CFG wass built in non-deterministic order due to the fact that indirect
goto labels' declarations (LabelDecl's) are stored in the llvm::SmallSet
container. LabelDecl's are pointers, whose order is not deterministic,
and llvm::SmallSet sorts them by their non-deterministic addresses after
"small" container is exceeded. This leads to non-deterministic processing
of the elements of the container.
The fix is to use llvm::SmallSetVector that was designed to have
deterministic iteration order.
Patch by Ilya Palachev!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40073
llvm-svn: 318750
This patch introduces a class that can help to build tools that require cross
translation unit facilities. This class allows function definitions to be loaded
from external AST files based on an index. In order to use this functionality an
index is required. The index format is a flat text file but it might be
replaced with a different solution in the near future. USRs are used as names to
look up the functions definitions. This class also does caching to avoid
redundant loading of AST files.
Right now only function defnitions can be loaded using this API because this is
what the in progress cross translation unit feature of the Static Analyzer
requires. In to future this might be extended to classes, types etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34512
llvm-svn: 313975
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
Based on a patch by Vassil Vassilev, which was based on a patch by Bernd
Schmidt, which was based on a patch by Reid Kleckner!
This is a re-commit of r310401, which was reverted in r310464 due to ARM
failures (which should now be fixed).
llvm-svn: 310983
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
llvm-svn: 310401
Summary:
The ASTImporter should import CXX method overrides from the source context
when it imports a method decl.
Reviewers: spyffe, rsmith, doug.gregor
Reviewed By: spyffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34371
llvm-svn: 305850
Summary:
If the first parameter of the function is the ImplicitParamDecl, codegen
automatically marks it as an implicit argument with `this` or `self`
pointer. Added internal kind of the ImplicitParamDecl to separate
'this', 'self', 'vtt' and other implicit parameters from other kind of
parameters.
Reviewers: rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33735
llvm-svn: 305075
ASTImporter has some bugs when it's importing types
that themselves come from an ExternalASTSource. This
is exposed particularly in the behavior when
comparing complete TagDecls with forward
declarations. This patch does several things:
- Adds a test case making sure that conflicting
forward-declarations are resolved correctly;
- Extends the clang-import-test harness to test
two-level importing, so that we make sure we
complete types when necessary; and
- Fixes a few bugs I found this way. Failure to
complete types was one; however, I also discovered
that complete RecordDecls aren't properly added to
the redecls chain for existing forward
declarations.
llvm-svn: 302975
Create a header and impl file for the structural equivalence context.
This is to allow other users outside clang importer. NFCI
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31777
rdar://problem/30167717
llvm-svn: 301604
When the SearchName is already calculated we should use that for the lookup.
Patch by Peter Szecsi!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30877
llvm-svn: 299354
Sema holds the current FPOptions which is adjusted by 'pragma STDC
FP_CONTRACT'. This then gets propagated into expression nodes as they are
built.
This encapsulates FPOptions so that this propagation happens opaquely rather
than directly with the fp_contractable on/off bit. This allows controlled
transitioning of fp_contractable to a ternary value (off, on, fast). It will
also allow adding more fast-math flags later.
This is toward moving fp-contraction=fast from an LLVM TargetOption to a
FastMathFlag in order to fix PR25721.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31166
llvm-svn: 298877
This enhances the AST to keep track of locations of the names in those ObjC property attributes, and reports them for indexing.
Patch by Nathan Hawes!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30907
llvm-svn: 297972
Essentially, as a base class constructor does not construct virtual bases, such
a constructor for an abstract class does not need the corresponding base class
construction to be valid, and likewise for destructors.
This creates an awkward situation: clang will sometimes generate references to
the complete object and deleting destructors for an abstract class (it puts
them in the construction vtable for a derived class). But we can't generate a
"correct" version of these because we can't generate references to base class
constructors any more (if they're template specializations, say, we might not
have instantiated them and can't assume any other TU will emit a copy).
Fortunately, we don't need to, since no correct program can ever invoke them,
so instead emit symbols that just trap.
