Summary:
This patch implements [dcl.fct.def.coroutine]p8:
> The unqualified-id get_return_object_on_allocation_failure is looked up in the scope of
> class P by class member access lookup (3.4.5). If a declaration is found, ..., and if a
> global allocation function is selected, the ::operator new(size_t, nothrow_t) form shall be used.
> [...]
> The allocation function used in this case must have a non-throwing noexcept-specification.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, rsmith, majnemer, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31562
llvm-svn: 300524
Summary:
Certain implicitly generated coroutine statements, such as the calls to 'return_value()' or `return_void()` or `get_return_object_on_allocation_failure()`, cannot be built until the promise type is no longer dependent. This means they are not built until after the coroutine body statement has been transformed.
This patch fixes an issue where these statements would never be built for coroutine templates.
It also fixes a small issue where diagnostics about `get_return_object_on_allocation_failure()` were incorrectly suppressed.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer, GorNishanov, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31487
llvm-svn: 300504
Summary:
This patch implements [dcl.fct.def.coroutine]p8:
> The unqualified-id get_return_object_on_allocation_failure is looked up in the scope of
> class P by class member access lookup (3.4.5). If a declaration is found, ..., and if a
> global allocation function is selected, the ::operator new(size_t, nothrow_t) form shall be used.
> [...]
> The allocation function used in this case must have a non-throwing noexcept-specification.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, rsmith, majnemer, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31562
llvm-svn: 300420
This reverts an attempt to check that types match when matching a
dependently-typed non-type template parameter. (This comes up when matching the
parameters of a template template parameter against the parameters of a
template template argument.)
The matching rules here are murky at best. Our behavior after this revert is
definitely wrong for certain C++17 features (for 'auto' template parameter
types within the parameter list of a template template argument in particular),
but our behavior before this revert is wrong for some pre-existing testcases,
so reverting to our prior behavior seems like our best option.
llvm-svn: 300262
We need to address cases (breaking libc++) such as
template <class _Up> static int __test(...);
template<typename _Tp>
auto v = __test<_Tp>(0);
llvm-svn: 299956
Follow-up to r299363 "Enhance -Wshadow to warn when shadowing typedefs or type
aliases".
Patch by Ahmed Asadi.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31235
llvm-svn: 299522
Summary:
Certain implicitly generated coroutine statements, such as the calls to 'return_value()' or `return_void()` or `get_return_object_on_allocation_failure()`, cannot be built until the promise type is no longer dependent. This means they are not built until after the coroutine body statement has been transformed.
This patch fixes an issue where these statements would never be built for coroutine templates.
It also fixes a small issue where diagnostics about `get_return_object_on_allocation_failure()` were incorrectly suppressed.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer, GorNishanov, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31487
llvm-svn: 299380
GCC has the alloc_align attribute, which is similar to assume_aligned, except the attribute's parameter is the index of the integer parameter that needs aligning to.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29599
llvm-svn: 299117
Summary:
If promise_type has get_return_object_on_allocation_failure defined,
check if an allocation function returns nullptr, and if so,
return the result of get_return_object_on_allocation_failure().
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31399
llvm-svn: 298891
Summary:
This patch implements parsing of [[clang::suppress(rule, ...)]]
and [[gsl::suppress(rule, ...)]] attributes.
C++ Core Guidelines depend heavily on tool support for
rule enforcement. They also propose a way to suppress
warnings [1] which is by annotating any ancestor in AST
with the C++11 attribute [[gsl::suppress(rule1,...)]].
To have a mechanism to suppress non-C++ Core
Guidelines specific, an additional spelling of [[clang::suppress]]
is defined.
For example, to suppress the warning cppcoreguidelines-slicing,
one could do
```
[[clang::suppress("cppcoreguidelines-slicing")]]
void f() { ... code that does slicing ... }
```
or
```
void g() {
Derived b;
[[clang::suppress("cppcoreguidelines-slicing")]]
Base a{b};
[[clang::suppress("cppcoreguidelines-slicing")]] {
doSomething();
Base a2{b};
}
}
```
This parsing can then be used by clang-tidy, which includes multiple
C++ Core Guidelines rules, to suppress warnings (see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24888).
