entry. This is in preparation for generic DW_OP_piece support.
No functional change so far.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3373
rdar://problem/15928306
llvm-svn: 207368
Only the object streamers need to track if a symbol should be marked thumb or
not. This ports the ELF case. The COFF case is not ported since it is currently
not working for some other reason (I will report a bug).
llvm-svn: 207366
* It is better if we leave third parties to do "independent" benchmark.
* We compare Clang (version unspecified) with gcc 4.0 or 4.2.
* The graphs have not been updated for a while.
* Clang is well known now. I don't think we still need to explain why
Clang is great.
llvm-svn: 207358
This restores the previous behaviour of just assuming that if you dont specify a
valid triple that you really meant the default triple with an ELF object file.
llvm-svn: 207349
Introduce support for WoA PE/COFF object file emission from LLVM. Add the new
target specific PE/COFF Streamer (ARMWinCOFFStreamer) that handles the ARM
specific behaviour of PE/COFF object emission. ARM exception information is not
yet emitted and is a TODO item.
The ARM specific object writer (ARMWinCOFFObjectWriter) handles the ARM specific
relocation handling in conjunction with the WinCOFFObjectWriter in the MC layer.
The MC layer needs to be updated to deal with the relocation adjustments.
Branch relocations are adjusted by 4 bytes (unlikely their ELF counterparts).
Minor tweaks to switch multiple conditional checks into equivalent switch
statements. The ObjectFileInfo is updated to relax the object file setup for
Windows COFF. Move the architecture checks into an assertion. Windows COFF is
currently only supported on x86, x86_64, and ARM (thumb). Rather than
defaulting to ELF, we will refuse to generate an object file. This is better
though as you do not get an (arbitrary) object file which is different from the
request.
llvm-svn: 207345
This introduces a target specific streamer, X86WinCOFFStreamer, which handles
the target specific behaviour (e.g. WinEH). This is mostly to ensure that
differences between ARM and X86 remain disjoint and do not accidentally cross
boundaries. This is the final staging change for enabling object emission for
Windows on ARM.
llvm-svn: 207344
This is in preparation for promoting WinCOFFStreamer to a base class which will
be shared by the X86 and ARM specific target COFF streamers. Also add a new
getOrCreateSymbolData interface (like MCELFStreamer) for the ARM COFF Streamer.
This makes the COFFStreamer more similar to the ELFStreamer.
llvm-svn: 207343
Stylistic changes to prepare for splitting up the COFFStreamer into target
specific streamers. Tweak some assertion messages. No functional change.
llvm-svn: 207342
Currently, the integrated assembler is the only choice for assembling Windows on
ARM binaries. IAS supports the .file <filename> directive which emits the file
symbol into the resulting object binary. Mark the GNU COFF information to
indicate support for this feature.
llvm-svn: 207341
API requirements much more obvious.
The key here is that there are two totally different use cases for
mutating the graph. Prior to doing any SCC formation, it is very easy to
mutate the graph. There may be users that want to do small tweaks here,
and then use the already-built graph for their SCC-based operations.
This method remains on the graph itself and is documented carefully as
being cheap but unavailable once SCCs are formed.
Once SCCs are formed, and there is some in-flight DFS building them, we
have to be much more careful in how we mutate the graph. These mutation
operations are sunk onto the SCCs themselves, which both simplifies
things (the code was already there!) and helps make it obvious that
these interfaces are only applicable within that context. The other
primary constraint is that the edge being mutated is actually related to
the SCC on which we call the method. This helps make it obvious that you
cannot arbitrarily mutate some other SCC.
I've tried to write much more complete documentation for the interesting
mutation API -- intra-SCC edge removal. Currently one aspect of this
documentation is a lie (the result list of SCCs) but we also don't even
have tests for that API. =[ I'm going to add tests and fix it to match
the documentation next.
llvm-svn: 207339
Craig Topper