We should stop emitting references to these symbols, but still need to emit
definitions for compatibility.
llvm-svn: 296275
We model deduction-guides as functions with a new kind of name that identifies
the template whose deduction they guide; the bulk of this patch is adding the
new name kind. This gives us a clean way to attach an extensible list of guides
to a class template in a way that doesn't require any special handling in AST
files etc (and we're going to need these functions we come to performing
deduction).
llvm-svn: 294266
This change adds a new type node, DeducedTemplateSpecializationType, to
represent a type template name that has been used as a type. This is modeled
around AutoType, and shares a common base class for representing a deduced
placeholder type.
We allow deduced class template types in a few more places than the standard
does: in conditions and for-range-declarators, and in new-type-ids. This is
consistent with GCC and with discussion on the core reflector. This patch
does not yet support deduced class template types being named in typename
specifiers.
llvm-svn: 293207
* Support template partial specialization
* Avoid infinite recursion in IsStructurallyEquivalent for TemplateArgument with implementing IsStructurallyEquivalent for TemplateName
llvm-svn: 292776
Fixes a crash in modules where the template class decl becomes the most recent
decl in the redeclaration chain and forcing the template instantiator try to
instantiate the friend declaration, rather than the template definition.
In practice, A::list<int> produces a TemplateSpecializationType
A::__1::list<int, allocator<type-parameter-0-0> >' failing to replace to
subsitute the default argument to allocator<int>.
Kudos Richard Smith (D28399).
llvm-svn: 291753
copy constructors of classes with array members, instead using
ArrayInitLoopExpr to represent the initialization loop.
This exposed a bug in the static analyzer where it was unable to differentiate
between zero-initialized and unknown array values, which has also been fixed
here.
llvm-svn: 289618
expansions by calling getSpellingLoc(). That's great in most cases, but for
macros defined in the '<built-in>' source file, the source file is invalid
and does not import correctly, causing an assertion failure (the assertion
is Invalid SLocOffset or bad function choice).
A more reliable way to avoid this is to use getFileLoc(), which does not
return built-in locations. This avoids the crash but still preserves valid
source locations.
I've added a testcase that covers the previously crashing scenario.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26054
llvm-svn: 286144
We also need to add ObjCTypeParamTypeLoc. ObjCTypeParamType supports the
representation of "T <protocol>" where T is a type parameter. Before this,
we use TypedefType to represent the type parameter for ObjC.
ObjCTypeParamType has "ObjCTypeParamDecl *OTPDecl" and it extends from
ObjCProtocolQualifiers. It is a non-canonical type and is canonicalized
to the underlying type with the protocol qualifiers.
rdar://24619481
rdar://25060179
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23079
llvm-svn: 281355
Summary:
Space for storing the //constraint-expression// of the
//requires-clause// associated with a `TemplateParameterList` is
arranged by taking a bit out of the `NumParams` field for the purpose
of determining whether there is a //requires-clause// or not, and by
adding to the trailing objects tied to the `TemplateParameterList`. An
accessor is provided.
An appropriate argument is supplied to `TemplateParameterList::Create`
at the various call sites.
Serialization changes will addressed as the Concepts implementation
becomes more solid.
Drive-by fix:
This change also replaces the custom
`FixedSizeTemplateParameterListStorage` implementation with one that
follows the interface provided by `llvm::TrailingObjects`.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, faisalv, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, nwilson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19322
llvm-svn: 276069
distinct anonymous structs remain distinct despite having similar layout.
This is already ensured by distinguishing based on their placement in the parent
struct, using the function `findAnonymousStructOrUnionIndex`.
The problem is that this function only handles anonymous structs, like
```
class Foo { struct { int a; } }
```
and not untagged structs like
```
class Foo { struct { int a; } var; }
```
Both need to be handled, and this patch fixes that. The test case ensures that this functionality doesn't regress.
Thanks to Manman Ren for review.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22270
llvm-svn: 275460
Also added named casts and propagation of "implicit" to fix the LLDB testsuite.
This is a fixed commit of r269546, which was reverted by r269575.
Thanks to Aleksei Sidorin for review and advice.
llvm-svn: 269693
IdentifierInfos are assigned builtin IDs during parsing, but Idents.get() does
not do that work. So the ASTImporter needs to additionally set the builtin ID
for the newly-created IdentifierInfo. This patch does that.
Currently ASTMerge tests only check syntax and the ASTMatchers don't check for
builtin IDs, so this is tricky to test, but LLDB will have a test for this.
llvm-svn: 269553
Aleksei Sidorin