For the exact naming of the rule in the attribute, there
are different possibilities, which will be defined in the
corresponding clang-tidy patch.
Currently, clang-tidy supports suppressing of warnings through "//
NOLINT" comments. There are some advantages that the attribute has:
- Suppressing specific warnings instead of all warnings
- Suppressing warnings in a block (namespace, function, compound
statement)
- Code formatting may split a statement into multiple lines,
thus a "// NOLINT" comment may be on the wrong line
I'm looking forward to your comments!
[1] https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#inforce-enforcement
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24886
llvm-svn: 298880
for unused values.
This fixes a regression caused by r298676, where constructor calls to
classes with non-trivial dtor were marked as unused if the first
argument is an initializer list. This is inconsistent (as the test
shows) and also warns on a reasonbly common code pattern where people
just call constructors to create and immediately destroy an object.
llvm-svn: 298853
This change fixes a crash on initialization of a reference from ({}) during
template instantiation and incidentally improves diagnostics.
This reverts a prior attempt to handle this in r286721. Instead, we teach the
initialization code that initialization cannot be performed if a source type
is required and the initializer is an initializer list (which is not an
expression and does not have a type), and likewise for function-style cast
expressions.
llvm-svn: 298676
Correct class-template deprecation behavior
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Previous DiffRev: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486, was reverted.
This patch fixes the issues brought up here by the reverter: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL298410
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31245
llvm-svn: 298634
Summary:
This patch adopts the recent changes that renamed `set_exception(exception_pointer)` to `unhandled_exception()`.
Additionally `unhandled_exception()` is now required, and so an error is emitted when exceptions are enabled but the promise type does not provide the member.
When exceptions are disabled a warning is emitted instead of an error, The warning notes that the `unhandled_exception()` function is required when exceptions are enabled.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov, aaron.ballman, majnemer
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30859
llvm-svn: 298565
We don't know whether some other instantiation of the template might be able to
reach the annotation, so warning on it has a high chance of false positives.
Patch by Ahmed Asadi!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31069
llvm-svn: 298477
The alias was only ever used on darwin and had some issues there,
and isn't used in practice much. Also fixes a problem with -mno-altivec
not turning off -maltivec.
Also add a diagnostic for faltivec/fno-altivec that directs users to use
maltivec options and include the altivec.h file explicitly.
llvm-svn: 298449
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486
llvm-svn: 298410
This commit adds support for a new attribute that will be used to
distinguish between extensible and inextensible enums. There are three
main purposes of this attribute:
1. Give better control over when enum-related warnings are issued.
For example, in the code below, clang will not issue a -Wassign-enum
warning if the enum is marked "open":
enum __attribute__((enum_extensibility(closed))) EnumClosed {
B0 = 1, B1 = 10
};
enum __attribute__((enum_extensibility(open))) EnumOpen {
C0 = 1, C1 = 10
};
enum EnumClosed ec = 100; // warning issued
enum EnumOpen eo = 100; // no warning
2. Enable code-completion and debugging tools to offer better
suggestions.
3. Make it easier for swift's clang importer to determine which swift
type an enum should be mapped to.
For more details, see the discussion I started on cfe-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-February/052748.html
rdar://problem/12764379
rdar://problem/23145650
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30766
llvm-svn: 298332
This adds -Wbitfield-enum-conversion, which warns on implicit
conversions that happen on bitfield assignment that change the value of
some enumerators.
Values of enum type typically take on a very small range of values, so
they are frequently stored in bitfields. Unfortunately, there is no
convenient way to calculate the minimum number of bits necessary to
store all possible values at compile time, so users usually hard code a
bitwidth that works today and widen it as necessary to pass basic
testing and validation. This is very error-prone, and leads to stale
widths as enums grow. This warning aims to catch such bugs.
