Our error recovery path may have made the class anonymous, and that has a pretty
disastrous impact on any attempt to parse a class body containing constructors.
llvm-svn: 169374
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
Among other differences, GCC accepts
typedef int IA[];
typedef int A10[10];
static A10 *f(void);
static IA *f(void);
void g(void) {
(void)sizeof(*f());
}
but clang used to reject it with:
invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'IA' (aka 'int []')
The intention of c99's 6.2.7 seems to be that we should use the composite type
and accept as gcc does.
Doing the type merging required some extra fixes:
* Use the type from the function type in initializations, even if an parameter
is available.
* Fix the merging of the noreturn attribute in function types.
* Make CodeGen handle the fact that an parameter type can be different from
the corresponding type in the function type.
llvm-svn: 168895
It brought bunch of (possibly false) warnings.
llvm/unittests/VMCore/PassManagerTest.cpp:60:22: warning: variable 'ID' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration]
char ModuleNDNM::ID=0;
^
llvm/unittests/VMCore/PassManagerTest.cpp:86:22: warning: variable 'ID' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration]
char ModuleNDM2::ID=0;
^
llvm/unittests/VMCore/PassManagerTest.cpp:106:21: warning: variable 'ID' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration]
char ModuleDNM::ID=0;
^
llvm/unittests/VMCore/PassManagerTest.cpp:217:16: warning: variable 'initcount' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration]
int LPass::initcount=0;
^
llvm/unittests/VMCore/PassManagerTest.cpp:218:16: warning: variable 'fincount' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration]
int LPass::fincount=0;
^
llvm/unittests/VMCore/PassManagerTest.cpp:259:16: warning: variable 'inited' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration]
int BPass::inited=0;
^
llvm/unittests/VMCore/PassManagerTest.cpp:260:16: warning: variable 'fin' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration]
int BPass::fin=0;
^
llvm/unittests/VMCore/PassManagerTest.cpp:283:24: warning: variable 'ID' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration]
char OnTheFlyTest::ID=0;
^
8 warnings generated.
llvm-svn: 168549
"clang -cc1 -fsyntax-only" on the preprocessed output of
#define M extern int a;
#define M2 M M
#define M4 M2 M2
#define M8 M4 M4
#define M16 M8 M8
#define M32 M16 M16
#define M64 M32 M32
#define M128 M64 M64
#define M256 M128 M128
#define M512 M256 M256
#define M1024 M512 M512
#define M2048 M1024 M1024
#define M4096 M2048 M2048
#define M8192 M4096 M4096
#define M16384 M8192 M8192
M16384
goes from 2.994s to 1.416s. GCC is at 0.022s, so we still have a long way to go.
llvm-svn: 168519
Separate out the notions of 'has a trivial special member' and 'has a
non-trivial special member', and use them appropriately. These are not
opposites of one another (there might be no special member, or in C++11 there
might be a trivial one and a non-trivial one). The CXXRecordDecl predicates
continue to produce incorrect results, but do so in fewer cases now, and
they document the cases where they might be wrong.
No functionality changes are intended here (they will come when the predicates
start producing the right answers...).
llvm-svn: 168119
This corrects the mangling and linkage of classes (& their member functions) in
cases like this:
struct foo {
struct {
void func() { ... }
} x;
};
we were accidentally giving this nested unnamed struct 'no' linkage where it
should've had the linkage of the outer class. The mangling was incorrecty too,
mangling as TU-wide unnamed type mangling of $_X rather than class-scoped
mangling of UtX_.
This also fixes -Wunused-member-function which would incorrectly diagnose
'func' as unused due to it having no linkage & thus appearing to be TU-local
when in fact it might be correctly used in another TU.
Similar mangling should be applied to function local classes in similar cases
but I've deferred that for a subsequent patch.
Review/discussion by Richard Smith, John McCall, & especially Eli Friedman.
llvm-svn: 167906
applied to CXXRecordDecls, where functions with that return type will
inherit the warn_unused_result attribute.
Also includes a tiny fix (with no discernable behavior change for
existing code) to re-sync AttributeDeclKind enum and
err_attribute_wrong_decl_type with warn_attribute_wrong_decl_type since
the enum is used with both diagnostic messages to chose the correct
description.
llvm-svn: 167783
The problem is as follows: C++11 has contexts which are not
potentially-evaluated, and yet in which we are required or encouraged to
perform constant evaluation. In such contexts, we are not permitted to
implicitly define special member functions for literal types, therefore
we cannot evalaute those constant expressions.
