Configuration macros are macros that are intended to alter how a
module works, such that we need to build different module variants
for different values of these macros. A module can declare its
configuration macros, in which case we will complain if the definition
of a configation macro on the command line (or lack thereof) differs
from the current preprocessor state at the point where the module is
imported. This should eliminate some surprises when enabling modules,
because "#define CONFIG_MACRO ..." followed by "#include
<module/header.h>" would silently ignore the CONFIG_MACRO setting. At
least it will no longer be silent about it.
Configuration macros are eventually intended to help reduce the number
of module variants that need to be built. When the list of
configuration macros for a module is exhaustive, we only need to
consider the settings for those macros when building/finding the
module, which can help isolate modules for various project-specific -D
flags that should never affect how modules are build (but currently do).
llvm-svn: 177466
A node's ordering is only propagated during legalization if (a) the new node does
not have an ordering (is not a CSE'd node), or (b) the new node has an ordering
that is higher than the node being legalized.
llvm-svn: 177465
This is another step along the way to making all DIScopes have a common prefix
which can be added to in a general manner to support using directives
(DW_TAG_imported_module).
llvm-svn: 177462
Mostly, try to depend on the annotation comments more so these tests are more
legible, brief, and agnostic to schema changes in the future (sure, they're not
agnostic to changes to the comment annotations but since they're easier to read
they should be easier to update if that happens).
llvm-svn: 177457
of the data it writes down into the process even
if the process doesn't exist. This will allow
the IR interpreter to access static data allocated
on the expression's behalf.
Also cleaned up object ownership in the
IRExecutionUnit so that allocations are created
into the allocations vector. This avoids needless
data copies.
<rdar://problem/13424594>
llvm-svn: 177456
A floating-point version is nice for testing unknown values, but it's
good to be able to check all parts of the structure as well.
Test change only, no functionality change.
llvm-svn: 177455
This fixes a crash when analyzing LLVM that was exposed by r177220 (modeling of
trivial copy/move assignment operators).
When we look up a lazy binding for “Builder”, we see the direct binding of Loc at offset 0.
Previously, we believed the binding, which led to a crash. Now, we do not believe it as
the types do not match.
llvm-svn: 177453
The whole reason we were doing a BFS in the first place is because an
ExplodedGraph can have cycles. Unfortunately, my removeErrorNode "update"
doesn't work at all if there are cycles.
I'd still like to be able to avoid doing the BFS every time, but I'll come
back to it later.
This reverts r177353 / 481fa5071c203bc8ba4f88d929780f8d0f8837ba.
llvm-svn: 177448
added back in by X86AsmPrinter::printIntelMemReference() during codegen.
Previously, this following example
void t() {
int i;
__asm mov eax, [i]
}
would generate the below assembly
mov eax, dword ptr [[eax]]
which resulted in a fatal error when compiling. Test case coming on the
clang side.
rdar://13444264
llvm-svn: 177440
an X86Operand, but also performs a Sema lookup and adds the sizing directive
when appropriate. Use this when parsing a bracketed statement. This is
necessary to get the instruction matching correct as well. Test case coming
on clang side.
rdar://13455408
llvm-svn: 177439
We don't want to write out >1000 files at the same time. That could make things
prohibitively expensive. Instead, register the "writeout" function so that it's
emitted serially.
<rdar://problem/12439551>
llvm-svn: 177437
It may be prohibitively expensive to write out >1000 files at the same time. So
we would rather emit them serially. These functions allow the GCOV
implementation to register the functions that writeout the GCOV information per
compile unit. At exit, they are written.
<rdar://problem/12439551>
llvm-svn: 177436
closing rbrace is missing in an ObjC class declaration.
Can do beter than this, but it involves addition of
overhead which will be present in correct code.
// rdar://6854840
llvm-svn: 177435
- it is trivially known to be used inside the loop in a way that can not be optimized away
- there is no use outside of the loop which can take advantage of the computation hoisting
llvm-svn: 177432
All pre-increment load patterns need to set the mayLoad flag (since
they don't provide a DAG pattern).
This was missing for LHAUX8 and LWAUX, which is added by this patch.
llvm-svn: 177431
As opposed to to pre-increment store patterns, the pre-increment
load patterns were already using standard memory operands, with
the sole exception of LHAU8.
As there's no real reason why LHAU8 should be different here,
this patch simply rewrites the pattern to also use a memri
operand, just like all the other patterns.
llvm-svn: 177430
Currently, pre-increment store patterns are written to use two separate
operands to represent address base and displacement:
stwu $rS, $ptroff($ptrreg)
This causes problems when implementing the assembler parser, so this
commit changes the patterns to use standard (complex) memory operands
like in all other memory access instruction patterns:
stwu $rS, $dst
To still match those instructions against the appropriate pre_store
SelectionDAG nodes, the patch uses the new feature that allows a Pat
to match multiple DAG operands against a single (complex) instruction
operand.
Approved by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 177429
of complex instruction operands (e.g. address modes).