This would have found two real bugs in clang and two instances of
questionable code. See r297680 and r297654 for the full description of
the issues.
This warning is currently disabled by default while we investigate its
usefulness outside of LLVM.
The major cause of false positives with this warning is this kind of
enum:
enum E { W, X, Y, Z, SENTINEL_LAST };
The last enumerator is an invalid value used to validate inputs or size
an array. Depending on the prevalance of this style of enum across a
codebase, this warning may be more or less feasible to deploy. It also
has trouble on sentinel values such as ~0U.
Reviewers: rsmith, rtrieu, thakis
Reviewed By: thakis
Subscribers: hfinkel, voskresensky.vladimir, sashab, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30923
llvm-svn: 297761
Summary:
Some coroutine diagnostics need to point to the location of the first coroutine keyword in the function, like when diagnosing a `return` inside a coroutine. Previously we did this by storing each *valid* coroutine statement in a list and select the first one to use in diagnostics. However if every coroutine statement is invalid we would have no location to point to.
This patch fixes the storage of the first coroutine statement location, ensuring that it gets stored even when the resulting AST node would be invalid.
This patch also removes the `CoroutineStmts` list in `FunctionScopeInfo` because it was unused.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30776
llvm-svn: 297547
Printing typedefs or type aliases using clang_getTypeSpelling() is missing the
namespace they are defined in. This is in contrast to other types that always
yield the full typename including namespaces.
Patch by Michael Reiher!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29944
llvm-svn: 297465
Summary:
A `co_await arg` expression has a dependent type whenever the promise type is still dependent, even if the argument to co_await is not. This is because we cannot attempt the `await_transform(<arg>)` until after we know the promise type.
This patch fixes an assertion in the constructor of `DependentCoawaitExpr` that asserted that `arg` must also be dependent.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30772
llvm-svn: 297358
Summary:
This patch adds passing a coroutine_handle object to await_suspend calls.
It builds the coroutine_handle using coroutine_handle<PromiseType>::from_address(__builtin_coro_frame()).
(a revision of https://reviews.llvm.org/D26316 that for some reason refuses to apply via arc patch)
Reviewers: GorNishanov
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30769
llvm-svn: 297356
Summary:
The changes contained in this patch are:
1. Defines a new AST node `CoawaitDependentExpr` for representing co_await expressions while the promise type is still dependent.
2. Correctly detect and transform the 'co_await' operand to `p.await_transform(<expr>)` when possible.
3. Change the initial/final suspend points to build during the initial parse, so they have the correct operator co_await lookup results.
4. Fix transformation of the CoroutineBodyStmt so that it doesn't re-build the final/initial suspends.
@rsmith: This change is a little big, but it's not trivial for me to split it up. Please let me know if you would prefer this submitted as multiple patches.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: ABataev, rsmith, mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26057
llvm-svn: 297093
Previously when a coroutine was building the implicit setup/destroy
constructs it would emit diagostics about failures on the first co_await/co_return/co_yield
it encountered. This was confusing because that construct may not itself be ill-formed.
This patch moves the diagnostics to the function start instead.
llvm-svn: 297089
Summary:
Don't warn about unused lambda captures that involve copying a
value of a type that cannot be trivially copied and destroyed.
Fixes PR31977
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30327
llvm-svn: 296602
The exisiting warning for inconsistent overrides does not include the destructor
as it was noted in review that it was too noisy. Instead, add to a separate
warning group that is off by default for users who want consistent warnings
between methods and destructors.
llvm-svn: 296572
Essentially, as a base class constructor does not construct virtual bases, such
a constructor for an abstract class does not need the corresponding base class
construction to be valid, and likewise for destructors.
