The division expansions in AMDGPUCodeGenPrepare can't be relied on for
correctness, since they punt to later optimization and possibly
legalization in some cases. We still need a way to be able to write
tests for the legalizer versions of the expansion. This is mostly for
GlobalISel, since the expected optimzations is expecting aren't
implemented.
The interaction with the flag to expand 64-bit division in the IR is
pretty confusing, but these flags have different purposes.
Try out using combine definition rules.
This really should be a post-legalizer combine, but the combiner pass
is currently pre-legalize. Most of the target combines are really
post-legalize, so we should probably move the pass.
Use intermediate instructions, unlike with buffer stores. This is
necessary because of the need to have an internal way to distinguish
between signed and unsigned extloads. This introduces some duplication
and near duplication with the buffer store selection path. The store
handling should maybe be moved into legalization to match and
eliminate the duplication.
The current implementation assumes there is an instruction associated
with the transform, but this is not the case for
timm/TargetConstant/immarg values. These transforms should directly
operate on a specific MachineOperand in the source
instruction. TableGen would assert if you attempted to define an
equivalent GISDNodeXFormEquiv using timm when it failed to find the
instruction matcher.
Specially recognize SDNodeXForms on timm, and pass the operand index
to the render function.
Ideally this would be a separate render function type that looks like
void renderFoo(MachineInstrBuilder, const MachineOperand&), but this
proved to be somewhat mechanically painful. Add an optional operand
index which will only be passed if the transform should only look at
the one source operand.
Theoretically it would also be possible to only ever pass the
MachineOperand, and the existing renderers would check the parent. I
think that would be somewhat ugly for the standard usage which may
want to inspect other operands, and I also think MachineOperand should
eventually not carry a pointer to the parent instruction.
Use it in one sample pattern. This isn't a great example, since the
transform exists to satisfy DAG type constraints. This could also be
avoided by just changing the MachineInstr's arbitrary choice of
operand type from i16 to i32. Other patterns have nontrivial uses, but
this serves as the simplest example.
One flaw this still has is if you try to use an SDNodeXForm defined
for imm, but the source pattern uses timm, you still see the "Failed
to lookup instruction" assert. However, there is now a way to avoid
it.
This doesn't enable any new imports yet, but moves the fmed patterns
from failing on this to hitting the "complex suboperand referenced
more than once" limitation in tablegen.
Custom lower this to a target instruction with the merge operands. I
think it might be better to directly select this and emit a
REG_SEQUENCE, but this would be more work since it would require
splitting the tablegen patterns for these cases from the other
atomics.
Allows targets to introduce regbankselectable
pseudo-instructions. Currently the closet feature to this is an
intrinsic. However this requires creating a public intrinsic
declaration. This litters the public intrinsic namespace with
operations we don't necessarily want to expose to IR producers, and
would rather leave as private to the backend.
Use a new instruction bit. A previous attempt tried to keep using enum
value ranges, but it turned into a mess.
llvm-svn: 373937
Now that the patterns use the new PatFrag address space support, the
only blocker to importing most load patterns is the addressing mode
complex patterns.
llvm-svn: 366237
Also works around tablegen defect in selecting add with unused carry,
but if we have to manually select GEP, might as well handle add
manually.
llvm-svn: 364806
There are several things broken, but at least emit the right thing for
gfx9.
The import of the pattern with the unused carry out seems to not
work. Needs a special class for clamp, because OperandWithDefaultOps
doesn't really work.
llvm-svn: 364804
We have done some predicate and feature refactoring lately but
did not upstream it. This is to sync.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60292
llvm-svn: 357791
Matt Arsenault