to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
As noted by Adrian on llvm-commits, PrintHTMLEscaped and PrintEscaped in
StringExtras did not conform to the LLVM coding guidelines. This commit
rectifies that.
llvm-svn: 333669
Summary: Existing version doesn't work on Windows as it always prints 0.00.
Reviewers: Dor1s
Reviewed By: Dor1s
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42767
llvm-svn: 323923
We've worked around bugs in the frontend by ignoring the count from
wrapped segments when a line has at least one region entry segment.
Those frontend bugs are now fixed, so it's time to regenerate the
checked-in covmapping files and remove the workaround.
llvm-svn: 317761
llvm-cov tends to highlight too many regions because its policy is to
highlight all region entry segments. This can look confusing to users:
not all region entry segments are interesting and deserve highlighting.
Emitting these highlights only when the region count differs from the
line count is a more user-friendly policy.
llvm-svn: 316109
Instead of copying around the wrapped segment and the list of line
segments, just pass a reference to a LineCoverageStats object. This
simplifies the interface. It also makes an upcoming change to suppress
distracting highlights possible.
llvm-svn: 316108
llvm-cov typically doesn't highlight gap segments, but it should if the
gap occurs after an uncovered region in order to preserve continuity.
llvm-svn: 316107
There were two copies of the logic needed to construct a line stats
object for each line in a range: this patch brings it down to one. In
the future, this will make it easier for IDE clients to display coverage
in-line in source editors. To do that, we just need to move the new
LineCoverageIterator class to libCoverage.
llvm-svn: 315789
Before this change using any of the -name*= command line options with an output
directory would result in a single file (functions.txt/functions.html)
containing the coverage for those specific functions. Now you get the same
directory structure as when not using any -name*= options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38280
llvm-svn: 314396
Before this change using any of the -name*= command line options with an output
directory would result in a single file (functions.txt/functions.html)
containing the coverage for those specific functions. Now you get the same
directory structure as when not using any -name*= options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38280
llvm-svn: 314310
After clang started emitting deferred regions (r312818), llvm-cov has
had a hard time picking reasonable line execuction counts. There have
been one or two generic improvements in this area (e.g r310012), but
line counts can still report coverage for whitespace instead of code
(llvm.org/PR34612).
To fix the problem:
* Introduce a new region kind so that frontends can explicitly label
gap areas.
This is done by changing the encoding of the columnEnd field of
MappingRegion. This doesn't substantially increase binary size, and
makes it easy to maintain backwards-compatibility.
* Don't set the line count to a count from a gap area, unless the count
comes from a wrapped segment.
* Don't highlight gap areas as uncovered.
Fixes llvm.org/PR34612.
llvm-svn: 313597
There's a bug in the way the line and region summary objects are merged.
It would have been less likely to occur if those objects kept some data
private.
llvm-svn: 313416
Region coverage is difficult to explain without going deep into how
coverage is implemented. Instantiation coverage is easier to explain,
but probably not useful in most cases (templates don't exist in C, and
most C++ code contains relatively few templates).
This patch adds the options "-show-region-summary" and
"-show-instantiation-summary" to allow hiding those columns.
"-show-instantiation-summary" is turned off by default.
llvm-svn: 312969
Make sure that the text and html emitters always emit the same set of
region markers, and avoid emitting redundant markers for line segments
which don't end on the line they start on.
This is related to D35925, and depends on D36014
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36020
llvm-svn: 312813
Files which don't contain any functions are likely useless; don't
include them in the main table. Put the links at the bottom of the
page, in case someone wants to figure out coverage for code inside
a macro.
Not sure if this is the best solution, but it seems like an
improvement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36298
llvm-svn: 310518
This commit makes llvm-cov avoid showing 0% (0/0) coverage for things
like file function coverage, etc. in reports and HTML output. This can happen
for files like headers that have macros but no functions. This commit makes
llvm-cov report - (0/0) instead.
rdar://29246480
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26615
llvm-svn: 287539
When we load coverage data from multiple objects, we don't have a way to
attribute a source object to a function record. Printing out the object
filename next to the source filename is already not very useful: soon,
it'll actually become misleading. Stop printing out the filename now.
llvm-svn: 285043
We used to append filenames into a vector of std::string, and then
append a reference to each string into a separate vector. This made it
easier to work with the getUniqueSourceFiles API. But it's buggy.
std::string has a small-string optimization, so you can't expect to
capture a reference to one if you're copying it into a growing vector.
Add a test that triggers this invalid reference to std::string scenario,
and kill the issue with fire by just using ArrayRef<std::string>
everywhere.
llvm-svn: 282281
These are distinct statistics which are useful to look at separately.
Example: say you have a template function "foo" with 5 instantiations
and only 3 of them are covered. Then this contributes (1/1) to the total
function coverage and (3/5) to the total instantiation coverage. I.e,
the old "Function Coverage" column has been renamed to "Instantiation
Coverage", and the new "Function Coverage" aggregates information from
the various instantiations of a function.
One benefit of making this switch is that the Line and Region coverage
columns will start making sense. Let's continue the example and assume
that the 5 instantiations of "foo" cover {2, 4, 6, 8, 10} out of 10
lines respectively. The new line coverage for "foo" is (10/10), not
(30/50). The old scenario got confusing because we'd report that there
were more lines in a file than what was actually possible.
llvm-svn: 281875
Copying in the full text of the function doesn't help at all when we
already know that it's never executed. Just say that it's unexecuted --
the relevant source text has already been printed.
llvm-svn: 281589
The llvm-cov version information will be useful to the user when comparing the code coverage across different versions of llvm-cov. This patch provides the llvm-cov version information in the generated coverage report.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24457
llvm-svn: 281321
These asserts are making tests fragile. The renderer does not enter an
invalid state when they fail, however, it may spit out a garbled
coverage report because the source text no longer matches the provided
coverage mapping.
Another follow-up to r281072.
llvm-svn: 281076
llvm-cov writes out an index file in '-output-dir' mode, albeit not a
very informative one. Try to fix that by using the CoverageReport API to
include some basic summary information in the index file.
llvm-svn: 281011
The text and html coverage views take different approaches to emitting
highlighted regions. That's because this problem is easier in the text
view: there's no need to worry about escaping text or adding tooltip
content to a highlighted snippet.
Unfortunately, the html view didn't get region highlighting quite right.
This patch fixes the situation, bringing parity between the two views.
llvm-svn: 280981
In r279628, we made SourceCoverageView list the binary associated with a
view and started adding labels (e.g "Source: foo" or "Function: bar") to
everything. Condense this information a bit to unclutter reports.
llvm-svn: 280896
This patch provides easy navigation to find the zero count lines, especially useful when the source file is very large.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23277
llvm-svn: 280739
Chandler Carruth