We currently use target_link_libraries without an explicit scope
specifier (INTERFACE, PRIVATE or PUBLIC) when linking executables.
Dependencies added in this way apply to both the target and its
dependencies, i.e. they become part of the executable's link interface
and are transitive.
Transitive dependencies generally don't make sense for executables,
since you wouldn't normally be linking against an executable. This also
causes issues for generating install export files when using
LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS. For example, clang has a lot of LLVM
library dependencies, which are currently added as interface
dependencies. If clang is in the distribution components but the LLVM
libraries it depends on aren't (which is a perfectly legitimate use case
if the LLVM libraries are being built static and there are therefore no
run-time dependencies on them), CMake will complain about the LLVM
libraries not being in export set when attempting to generate the
install export file for clang. This is reasonable behavior on CMake's
part, and the right thing is for LLVM's build system to explicitly use
PRIVATE dependencies for executables.
Unfortunately, CMake doesn't allow you to mix and match the keyword and
non-keyword target_link_libraries signatures for a single target; i.e.,
if a single call to target_link_libraries for a particular target uses
one of the INTERFACE, PRIVATE, or PUBLIC keywords, all other calls must
also be updated to use those keywords. This means we must do this change
in a single shot. I also fully expect to have missed some instances; I
tested by enabling all the projects in the monorepo (except dragonegg),
and configuring both with and without shared libraries, on both Darwin
and Linux, but I'm planning to rely on the buildbots for other
configurations (since it should be pretty easy to fix those).
Even after this change, we still have a lot of target_link_libraries
calls that don't specify a scope keyword, mostly for shared libraries.
I'm thinking about addressing those in a follow-up, but that's a
separate change IMO.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40823
llvm-svn: 319840
An installation rule for the executable with the correct component is
already created by `add_clang_tool`, so the rule in this file is
redundant. Correct the installation component for the Python scripts so
that they also get installed by `install-clang-tidy`.
llvm-svn: 317155
Summary:
This is part 1 of 3 of a series of changes to improve Objective-C
linting in clang-tidy.
This introduces a new clang-tidy module, `objc`, specifically for
Objective-C / Objective-C++ checks.
The module is currently empty; D39142 adds the first check.
Test Plan: `ninja check-clang-tools`
Patch by Ben Hamilton!
Reviewers: hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: Wizard, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39188
llvm-svn: 316643
Created new module bugprone and placed the check in that.
Finds memset() calls with potential mistakes in their arguments.
Replaces and extends the existing google-runtime-memset-zero-length check.
Cases covered:
* Fill value is a character '0'. Integer 0 might have been intended.
* Fill value is out of char range and gets truncated.
* Byte count is zero. Potentially swapped with the fill value argument.
Patch by: Reka Nikolett Kovacs
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32700
llvm-svn: 308020
Summary:
A common source of security bugs is code that opens a file descriptors without using the O_CLOEXEC flag. (Without that flag, an opened sensitive file would remain open across a fork+exec to a lower-privileged SELinux domain, leaking that sensitive data.).
Add a new Android module and one checks in clang-tidy.
-- open(), openat(), and open64() should include O_CLOEXEC in their flags argument. [android-file-open-flag]
Links to part2 and part3:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33745https://reviews.llvm.org/D33747
Reviewers: chh, alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: alexfh, hokein
Subscribers: jbcoe, joerg, malcolm.parsons, Eugene.Zelenko, srhines, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits, krytarowski
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33304
llvm-svn: 306165
Use add_clang_tool rather than add_clang_executable to support
clang-tidy as a distribution component.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32815
llvm-svn: 302688
Currently the ClangTidyMain.cpp fails to link against shared LLVM/Clang libraries
due to the missing symbol:
clang::tooling::operator<(clang::tooling::Replacement const&,
clang::tooling::Replacement const&);
This patch fixes the issue by correctly linking clangToolingCore which contains
the definition.
llvm-svn: 300115
This commit renames all of the safety functionality to be hicpp, adds an appropriate LICENSE.TXT, and updates the documentation accordingly.
llvm-svn: 298229
This check verifies if buffer type and MPI (Message Passing Interface)
datatype pairs match. All MPI datatypes defined by the MPI standard (3.1)
are verified by this check. User defined typedefs, custom MPI datatypes and
null pointer constants are skipped, in the course of verification.
Instructions on how to apply the check can be found at:
https://github.com/0ax1/MPI-Checker/tree/master/examples
Patch by Alexander Droste!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21962
llvm-svn: 277516
Summary:
This check verifies if buffer type and MPI (Message Passing Interface)
datatype pairs match. All MPI datatypes defined by the MPI standard (3.1)
are verified by this check. User defined typedefs, custom MPI datatypes and
null pointer constants are skipped, in the course of verification.
Instructions on how to apply the check can be found at: https://github.com/0ax1/MPI-Checker/tree/master/examples
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Projects: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Alexander Droste!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21962
llvm-svn: 276640
Currently, to be able to process a source file including e.g. stddef.h with
clang-tidy, one has to build both clang-tidy and the clang-headers target.
Since stddef.h is needed for virtually any source file, let clang-tidy depend
on clang-headers, so that it Just Works after it has been built.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D22046
llvm-svn: 274751
Summary:
The patch adds a new ClangTidy check that detects when expensive-to-copy types are unnecessarily copy initialized from a const reference that has the same or are larger scope than the copy.
It currently only detects this when the copied variable is const qualified. But this will be extended to non const variables if they are only used in a const fashion.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Patch by Felix Berger!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15623
llvm-svn: 256632
Scripts are installed in same location as clang-fromat ones, so I think will be good idea to not create dedicated directory.
I checked this patch on my own build on RHEL 6.
Please check it in if it's OK, because I don't have SVN write access.
I think will be good idea to backport this patch to 3.7 release branch.
Probably same should be done for configure build.
Patch by Eugene Zelenko!
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12700
llvm-svn: 247890
Summary:
Register readability checks in a separate module. Renamed the checks
and test file names accordingly.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: curdeius, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5936
llvm-svn: 220631
This is implemented in a way that the current static analyzer
architecture allows, in the future we might want to revisit this.
With this change static analyzer checks are available from clang-tidy
by specifying -checks=clang-analyzer-<name>.
This change also fixes the use of the compilation database to allow
clang-tidy to be used like any other clang tool.
llvm-svn: 194707
This is the first version of a possible clang-tidy architecture. The
purpose of clang-tidy is to detect errors in adhering to common coding
patterns, e.g. described in the LLVM Coding Standards.
This is still heavily in flux.
Review: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D884
llvm-svn: 187345
Shoaib Meenai