This creates an awkward situation: clang will sometimes generate references to
the complete object and deleting destructors for an abstract class (it puts
them in the construction vtable for a derived class). But we can't generate a
"correct" version of these because we can't generate references to base class
constructors any more (if they're template specializations, say, we might not
have instantiated them and can't assume any other TU will emit a copy).
Fortunately, we don't need to, since no correct program can ever invoke them,
so instead emit symbols that just trap.
We should stop emitting references to these symbols, but still need to emit
definitions for compatibility.
llvm-svn: 296275
Rather than attempting to compare whether the previous and current top of
context stack are "equal" (which fails for a number of reasons, such as the
context stack entries containing pointers to objects on the stack, or reaching
the same "top of stack" entry through two different paths), track the depth of
context stack at which we last emitted a note and invalidate it when we pop the
context stack to less than that depth.
This causes us to emit some missing "in instantiation of" notes and to stop
emitting redundant "in instantiation of" stacks matching the previous stack in
rare cases.
llvm-svn: 295921
This is necessary in order for the evaluation of an _Atomic initializer for
those types to have an associated object, which an initializer for class or
array type needs.
llvm-svn: 295886
We need to look through the PackExpansionType in the parameter type when
deducing, and we need to consider the possibility of deducing arguments for
packs that are not lexically mentioned in the pattern (but are nonetheless
deducible) when figuring out which packs are covered by a pack deduction scope.
llvm-svn: 295790
case where the class template has a parameter pack.
Checking of the template arguments expects an "as-written" template argument
list, which in particular does not have any parameter packs. So flatten the
packs into separate arguments before passing them in.
llvm-svn: 295710
template deduction guides for class template argument deduction.
Ensure that we have a local instantiation scope for tracking the instantiated
parameters. Additionally, unusually, we're substituting at depth 1 and leaving
depth 0 alone; make sure that we don't reduce template parameter depth by 2 for
inner parameters in the process. (This is probably also broken for alias
templates in the case where they're expanded within a dependent context, but
this patch doesn't fix that.)
llvm-svn: 295696
Enable evaluation of captures within constexpr lambdas by using a strategy similar to that used in CodeGen:
- when starting evaluation of a lambda's call operator, create a map from VarDecl's to a closure's FieldDecls
- every time a VarDecl (or '*this) that represents a capture is encountered while evaluating the expression via the expression evaluator (specifically the LValueEvaluator) in ExprConstant.cpp - it is replaced by the corresponding FieldDecl LValue (an Lvalue-to-Rvalue conversion on this LValue representation then determines the right rvalue when needed).
Thanks to Richard Smith and Hubert Tong for their review and feedback!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29748
llvm-svn: 295279
guide from a constructor.
The purpose of this change is to avoid triggering instantiation of the class
when substituting back into the deduction guide if it uses a typedef member.
We will still instantiate the class if the constructor (explicitly or
implicitly, directly or indirectly) uses the current instantiation in a way
that we can't canonicalize out, but that seems unavoidable.
llvm-svn: 295016
Different diagnostics when format string does not match
actual arg type.
This commit contains the first 2 of 3 tests reviewed in D29685
llvm-svn: 294979
Summary:
Sema::CheckCompletedCoroutineBody was growing unwieldy with building all of the substatements. Also, constructors for CoroutineBodyStmt had way too many parameters.
Instead, CoroutineBodyStmt now defines CtorArgs structure with all of the required construction parameters.
CheckCompleteCoroutineBody delegates construction of individual substatements to short functions one per each substatement.
Also, added a drive-by fix of initializing CoroutinePromise to nullptr in ScopeInfo.h.
And addressed the FIXME that wanted to tail allocate extra room at the end of the CoroutineBodyStmt to hold parameter move expressions. (The comment was longer that the code that implemented tail allocation).