Currently, if a Pat pattern creates an instruction that has a complex
operand (i.e. one that consists of multiple sub-operands at the MI
level), this operand must match a ComplexPattern DAG pattern with the
correct number of output operands.
This commit extends TableGen to alternatively allow match a complex
operands against multiple separate operands at the DAG level.
This allows using Pat patterns to match pre-increment nodes like
pre_store (which must have separate operands at the DAG level) onto
an instruction pattern that uses a multi-operand memory operand,
like the following example on PowerPC (will be committed as a
follow-on patch):
def STWU : DForm_1<37, (outs ptr_rc:$ea_res), (ins GPRC:$rS, memri:$dst),
"stwu $rS, $dst", LdStStoreUpd, []>,
RegConstraint<"$dst.reg = $ea_res">, NoEncode<"$ea_res">;
def : Pat<(pre_store GPRC:$rS, ptr_rc:$ptrreg, iaddroff:$ptroff),
(STWU GPRC:$rS, iaddroff:$ptroff, ptr_rc:$ptrreg)>;
Here, the pair of "ptroff" and "ptrreg" operands is matched onto the
complex operand "dst" of class "memri" in the "STWU" instruction.
Approved by Jakob Stoklund Olesen.
llvm-svn: 177428
The tocentry operand class refers to 64-bit values (it is only used in 64-bit,
where iPTR is a 64-bit type), but its sole suboperand is designated as 32-bit
type. This causes a mismatch to be detected at compile-time with the TableGen
patch I'll check in shortly.
To fix this, this commit changes the suboperand to a 64-bit type as well.
llvm-svn: 177427
def : Pat<(load (i64 (X86Wrapper tglobaltlsaddr :$dst))),
(MOV64rm tglobaltlsaddr :$dst)>;
This pattern is invalid because the MOV64rm instruction expects a
source operand of type "i64mem", which is a subclass of X86MemOperand
and thus actually consists of five MI operands, but the Pat provides
only a single MI operand ("tglobaltlsaddr" matches an SDnode of
type ISD::TargetGlobalTLSAddress and provides a single output).
Thus, if the pattern were ever matched, subsequent uses of the MOV64rm
instruction pattern would access uninitialized memory. In addition,
with the TableGen patch I'm about to check in, this would actually be
reported as a build-time error.
Fortunately, the pattern does in fact never match, for at least two
independent reasons.
First, the code generator actually never generates a pattern of the
form (load (X86Wrapper (tglobaltlsaddr))). For most combinations of
TLS and code models, (tglobaltlsaddr) represents just an offset that
needs to be added to some base register, so it is never directly
dereferenced. The only exception is the initial-exec model, where
(tglobaltlsaddr) refers to the (pc-relative) address of a GOT slot,
which *is* in fact directly dereferenced: but in that case, the
X86WrapperRIP node is used, not X86Wrapper, so the Pat doesn't match.
Second, even if some patterns along those lines *were* ever generated,
we should not need an extra Pat pattern to match it. Instead, the
original MOV64rm instruction pattern ought to match directly, since
it uses an "addr" operand, which is implemented via the SelectAddr
C++ routine; this routine is supposed to accept the full range of
input DAGs that may be implemented by a single mov instruction,
including those cases involving ISD::TargetGlobalTLSAddress (and
actually does so e.g. in the initial-exec case as above).
To avoid build breaks (due to the above-mentioned error) after the
TableGen patch is checked in, I'm removing this Pat here.
llvm-svn: 177426
Currently the PPC r0 register is unconditionally reserved. There are two reasons
for this:
1. r0 is treated specially (as the constant 0) by certain instructions, and so
cannot be used with those instructions as a regular register.
2. r0 is used as a temporary register in the CR-register spilling process
(where, under some circumstances, we require two GPRs).
This change addresses the first reason by introducing a restricted register
class (without r0) for use by those instructions that treat r0 specially. These
register classes have a new pseudo-register, ZERO, which represents the r0-as-0
use. This has the side benefit of making the existing target code simpler (and
easier to understand), and will make it clear to the register allocator that
uses of r0 as 0 don't conflict will real uses of the r0 register.
Once the CR spilling code is improved, we'll be able to allocate r0.
Adding these extra register classes, for some reason unclear to me, causes
requests to the target to copy 32-bit registers to 64-bit registers. The
resulting code seems correct (and causes no test-suite failures), and the new
test case covers this new kind of asymmetric copy.
As r0 is still reserved, no functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 177423
In case of macro body expansion, check to see if the macro is named NULL and
don't replace inside the macro body. This fixes the case when NULL appears
inside the macro body and the transform replaces the usage of the macro with
nullptr. This is an easy fix for the problem for now and we should analyze the
macro body to see if it expands to only NullToPointer in the future for a more
robust solution that takes care of user defined macros that behaves like NULL.
Other changes:
- Moved complex macro tests to macros.cpp
- Added new test cases.
- Added checks to make sure that the macro bodies are not modified by the tool.
Fixes: PR15396
Author: Tareq A Siraj <tareq.a.siraj@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 177422
Douglas Gregor