The port originally had special patterns for extload, mapping them to the
same instructions as sextload. It seemed neater to have patterns that
match "an extension that is allowed to be signed" and "an extension that
is allowed to be unsigned".
This was originally meant to be a clean-up, but it does improve the handling
of promoted integers a little, as shown by args-06.ll.
llvm-svn: 190777
The main complication here is that TM and TMY (the memory forms) set
CC differently from the register forms. When the tested bits contain
some 0s and some 1s, the register forms set CC to 1 or 2 based on the
value the uppermost bit. The memory forms instead set CC to 1
regardless of the uppermost bit.
Until now, I've tried to make it so that a branch never tests for an
impossible CC value. E.g. NR only sets CC to 0 or 1, so branches on the
result will only test for 0 or 1. Originally I'd tried to do the same
thing for TM and TMY by using custom matching code in ISelDAGToDAG.
That ended up being very ugly though, and would have meant duplicating
some of the chain checks that the common isel code does.
I've therefore gone for the simpler alternative of adding an extra
operand to the TM DAG opcode to say whether a memory form would be OK.
This means that the inverse of a "TM;JE" is "TM;JNE" rather than the
more precise "TM;JNLE", just like the inverse of "TMLL;JE" is "TMLL;JNE".
I suppose that's arguably less confusing though...
llvm-svn: 190400
The architecture has many comparison instructions, including some that
extend one of the operands. The signed comparison instructions use sign
extensions and the unsigned comparison instructions use zero extensions.
In cases where we had a free choice between signed or unsigned comparisons,
we were trying to decide at lowering time which would best fit the available
instructions, taking things like extension type into account. The code
to do that was getting increasingly hairy and was also making some bad
decisions. E.g. when comparing the result of two LLCs, it is better to use
CR rather than CLR, since CR can be fused with a branch while CLR can't.
This patch removes the lowering code and instead adds an operand to
integer comparisons to say whether signed comparison is required,
whether unsigned comparison is required, or whether either is OK.
We can then leave the choice of instruction up to the normal isel code.
llvm-svn: 190138
For now just handles simple comparisons of an ANDed value with zero.
The CC value provides enough information to do any comparison for a
2-bit mask, and some nonzero comparisons with more populated masks,
but that's all future work.
llvm-svn: 189469
Lengths up to a certain threshold (currently 6 * 256) use a series of MVCs.
Lengths above that threshold use a loop to handle X*256 bytes followed
by a single MVC to handle the excess (if any). This loop will also be
needed in future when support for variable lengths is added.
Because the same tablegen classes are used to define MVC and CLC,
the patch also has the side-effect of defining a pseudo loop instruction
for CLC. That instruction isn't used yet (and wouldn't be handled correctly
if it were). I'm planning to use it soon though.
llvm-svn: 189331
For now this matches the equivalent of (neg (abs ...)), which did hit a few
times in projects/test-suite. We should probably also match cases where
absolute-like selects are used with reversed arguments.
llvm-svn: 188671
This first cut is pretty conservative. The final argument register (R6)
is call-saved, so we would need to make sure that the R6 argument to a
sibling call is the same as the R6 argument to the calling function,
which seems worth keeping as a separate patch.
Saying that integer truncations are free means that we no longer
use the extending instructions LGF and LLGF for spills in int-conv-09.ll
and int-conv-10.ll. Instead we treat the registers as 64 bits wide and
truncate them to 32-bits where necessary. I think it's unlikely we'd
use LGF and LLGF for spills in other situations for the same reason,
so I'm removing the tests rather than replacing them. The associated
code is generic and applies to many more instructions than just
LGF and LLGF, so there is no corresponding code removal.
llvm-svn: 188669
System z branches have a mask to select which of the 4 CC values should
cause the branch to be taken. We can invert a branch by inverting the mask.
However, not all instructions can produce all 4 CC values, so inverting
the branch like this can lead to some oddities. For example, integer
comparisons only produce a CC of 0 (equal), 1 (less) or 2 (greater).
If an integer EQ is reversed to NE before instruction selection,
the branch will test for 1 or 2. If instead the branch is reversed
after instruction selection (by inverting the mask), it will test for
1, 2 or 3. Both are correct, but the second isn't really canonical.
This patch therefore keeps track of which CC values are possible
and uses this when inverting a mask.
Although this is mostly cosmestic, it fixes undefined behavior
for the CIJNLH in branch-08.ll. Another fix would have been
to mask out bit 0 when generating the fused compare and branch,
but the point of this patch is that we shouldn't need to do that
in the first place.
The patch also makes it easier to reuse CC results from other instructions.
llvm-svn: 187495
Fixes some cases where we were using full 64-bit division for (sdiv i32, i32)
and (sdiv i64, i32).
The "32" in "SDIVREM32" just refers to the second operand. The first operand
of all *DIVREM*s is a GR128.
llvm-svn: 185435
Add pseudo conditional store instructions, so that we use:
branch foo:
store
foo:
instead of:
load
branch foo:
move
foo:
store
z196 has real 32-bit and 64-bit conditional stores, but we don't use
any z196 instructions yet.
llvm-svn: 185065
Unlike most -- hopefully "all other", but I'm still checking -- memory
instructions we support, LOAD REVERSED and STORE REVERSED may access
the memory location several times. This means that they are not suitable
for volatile loads and stores.
This patch is a prerequisite for better atomic load and store support.
The same principle applies there: almost all memory instructions we
support are inherently atomic ("block concurrent"), but LOAD REVERSED
and STORE REVERSED are exceptions.
Other instructions continue to allow volatile operands. I will add
positive "allows volatile" tests at the same time as the "allows atomic
load or store" tests.
llvm-svn: 183002
This adds the actual lib/Target/SystemZ target files necessary to
implement the SystemZ target. Note that at this point, the target
cannot yet be built since the configure bits are missing. Those
will be provided shortly by a follow-on patch.
This version of the patch incorporates feedback from reviews by
Chris Lattner and Anton Korobeynikov. Thanks to all reviewers!
Patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 181203
Richard Sandiford