Punt on this in one more context for now by skipping checking constexpr
variable initializers if they occur in dependent contexts.
llvm-svn: 166956
whether the initializer is value-dependent rather than whether we are in a
dependent context. This allows us to detect some errors sooner, and fixes a
crash-on-invalid if a dependent type leaks out to a non-dependent context in
error recovery.
llvm-svn: 166898
might have been used in constant expressions, rather than suppressing it for
variables which are const. The important thing here is that such variables
can have their values used without actually being marked as 'used'.
llvm-svn: 166896
defined without a previous declaration. This is similar to
-Wmissing-prototypes, but for variables instead of functions.
Patch by Ed Schouten.
llvm-svn: 166498
since it also has an implicit exception specification. Downgrade the error to
an extwarn, since at least for operator delete, system headers like to declare
it as 'noexcept' whereas the implicit definition does not have an explicit
exception specification. Move the exception specification for user-declared
'operator delete' functions from the type-as-written into the type, to reflect
reality and to allow us to detect whether there was an implicit exception spec
or not.
llvm-svn: 166372
Also, unify ObjCShouldCallSuperDealloc and ObjCShouldCallSuperFinalize.
The two have identical behavior and will never be active at the same time.
There's one last simplification now, which is that if we see a call to
[super foo] and we are currently in a method named 'foo', we will
/unconditionally/ clear the ObjCShouldCallSuper flag, rather than check
first to see if we're in a method where calling super is required. There's
no reason to pay the extra lookup price here.
llvm-svn: 166285
When suggesting "foo::bar" as a correction for "fob::bar" we mistakenly
replaced only "bar" with "foo::bar" producing "fob::foo::bar" which was broken.
This corrects that replacement in as many places as I could find & provides
test cases for all those cases I could find a test case for. There are a couple
that don't seem to be reachable (one looks entirely dead, the other just
doesn't seem to ever get called with a namespace to namespace change).
Review by Richard Smith ( http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D57 ).
llvm-svn: 165817
For GNU attributes, instead of reusing attribute source
location for the scope location, use SourceLocation() since
GNU attributes don not have scope tokens.
llvm-svn: 165234
-Allow Sema to do more processing on the initial Expr before checking it.
-Remove the special conditions in HandleExpr()
-Move the code so that only one call site is needed.
-Removed the function from Sema and only call it locally.
-Warn on potentially evaluated reference variables, not just casts to r-values.
-Update tests.
llvm-svn: 164951
The motivating example:
if (self.weakProp)
use(self.weakProp);
As with any non-atomic test-then-use, it is possible a weak property to be
non-nil at the 'if', but be deallocated by the time it is used. The correct
way to write this example is as follows:
id tmp = self.weakProp;
if (tmp)
use(tmp);
The warning is controlled by -Warc-repeated-use-of-receiver, and uses the
property name and base to determine if the same property on the same object
is being accessed multiple times. In cases where the base is more
complicated than just a single Decl (e.g. 'foo.bar.weakProp'), it picks a
Decl for some degree of uniquing and reports the problem under a subflag,
-Warc-maybe-repeated-use-of-receiver. This gives a way to tune the
aggressiveness of the warning for a particular project.
The warning is not on by default because it is not flow-sensitive and thus
may have a higher-than-acceptable rate of false positives, though it is
less noisy than -Wreceiver-is-weak. On the other hand, it will not warn
about some cases that may be legitimate issues that -Wreceiver-is-weak
will catch, and it does not attempt to reason about methods returning weak
values.
Even though this is not a real "analysis-based" check I've put the bug
emission code in AnalysisBasedWarnings for two reasons: (1) to run on
every kind of code body (function, method, block, or lambda), and (2) to
suggest that it may be enhanced by flow-sensitive analysis in the future.
The second (smaller) half of this work is to extend it to weak locals
and weak ivars. This should use most of the same infrastructure.
Part of <rdar://problem/12280249>
llvm-svn: 164854
This makes the wording more informative, and consistent with the other
warnings about uninitialized variables.
Also, me and David who reviewed this couldn't figure out why we would
need to do a lookup to get the name of the variable; so just print the
name directly.
llvm-svn: 164366
This is some really old code (took me a while to find the test cases) & the
diagnostic text is slightly incorrect (it should really only apply to
re/declarations/, redefinitions are an error regardless of whether the types
match). Not sure if anyone cares about it, though.
For now this just makes the diagnostic more clear in less obvious cases where
the type of a declaration might not be explicitly written (eg: because it
uses decltype)
llvm-svn: 164313
is no compelling argument that this is a generally useful warning,
and imposes a strong stylistic argument on code beyond what it was
intended to find warnings in.
llvm-svn: 164083
Specifically, this should warn:
__block block_t a = ^{ a(); };
Furthermore, this case which previously warned now does not, since the value
of 'b' is captured before the assignment occurs:
block_t b; // not __block
b = ^{ b(); };
(This will of course warn under -Wuninitialized, as before.)
<rdar://problem/11015883>
llvm-svn: 163962
Argyrios Kyrtzidis