Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chad Rosier 4179e3f513 Remove the X86 Maximal Stack Alignment Check pass as it is no longer necessary.
This pass was conservative in that it always reserved the FP to enable dynamic
stack realignment, which allowed the RA to use aligned spills for vector
registers.  This happens even when spills were not necessary.  The RA has 
since been improved to use unaligned spills when necessary.

The new behavior is to realign the stack if the frame pointer was already
reserved for some other reason, but don't reserve the frame pointer just
because a function contains vector virtual registers.

Part of rdar://12719844

llvm-svn: 168627
2012-11-26 22:55:05 +00:00
Preston Gurd f2ea70ae4a Fix remaining lit tests which were failing when run on an Atom
processor.

Patches by Tyler Nowicki, Andy Zhang, and Preston Gurd!

llvm-svn: 160520
2012-07-19 18:53:21 +00:00
Alexey Samsonov dcc1291d17 This CL changes the function prologue and epilogue emitted on X86 when stack needs realignment.
It is intended to fix PR11468.

Old prologue and epilogue looked like this:
push %rbp
mov %rsp, %rbp
and $alignment, %rsp
push %r14
push %r15
...
pop %r15
pop %r14
mov %rbp, %rsp
pop %rbp

The problem was to reference the locations of callee-saved registers in exception handling:
locations of callee-saved had to be re-calculated regarding the stack alignment operation. It would
take some effort to implement this in LLVM, as currently MachineLocation can only have the form
"Register + Offset". Funciton prologue and epilogue are now changed to:

push %rbp
mov %rsp, %rbp
push %14
push %15
and $alignment, %rsp
...
lea -$size_of_saved_registers(%rbp), %rsp
pop %r15
pop %r14
pop %rbp

Reviewed by Chad Rosier.

llvm-svn: 160248
2012-07-16 06:54:09 +00:00
Chad Rosier 3ee9a4c29e Add newline.
llvm-svn: 160006
2012-07-10 17:57:00 +00:00
Chad Rosier 579b1fee6b Add test case accidentally omitted from r160002.
llvm-svn: 160004
2012-07-10 17:49:39 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 2cc11fd8c7 Temporarily revert r158087.
This patch causes problems when both dynamic stack realignment and
dynamic allocas combine in the same function. With this patch, we no
longer build the epilog correctly, and silently restore registers from
the wrong position in the stack.

Thanks to Matt for tracking this down, and getting at least an initial
test case to Chad. I'm going to try to check a variation of that test
case in so we can easily track the fixes required.

llvm-svn: 158654
2012-06-18 07:03:12 +00:00
Chad Rosier 5d6f01ad77 Add support for dynamic stack realignment in the presence of dynamic allocas on
X86.
rdar://11496434

llvm-svn: 158087
2012-06-06 17:37:40 +00:00