespace or file DeclContext.
This fixes all remaining cases of "Unqualified lookup into dependent bases of class templates" when parsing MFC code with clang.
llvm-svn: 145127
semantics and defaults as the corresponding g++ arguments. The historical g++
argument -ftemplate-depth-N is kept for compatibility, but modern g++ versions
no longer document that option.
Add -cc1 argument -fconstexpr-depth N to implement the corresponding
functionality.
The -ftemplate-depth=N part of this fixes PR9890.
llvm-svn: 145045
This is a little bit tricky because during default argument instantiation the CurContext points to a CXXMethodDecl but we can't use the keyword this or have an implicit member call generated.
This fixes 2 errors when parsing MFC code with clang.
llvm-svn: 144881
which they do. This avoids all of the default argument promotions that
we (1) don't want, and (2) undo during that custom type checking, and
makes sure that we don't run into trouble during template
instantiation. Fixes PR11320.
llvm-svn: 144110
the injected-class-name of a class (or class template) to the
declaration that results from substituting the given template
arguments. Previously, we would actually perform a substitution into
the injected-class-name type and then retrieve the resulting
declaration. However, in certain, rare circumstances involving
deeply-nested member templates, we would get the wrong substitution
arguments.
This new approach just matches up the declaration with a declaration
that's part of the current context (or one of its parents), which will
either be an instantiation (during template instantiation) or the
declaration itself (during the definition of the template). This is
both more efficient (we're avoiding a substitution) and more correct
(we can't get the template arguments wrong in the member-template
case).
Fixes <rdar://problem/9676205>.
Reinstated, now that we have the fix in r143967.
llvm-svn: 143968
the injected-class-name of a class (or class template) to the
declaration that results from substituting the given template
arguments. Previously, we would actually perform a substitution into
the injected-class-name type and then retrieve the resulting
declaration. However, in certain, rare circumstances involving
deeply-nested member templates, we would get the wrong substitution
arguments.
This new approach just matches up the declaration with a declaration
that's part of the current context (or one of its parents), which will
either be an instantiation (during template instantiation) or the
declaration itself (during the definition of the template). This is
both more efficient (we're avoiding a substitution) and more correct
(we can't get the template arguments wrong in the member-template
case).
Fixes <rdar://problem/9676205>.
llvm-svn: 143551
does not match any declaration in the class (or class template), be
sure to mark it as invalid. Fixes PR10924 / <rdar://problem/10119422>.
llvm-svn: 143504
that it retains source location information for the type. Aside from
general goodness (being able to walk the types described in that
information), we now have a proper representation for dependent
delegating constructors. Fixes PR10457 (for real).
llvm-svn: 143410
Microsoft __if_exists/__if_not_exists statement. Also note that we
weren't traversing DeclarationNameInfo *at all* within the
RecursiveASTVisitor, which would be rather fatal for variadic
templates.
llvm-svn: 142906
statements. As noted in the documentation for the AST node, the
semantics of __if_exists/__if_not_exists are somewhat different from
the way Visual C++ implements them, because our parsed-template
representation can't accommodate VC++ semantics without serious
contortions. Hopefully this implementation is "good enough".
llvm-svn: 142901
analysis to separate dependent names from non-dependent names. For
dependent names, we'll behave differently from Visual C++:
- For __if_exists/__if_not_exists at class scope, we'll just warn
and then ignore them.
- For __if_exists/__if_not_exists in statements, we'll treat the
inner statement as a compound statement, which we only instantiate
in templates where the dependent name (after instantiation)
exists. This behavior is different from VC++, but it's as close as
we can get without encroaching ridiculousness.
The latter part (dependent statements) is not yet implemented.
llvm-svn: 142864
be sure to consider all of the possible lookup results. We were
assert()'ing (but behaving correctly) for unresolved values. Fixes
PR11134 / <rdar://problem/10290422>.
llvm-svn: 142652
actually just has an extraneous 'template<>' header, strip off the
'template<>' header and treat it as a normal friend tag. Fixes PR10660
/ <rdar://problem/9958322>.
llvm-svn: 142587
the right namespace in C++11 mode. Teach the code to prefer the 'must be in
precisely this namespace' diagnostic whenever that's true, and fix a defect
which resulted in the -Wc++11-compat warning in C++98 mode sometimes being
omitted.
llvm-svn: 142329
part of template argument deduction is ill-formed, we mark it as
invalid and treat it as a deduction failure. If we happen to find that
specialization again, treat it as a deduction failure rather than
silently building a call to the declaration.
Fixes PR11117, a marvelous bug where deduction failed after creating
an invalid specialization, causing overload resolution to pick a
different candidate. Then we performed a similar overload resolution
later, and happily picked the invalid specialization to
call... resulting in a silent link failure.
llvm-svn: 141809
We'd also like for "C++11" or "c++11" to be used for the warning
groups, but without removing the old warning flags. Patches welcome;
I've run out of time to work on this today.
llvm-svn: 141801
and DefaultFunctionArrayLvalueConversion. To prevent
significant regression for should-this-be-a-call fixits,
and to repair some such regression from the introduction of
bound member placeholders, make those placeholder checks
try to build calls appropriately. Harden the build-a-call
logic while we're at it.
llvm-svn: 141738
We had an extension which allowed const static class members of floating-point type to have in-class initializers, 'as a C++0x extension'. However, C++0x does not allow this. The extension has been kept, and extended to all literal types in C++0x mode (with a fixit to add the 'constexpr' specifier).
llvm-svn: 140801
Much to everyone's surprise, the default constructor for TypeResult produces
an instance with Invalid == false. This seems like a decision we may want to
revisit.
llvm-svn: 138601
even when overloaded and user-defined. These operators are both more
valuable to warn on (due to likely typos) and extremely unlikely to be
reasonable for use to trigger side-effects.
llvm-svn: 137823
-Wunused was a mistake. It resulted in duplicate warnings and lots of
other hacks. Instead, this should be a special sub-category to
-Wunused-value, much like -Wunused-result is.
Moved to -Wunused-comparison, moved the implementation to piggy back on
the -Wunused-value implementation instead of rolling its own, different
mechanism for catching all of the "interesting" statements.
I like the unused-value mechanism for this better, but its currently
missing several top-level statements. For now, I've FIXME-ed out those
test cases. I'll enhance the generic infrastructure to catch these
statements in a subsequent patch.
This patch also removes the cast-to-void fixit hint. This hint isn't
available on any of the other -Wunused-value diagnostics, and if we want
it to be, we should add it generically rather than in one specific case.
llvm-svn: 137822
Richard Smith