Darwin x86 asm comment prefix designed to work around GAS on that
platform. That makes the comment-matching of the test much more stable.
llvm-svn: 214629
lowering with a small addition to it and adding PSHUFB combining.
There is one obvious place in the new vector shuffle lowering where we
should form PSHUFBs directly: when without them we will unpack a vector
of i8s across two different registers and do a potentially 4-way blend
as i16s only to re-pack them into i8s afterward. This is the crazy
expensive fallback path for i8 shuffles and we can just directly use
pshufb here as it will always be cheaper (the unpack and pack are
two instructions so even a single shuffle between them hits our
three instruction limit for forming PSHUFB).
However, this doesn't generate very good code in many cases, and it
leaves a bunch of common patterns not using PSHUFB. So this patch also
adds support for extracting a shuffle mask from PSHUFB in the X86
lowering code, and uses it to handle PSHUFBs in the recursive shuffle
combining. This allows us to combine through them, combine multiple ones
together, and generally produce sufficiently high quality code.
Extracting the PSHUFB mask is annoyingly complex because it could be
either pre-legalization or post-legalization. At least this doesn't have
to deal with re-materialized constants. =] I've added decode routines to
handle the different patterns that show up at this level and we dispatch
through them as appropriate.
The two primary test cases are updated. For the v16 test case there is
still a lot of room for improvement. Since I was going through it
systematically I left behind a bunch of FIXME lines that I'm hoping to
turn into ALL lines by the end of this.
llvm-svn: 214628
of normally binary shuffle instructions like PUNPCKL and MOVLHPS.
This detects cases where a single register is used for both operands
making the shuffle behave in a unary way. We detect this and adjust the
mask to use the unary form which allows the existing DAG combine for
shuffle instructions to actually work at all.
As a consequence, this uncovered a number of obvious bugs in the
existing DAG combine which are fixed. It also now canonicalizes several
shuffles even with the existing lowering. These typically are trying to
match the shuffle to the domain of the input where before we only really
modeled them with the floating point variants. All of the cases which
change to an integer shuffle here have something in the integer domain, so
there are no more or fewer domain crosses here AFAICT. Technically, it
might be better to go from a GPR directly to the floating point domain,
but detecting floating point *outputs* despite integer inputs is a lot
more code and seems unlikely to be worthwhile in practice. If folks are
seeing domain-crossing regressions here though, let me know and I can
hack something up to fix it.
Also as a consequence, a bunch of missed opportunities to form pshufb
now can be formed. Notably, splats of i8s now form pshufb.
Interestingly, this improves the existing splat lowering too. We go from
3 instructions to 1. Yes, we may tie up a register, but it seems very
likely to be worth it, especially if splatting the 0th byte (the
common case) as then we can use a zeroed register as the mask.
llvm-svn: 214625
so using a single helper which adds operands back onto the worklist.
Several places didn't rigorously do this but a couple already did.
Factoring them together and doing it rigorously is important to delete
things recursively early on in the combiner and get a chance to see
accurate hasOneUse values. While no existing test cases change, an
upcoming patch to add DAG combining logic for PSHUFB requires this to
work correctly.
llvm-svn: 214623
during DAGCombine in certain circumstances. Unfortunately, the circumstances required
to trigger the issue seem to require a pretty specific interaction of DAGCombines,
and I haven't been able to find a testcase that reproduces on X86, ARM, or AArch64.
The functionality added here is replicated in essentially every other DAG combine,
so it seems pretty obviously correct.
llvm-svn: 214622
It was hardcoding the value "python", which will end up at best
getting a different python executable (if the user has overridden
the value of PYTHON_EXECUTABLE), and at worst encountering an
error (if there is no copy of python on the system path).
This patch changes the script to use sys.executable so that it
runs the sub-script with the same executable that it was run with.
llvm-svn: 214618
expanding pseudo LOAD_STATCK_GUARD using instructions that are normally used
in pic mode. This patch fixes the bug.
<rdar://problem/17886592>
llvm-svn: 214614
This is something that I have found to be very useful in my work and I
wanted to contribute it back to the community since several people in
the past have asked me for something along these lines. (Jakob, I know
this has been a while coming ; )]
The way you use this is you create a script that takes in as its first
argument a count. The script passes into LLVM the count via a command
line flag that disables a pass after LLVM has run after the pass has
run for count number of times. Then the script invokes a test of some
sort and indicates whether LLVM successfully compiled the test via the
scripts exit status. Then you invoke bisect as follows:
bisect --start=<start_num> --end=<end_num> ./script.sh "%(count)s"
And bisect will continually call ./script.sh with various counts using
the exit status to determine success and failure.
llvm-svn: 214610
Summary:
This patch add a --show-xfail flag. If this flag is specified then each xfail test will be printed to output.
When it is not given xfail tests are ignored. Ignoring xfail tests is the current behavior.
This flag is meant to mirror the --show-unsupported flag that was recently added.
Reviewers: ddunbar, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4750
llvm-svn: 214609
compilation database and makes it behave consistently with other clang tools.
