Summary:
This allows hovering on keywords that refer to deduced types.
This should cover most useful cases. Not covered:
- auto template parameters: Since this can be instantiated with many types,
it would not be practical to show the types.
- Structured binding: This could be done later to show multiple deduced types
in the hover.
- auto:: (part of concepts): Outside the scope of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Marc-Andre Laperle <marc-andre.laperle@ericsson.com>
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48159
llvm-svn: 336119
Summary:
This signal is considered a relevance rather than a quality signal because it's
dependent on the query (the fact that it's completion, and implicitly the query
context).
This is part of the effort to reduce reliance on Sema priority, so we can have
consistent ranking between Index and Sema results.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: klimek, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47762
llvm-svn: 334026
Summary:
They cause lots of deserialization and are not actually used.
The ParsedAST accessor that previously returned those was renamed from
getTopLevelDecls to getLocalTopLevelDecls in order to avoid
confusion.
This change should considerably improve the speed of findDefinition
and other features that try to find AST nodes, corresponding to the
locations in the source code.
Reviewers: ioeric, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, mehdi_amini, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47331
llvm-svn: 333371
Summary:
This is more efficient and avoids data races when reading files that
come from the preamble. The staleness can occur when reading a file
from disk that changed after the preamble was built. This can lead to
crashes, e.g. when parsing comments.
We do not to rely on symbols from the main file anyway, since any info
that those provide can always be taken from the AST.
Reviewers: ioeric, sammccall
Reviewed By: ioeric
Subscribers: malaperle, klimek, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47272
llvm-svn: 333196
Summary:
Code completion scoring was embedded in CodeComplete.cpp, which is bad:
- awkward to test. The mechanisms (extracting info from index/sema) can be
unit-tested well, the policy (scoring) should be quantitatively measured.
Neither was easily possible, and debugging was hard.
The intermediate signal struct makes this easier.
- hard to reuse. This is a bug in workspaceSymbols: it just presents the
results in the index order, which is not sorted in practice, it needs to rank
them!
Also, index implementations care about scoring (both query-dependent and
independent) in order to truncate result lists appropriately.
The main yak shaved here is the build() function that had 3 variants across
unit tests is unified in TestTU.h (rather than adding a 4th variant).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46524
llvm-svn: 332378
Eric Liu