Group all synthetic symbols in the in single struct to match
the ELF linker.
This change is part of a larger change to add more linker
symbols such as `_end` and `_edata`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42866
llvm-svn: 324157
into a std::string so we don't run off the end of the array when
there is no nul byte in ProcessElfCore::parseLinuxNotes.
Found with ASAN testing.
<rdar://problem/37134319>
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42828
llvm-svn: 324156
Clang previously reported an empty union as having a unique object
representation. This was incorrect and was fixed in a recent Clang commit.
This patch fixes the libc++ tests.
llvm-svn: 324153
This is running pre-legalize, we should try to use target independent nodes. This will give the best opportunity for target independent optimizations.
llvm-svn: 324147
Without extra instructions and uses, swapMayExposeCSEOpportunities() would change
the icmp (as seen in the check lines), so we were not actually testing patterns
that should be handled by D41480.
llvm-svn: 324143
Summary:
Clang incorrectly reports empty unions as having a unique object representation. However, this is not correct since `sizeof(EmptyUnion) == 1` AKA it has 8 bits of padding. Therefore it should be treated the same as an empty struct and report `false`.
@erichkeane also suggested this fix should be merged into the 6.0 release branch, so the initial release of `__has_unique_object_representations` is as bug-free as possible.
Reviewers: erichkeane, rsmith, aaron.ballman, majnemer
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: cfe-commits, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42863
llvm-svn: 324134
libprotobuf-mutator accepts protobufs with missing fields, which means
clang-proto-fuzzer does as well. clang-proto-to-cxx should match this
behavior.
llvm-svn: 324132
Summary:
This is an alternative approach to D42014 after some
investigation by stephanemoore@ and myself.
Previously, the format parameter `BinPackParameters` controlled both
C function parameter list bin-packing and Objective-C protocol conformance
list bin-packing.
We found in the Google style, some teams were changing
`BinPackParameters` from its default (`true`) to `false` so they could
lay out Objective-C protocol conformance list items one-per-line
instead of bin-packing them into as few lines as possible.
To allow teams to use one-per-line Objective-C protocol lists without
changing bin-packing for other areas like C function parameter lists,
this diff introduces a new LibFormat parameter
`ObjCBinPackProtocolList` to control the behavior just for ObjC
protocol conformance lists.
The new parameter is an enum which defaults to `Auto` to keep the
previous behavior (delegating to `BinPackParameters`).
Depends On D42649
Test Plan: New tests added. make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: jolesiak, stephanemoore, djasper
Reviewed By: stephanemoore
Subscribers: Wizard, hokein, cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42650
llvm-svn: 324131
Turns out I misunderstood the flag behavior of PTEST because I read the documentation for KORTEST which is different than PTEST/KTEST and made a bad assumption.
Keep the test rename though cause that's useful.
llvm-svn: 324129
Summary:
Previously, Clang only emitted label names in assert builds.
However there is a CC1 option -discard-value-names that should have been used to control emission instead.
This patch removes the NDEBUG preprocessor block and instead allows LLVM to handle removing the names in accordance with the option.
Reviewers: erichkeane, aaron.ballman, majnemer
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42829
llvm-svn: 324127
The "sleep(5)" sometimes times out on our bots, causing the test to fail. Let's use pthread_join.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42862
llvm-svn: 324126
This commit cleans up the expression parser, using a new style:
- parse* functions now return Node pointers.
- The mangled name is now held in Db and accessed with look() and consume()
- LLVM coding style
This style is meant to avoid the 2 most common types of bugs in the
old demanger, namely misusing the Names stack (ie, calling back() on
empty) and going out of bounds on the mangled name. I also think it
makes the demangler a lot cleaner.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41887
llvm-svn: 324111
This starts adding dso_local to clang.
The hope is to eventually have TargetMachine::shouldAssumeDsoLocal go
away. My objective for now is to move enough of it to clang to remove
the need for the TargetMachine one to handle PIE copy relocations and
-fno-plt. With that it should then be easy to implement a
-fno-copy-reloc in clang.
This patch just adds the cases where we assume a symbol to be local
based on the file being compiled for an executable or a shared
library.
llvm-svn: 324107
Summary:
We should always be able to accept AVX512 registers and instructions in llvm-mc. The only subtarget mode that should be checked is 16-bit vs 32-bit vs 64-bit mode.
I've also removed all the mattr/mcpu lines from test RUN lines to be consistent with this. Most were due to AVX512, but a few were for other features.
Fixes PR36202
Reviewers: RKSimon, echristo, bkramer
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42824
llvm-svn: 324106
When trying to track down a different bug, we discovered
that calling __builtin_va_arg on a vec3f type caused
the SROA pass to issue a warning that there was an illegal
access.
Further research showed that the vec3f type is
alloca'ed as size '12', but the _builtin_va_arg code
on x86_64 was always loading this out of registers as
{double, double}. Thus, the 2nd store into the vec3f
was storing in bytes 12-15!
This patch alters the original implementation which always
assumed {double, double} to use the actual coerced type
instead, so the LLVM-IR generated is a load/GEP/store of
a <2 x float> and a float, rather than a double and a double.
Tests were added for all combinations I could think of that
would fit in 2 FP registers, and all work exactly as expected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42811
llvm-svn: 324098
Jason Molenda