Reviewers: klimek, pcc
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4763
llvm-svn: 214607
makes a mess of the lit output when they ultimately fail.
The 2012-10-02-DAGCycle test is really frustrating because the *only*
explanation for what it is testing is a rdar link. I would really rather
that rdar links (which are not public or part of the open source
project) were not committed to the source code. Regardless, the actual
problem *must* be described as the rdar link is completely opaque. The
fact that this test didn't check for any particular output further
exacerbates the inability of any other developer to debug failures.
The mem-promote-integers test has nice comments and *seems* to be
a great test for our lowering... except that we don't actually check
that any of the generated code is correct or matches some pattern. We
just avoid crashing. It would be great to go back and populate this test
with the actual expectations.
llvm-svn: 214605
Instead of creating global variables for source locations and global names,
just create metadata nodes and strings. They will be transformed into actual
globals in the instrumentation pass (if necessary). This approach is more
flexible:
1) we don't have to ensure that our custom globals survive all the optimizations
2) if globals are discarded for some reason, we will simply ignore metadata for them
and won't have to erase corresponding globals
3) metadata for source locations can be reused for other purposes: e.g. we may
attach source location metadata to alloca instructions and provide better descriptions
for stack variables in ASan error reports.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 214604
introduced during legalization. This pattern is based on other patterns
in the legalizer that I changed in the same way. Now, the legalizer
eagerly collects its garbage when necessary so that we can survive
leaving such nodes around for it.
Instead, we add an assert to make sure the node will be correctly
handled by that layer.
llvm-svn: 214602
When the cost model determines vectorization is not possible/profitable these remarks print an analysis of that decision.
Note that in selectVectorizationFactor() we can assume that OptForSize and ForceVectorization are mutually exclusive.
Reviewed by Arnold Schwaighofer
llvm-svn: 214599
Updated `verify-uselistorder` to more than double the number of use-list
orders it checks.
- Every time it verifies an order, it then reverses the order and
verifies again.
- It now verifies the initial order, before running any shuffles.
Changed the default to `-num-shuffles=1`, since this is already four
checks, and after r214584 shuffling is guaranteed to make a new order.
This is part of PR5680.
llvm-svn: 214596
`shuffleUseLists()` is only used in `verify-uselistorder`, so move it
there to avoid bloating other executables. As a drive-by, update some
of the header docs.
This is part of PR5680.
llvm-svn: 214592
Unsurprisingly, changing a file modification time to a specific
date/time doesn't give the same epoch time everywhere. Just make the
file move into the past and look at only the first few digits of the
epoch time.
llvm-svn: 214589
We've added support for a multiple functions with the same name in
LLVM's profile data, so the lookup returning the function hash it
found doesn't make sense anymore. Update to pass in the hash we
expect.
This also adds a test that the version 1 format is still readable,
since the new API is expected to handle that.
llvm-svn: 214586
This updates the instrumentation based profiling format so that when
we have multiple functions with the same name (but different function
hashes) we keep all of them instead of rejecting the later ones.
There are a number of scenarios where this can come up where it's more
useful to keep multiple function profiles:
* Name collisions in unrelated libraries that are profiled together.
* Multiple "main" functions from multiple tools built against a common
library.
* Combining profiles from different build configurations (ie, asserts
and no-asserts)
The profile format now stores the number of counters between the hash
and the counts themselves, so that multiple sets of counts can be
stored. Since this is backwards incompatible, I've bumped the format
version and added some trivial logic to skip this when reading the old
format.
llvm-svn: 214585
we overrode debug information as the authoritative
source for type information, substituting types
from the Objective-C runtime. The runtime should
never be the primary source.
<rdar://problem/16065049>
llvm-svn: 214583
`parseBitcodeFile()` uses the generic `getLazyBitcodeFile()` function as
a helper. Since `parseBitcodeFile()` isn't actually lazy -- it calls
`MaterializeAllPermanently()` -- bypass the unnecessary call to
`materializeForwardReferencedFunctions()` by extracting out a common
helper function. This removes the last of the use-list churn caused by
blockaddresses.
This highlights that we can't reproduce use-list order of globals and
constants when parsing lazily -- but that's necessarily out of scope.
When we're parsing lazily, we never have all the functions in memory, so
the use-lists of globals (and constants that reference globals) are
always incomplete.
This is part of PR5680.
llvm-svn: 214581
Stop using ST registers for function returns and inline-asm instructions and use
FP registers instead. This allows removing a large amount of code in the
stackifier pass that was needed to track register liveness and handle copies
between ST and FP registers and function calls returning floating point values.
It also fixes a bug which manifests when an ST register defined by an
inline-asm instruction was live across another inline-asm instruction, as shown
in the following sequence of machine instructions:
1. INLINEASM <es:frndint> $0:[regdef], %ST0<imp-def,tied5>
2. INLINEASM <es:fldcw $0>
3. %FP0<def> = COPY %ST0
<rdar://problem/16952634>
llvm-svn: 214580
Tobias Grosser