Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368944
Summary:
This takes this logic out of the Tweak class, and simplifies the signature of
the function where the main logic is.
The goal is to make it easier to turn into a loop like:
for (current = N; current and current->parent are both expr; current = current->parent)
if (suitable(current))
return current;
return null;
Reviewers: SureYeaah
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65333
llvm-svn: 368590
Summary:
I split out the "extract parent instead of this" logic from the "this isn't
worth extracting" logic (now in eligibleForExtraction()), because I found it
hard to reason about.
While here, handle overloaded as well as builtin assignment operators.
Also this uncovered a bug in getCallExpr() which I fixed.
Reviewers: SureYeaah
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65337
llvm-svn: 368500
Summary:
The API provided by refactoring lib doesn't provide enough flexibility
to get clangd's rename to behave as we expect. Instead, we replace it
with the low-level rename functions, which give us more control.
Bonus:
- performance, previously we visit the TU to find all occurrences,
now we just visit top-level decls from main file;
- fix a bug where we wrongly filter out the main file replacement due to the
different relative/absolute file path;
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65936
llvm-svn: 368429
Summary:
Whitespace and comments are a clear bugfix: selecting some
comments/space near a statement doesn't mean you're selecting the
surrounding block.
Semicolons are less obvious, but for similar reasons: these tokens
aren't actually claimed by any AST node (usually), so an AST-based model
like SelectionTree shouldn't take them into account.
Callers may still sometimes care about semis of course:
- when the selection is an expr with a non-expr parent, selection of
the semicolon indicates intent to select the statement.
- when a statement with a trailing semi is selected, we need to know
its range to ensure it can be removed.
SelectionTree may or may not play a role here, but these are separate questions
from its core function of describing which AST nodes were selected.
The mechanism here is the TokenBuffer from syntax-trees. We use it in a
fairly low-level way (just to get boundaries of raw spelled tokens). The
actual mapping of AST nodes to coordinates continues to use the (fairly
mature) SourceLocation based logic. TokenBuffer/Syntax trees
don't currently offer an alternative to getFileRange(), I think.
Reviewers: SureYeaah, kadircet
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits, ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65486
llvm-svn: 367453
Summary:
These aren't formally subexpressions in C++, in this case + is left-associative.
However informally +, *, etc are usually (mathematically) associative and users
consider these subexpressions.
We detect these and in simple cases support extracting the partial expression.
As well as builtin associative operators, we assume that overloads of them
are associative and support those too.
Reviewers: SureYeaah
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65139
llvm-svn: 367121
Summary:
After rL366893, the annoate tweak is not activated when we select the
whole file (the commonAncestor is TUDecl but we intend to return null).
This patch fixes this, and also avoid traversing the TUDecl.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65210
llvm-svn: 366996
Summary:
Previously TranslationUnitDecl would never be selected.
This means root() is never null, and returns a reference.
commonAncestor() is in principle never null also, but returning TUDecl
here requires tweaks to be careful not to traverse it (this was already
possible when selecting multiple top-level decls, and there are associated bugs!)
Instead, never allow commonAncestor() to return TUDecl, return null instead.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65101
llvm-svn: 366893
Summary:
- For now, we don't trigger in any case if it's an empty selection
- Fixed unittests
Reviewers: kadircet, sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64912
llvm-svn: 366451
Summary: Previously, we ran the prepare, even for the tweaks that are disabled.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64565
llvm-svn: 365882
Add a tweak for clangd to replace an auto keyword to the deduced type.
This way a user can declare something with auto and then have the
IDE/clangd replace auto with whatever type clangd thinks it is. In case
of long/complext types this makes is reduces writing effort for the
user.
The functionality is similar to the hover over the auto keyword.
Example (from the header):
```
/// Before:
/// auto x = Something();
/// ^^^^
/// After:
/// MyClass x = Something();
/// ^^^^^^^
```
Patch by kuhnel! (Christian Kühnel)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62855
llvm-svn: 365792
Summary:
GetTypePtr requires that the type should not be null, otherwise we hit
an assertion, we should use getTypePtrOrNull instead.
Reviewers: sammccall, SureYeaah
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64556
llvm-svn: 365763
Summary:
- Added extraction to a dummy variable
- using auto for the dummy variable type for now
- Works on a function scope
- Adding braces to create a compound statement not supported yet
- added unit tests
Reviewers: sammccall, kadircet
Subscribers: mgorny, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63773
llvm-svn: 365453
Summary:
Previously, when we rename a macro, we get an error message of "there is
no symbol found".
This patch improves the message of this case (as we don't support macros).
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63922
llvm-svn: 364735
Summary:
Failing case:
```
#include "foo.h"
void fo^o() {}
```
getRenameDecl() returns the decl of the symbol under the cursor (which is
in the current main file), instead, we use the canonical decl to determine
whether a symbol is declared in #included header.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63872
llvm-svn: 364537
Summary:
Also fix a small bug -- the extra argument "-xc++" doesn't overwrite the
language if the argument is present after the file name in the compiler
command.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63759
llvm-svn: 364392
Summary:
Previously, we performed rename for all kinds of symbols (local, global).
This patch narrows the scope by only renaming symbols not being used
outside of the main file (with index asisitance). Renaming global
symbols is not supported at the moment (return an error).
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63426
llvm-svn: 364283
Summary:
This introduces a few new concepts:
- tweaks have an Intent (they don't all advertise as refactorings)
- tweaks may produce messages (for ShowMessage notification). Generalized
Replacements -> Effect.
- tweaks (and other features) may be hidden (clangd -hidden-features flag).
We may choose to promote these one day. I'm not sure they're worth their own
feature flags though.
Verified it in vim-clangd (not yet open source), curious if the UI is ok in VSCode.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62538
llvm-svn: 363680
Enough to build the clangd binaries, but this is still missing build
files for:
- fuzzer
- indexer
- index/dex/dexp
- benchmarks
- xpc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59899
llvm-svn: 357182
Summary:
This reduces the per-check implementation burden and redundant work.
It also makes checks range-aware by default (treating the commonAncestor
as if it were a point selection should be good baseline behavior).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57570
llvm-svn: 352876
Summary:
The code tweaks are an implementation of mini-refactorings exposed
via the LSP code actions. They run in two stages:
- Stage 1. Decides whether the action is available to the user and
collects all the information required to finish the action.
Should be cheap, since this will run over all the actions known to
clangd on each textDocument/codeAction request from the client.
- Stage 2. Uses information from stage 1 to produce the actual edits
that the code action should perform. This stage can be expensive and
will only run if the user chooses to perform the specified action in
the UI.
One unfortunate consequence of this change is increased latency of
processing the textDocument/codeAction requests, which now wait for an
AST. However, we cannot avoid this with what we have available in the LSP
today.
Reviewers: kadircet, ioeric, hokein, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgrang, mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56267
llvm-svn: 352494
Jonas Devlieghere