The one difference between ObjCMethodDecl::getMethodFamily and Selector::getMethodFamily is that the former will do some additional sanity checking, and since CoreFoundation types don't look like Objective-C objects, an otherwise interesting method will get a method family of OMF_None. Future clients that use method families should consider how they want to handle CF types.
llvm-svn: 153000
The cocoa::deriveNamingConventions helper is just using method families anyway now, and the way RetainSummaryTemplate works means we're allocating an extra summary for every method with a relevant family.
Also, fix RetainSummaryTemplate to do the right thing w/r/t annotating an /existing/ summary. This was probably the real cause of <rdar://problem/10824732> and the fix in r152448.
llvm-svn: 152998
writing @synchronized statement; do not call locking
expression more than once and support early exits in
@synchronized's statement block (such as return).
llvm-svn: 152993
The symbol-aware stack hint combines the checker-provided message
with the information about how the symbol was passed to the callee: as
a parameter or a return value.
For malloc, the generated messages look like this :
"Returning from 'foo'; released memory via 1st parameter"
"Returning from 'foo'; allocated memory via 1st parameter"
"Returning from 'foo'; allocated memory returned"
"Returning from 'foo'; reallocation of 1st parameter failed"
(We are yet to handle cases when the symbol is a field in a struct or
an array element.)
llvm-svn: 152962
fast-isel before emitting code. If the program bails after code was emitted,
then it could lead to the stack being adjusted more than once (two
CALLSEQ_BEGINs emitted) but being adjuste back only once after the call. This
leads to general badness and gnashing of teeth.
<rdar://problem/11050630>
llvm-svn: 152959
% is a common character in IR so we'd crash on almost any malformed IR. The
diagnostic formatter expects a formatting directive when it sees an unescaped %.
llvm-svn: 152956
store to 1. This allows code-gen to select a more appropriate alignment. If left
to zero, an alignment greater than the alignment of the pointer may be selected,
causing code-gen to use instructions which require an alignment greater than the
pointer guarantees.
<rdar://problem/11043589>
llvm-svn: 152951
It's not a good style idea, as the registers will be laid down in memory in
numerical order, not the order they're in the list, but it's legal. vldm/vstm
are stricter.
rdar://11064740
llvm-svn: 152943
GetSupportFileAtIndex(), GetNumSupportFiles(), FindSupportFileIndex():
Add API support for getting the list of files in a compilation unit.
GetNumCompileUnits(), GetCompileUnitAtIndex():
Add API support for retrieving the compilation units in a module.
llvm-svn: 152942
For "int i = NULL;" we would produce:
null.cpp:5:11: warning: implicit conversion of NULL constant to integer [-Wconversion]
int i = NULL;
~ ^~~~
null.cpp:1:14: note: expanded from macro 'NULL'
\#define NULL __null
^~~~~~
But we really shouldn't trace that macro expansion back into the header, yet we
still want macro back traces for code like this:
\#define FOO NULL
int i = FOO;
or
\#define FOO int i = NULL;
FOO
While providing appropriate tagging at different levels of the expansion, etc.
The included test case exercises these cases & does some basic validation (to
ensure we don't have macro expansion notes where we shouldn't, and do where we
should) - but doesn't go as far as to validate the source location/ranges
used in those notes and warnings.
llvm-svn: 152940
Jordy Rose