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28835
llvm-svn: 294933
It's actually meaningful and useful to allow such variables to have no
initializer, but we are strictly following the standard here until the C++
committee reaches consensus on allowing this.
llvm-svn: 294785
nested-name-specifier (as the standard appears to require), treat it as the
type specifier 'decltype(auto)' followed by a nested-name-specifier starting
with '::'.
llvm-svn: 294506
For non-template dllimport functions, MSVC allows providing an inline
definition without spelling out the attribute again. In the example below, f
remains a dllimport function.
__declspec(dllimport) int f();
inline int f() { return 42; }
int useit() {
return f();
}
However, for a function template, not putting dllimport on the redeclaration
causes it to be dropped. In the example below, f is not dllimport.
template <typename> __declspec(dllimport) int f();
template <typename> inline int f() { return 42; }
int useit() {
return f<int>();
}
This patch makes Clang match MSVC for the second example.
MSVC does not warn about the attribute being dropped in the example above, but
I think we should. (MSVC does warn if the inline keyword isn't used.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29152
llvm-svn: 293800
FindInstantiatedDecl or passing it to RebuildMemberExpr.
This fixes PR30361.
rdar://problem/17341274
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24969
llvm-svn: 293678
Don't try to map an APSInt addend to an int64_t in pointer arithmetic before
bounds-checking it. This gives more consistent behavior (outside C++11, we
consistently use 2s complement semantics for both pointer and integer overflow
in constant expressions) and fixes some cases where in C++11 we would fail to
properly check for out-of-bounds pointer arithmetic (if the 2s complement
64-bit overflow landed us back in-bounds).
In passing, also fix some cases where we'd perform possibly-overflowing
arithmetic on CharUnits (which have a signed underlying type) during constant
expression evaluation.
llvm-svn: 293595
This fixes various ways to tickle an assertion in constant expression
evaluation when using __int128. Longer term, we need to figure out what should
happen here: either any kind of overflow in offset calculation should result in
a non-constant value or we should truncate to 64 bits. In C++11 onwards, we're
effectively already checking for overflow because we strictly enforce array
bounds checks, but even there some forms of overflow can slip past undetected.
llvm-svn: 293568
r293360 broke some ARM bots, because size_t on those targets is
apparently `unsigned int`, not `unsigned long`. `sizeof(whatever)`
should to give us a `size_t`, so we can just use the type of that
instead.
llvm-svn: 293369
This patch changes how we handle argument-dependent `diagnose_if`
attributes. In particular, we now check them in the same place that we
check for things like passing NULL to Nonnull args, etc. This is
basically better in every way than how we were handling them before. :)
This fixes PR31638, PR31639, and PR31640.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28889
llvm-svn: 293360
This commit improves the mismatched destructor type error by detecting when the
destructor call has used a '.' instead of a '->' on a pointer to the destructed
type. The diagnostic now suggests to use '->' instead of '.', and adds a fixit
where appropriate.
rdar://28766702
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25817
llvm-svn: 292615
by providing a memchr builtin that returns char* instead of void*.
Also add a __has_feature flag to indicate the presence of constexpr forms of
the relevant <string> functions.
llvm-svn: 292555
Summary:
The warning doesn't know why the variable was looked up but not
odr-used, so reword it to not claim that it was used in an unevaluated
context.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28902
llvm-svn: 292498
CheckDesignatedInitializer wasn't taking into account the base classes
when computing the index for the field in the derived class, which
caused the test case to crash during IRGen because of a malformed AST.
rdar://problem/26795040
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28705
llvm-svn: 292245
Summary:
Warn when a lambda explicitly captures something that is not used in its body.
The warning is part of -Wunused and can be enabled with -Wunused-lambda-capture.
Reviewers: rsmith, arphaman, jbcoe, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Quuxplusone, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28467
llvm-svn: 291905
This commit ensures that clang avoids the redundant -Wshadow warning for
variables that already get a "redefinition of " error.
rdar://29067894
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28350
llvm-svn: 291564
Don't prematurely clean up an RAII object; there's another RAII object in the
same scope that tries to save and restore the same member!
llvm-svn: 291551
Check for implicit conversion sequences for non-dependent function
template parameters between deduction and substitution. The idea is to accept
as many cases as possible, on the basis that substitution failure outside the
immediate context is much more common during substitution than during implicit
conversion sequence formation.
This re-commits r290808, reverted in r290811 and r291412, with a couple of
fixes for handling of explicitly-specified non-trailing template argument
packs.
llvm-svn: 291427
`diagnose_if` can be used to have clang emit either warnings or errors
for function calls that meet user-specified conditions. For example:
```
constexpr int foo(int a)
__attribute__((diagnose_if(a > 10, "configurations with a > 10 are "
"expensive.", "warning")));
int f1 = foo(9);
int f2 = foo(10); // warning: configuration with a > 10 are expensive.
int f3 = foo(f2);
```
It currently only emits diagnostics in cases where the condition is
guaranteed to always be true. So, the following code will emit no
warnings:
```
constexpr int bar(int a) {
foo(a);
return 0;
}
constexpr int i = bar(10);
```
We hope to support optionally emitting diagnostics for cases like that
(and emitting runtime checks) in the future.
Release notes will appear shortly. :)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27424
llvm-svn: 291418
Add a visitor for lambda expressions to RecordExprEvaluator in ExprConstant.cpp that creates an empty APValue of Struct type to represent the closure object. Additionally, add a LambdaExpr visitor to the TemporaryExprEvaluator that forwards constant evaluation of immediately-called-lambda-expressions to the one in RecordExprEvaluator through VisitConstructExpr.
This patch supports:
constexpr auto ID = [] (auto a) { return a; };
static_assert(ID(3.14) == 3.14);
static_assert([](auto a) { return a + 1; }(10) == 11);
Lambda captures are still not supported for constexpr lambdas.
llvm-svn: 291416
Check for implicit conversion sequences for non-dependent function
template parameters between deduction and substitution. The idea is to accept
as many cases as possible, on the basis that substitution failure outside the
immediate context is much more common during substitution than during implicit
conversion sequence formation.
This re-commits r290808, reverted in r290811, with a fix for handling of
explicitly-specified template argument packs.
llvm-svn: 291410
This patch has been sitting in review hell since july 2016 and our lack of constexpr lambda support is getting embarrassing (given that I've had a branch that implements the feature (modulo *this capture) for over a year. While in Issaquah I was enjoying shamelessly trying to convince folks of the lie that this was Richard's fault ;) I won't be able to do so in Kona since I won't be attending - so I'm going to aim to have this feature be implemented by then.
I'm quite confident of the approach in this patch, which simply maps the static-invoker 'thunk' back to the corresponding call-operator (specialization).
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 291397
This implements something like the current direction of DR1581: we use a narrow
syntactic check to determine the set of places where a constant expression
could be evaluated, and only instantiate a constexpr function or variable if
it's referenced in one of those contexts, or is odr-used.
It's not yet clear whether this is the right set of syntactic locations; we
currently consider all contexts within templates that would result in odr-uses
after instantiation, and contexts within list-initialization (narrowing
conversions take another victim...), as requiring instantiation. We could in
principle restrict the former cases more (only const integral / reference
variable initializers, and contexts in which a constant expression is required,
perhaps). However, this is sufficient to allow us to accept libstdc++ code,
which relies on GCC's behavior (which appears to be somewhat similar to this
approach).
llvm-svn: 291318
dependent context and can't be used in a constant expression.
Per C++ [temp.inst]p2, "the instantiation of a static data member does not
occur unless the static data member is used in a way that requires the
definition to exist".
This doesn't /quite/ match that, as we still instantiate static data members
that are usable in constant expressions even if the use doesn't require a
definition. A followup patch will fix that for both variables and functions.
llvm-svn: 291295
Summary:
Replace some old code that probably pre-dated the change to delay
emission of dllexported code until after the closing brace of the
outermost record type. Only uninstantiated default argument expressions
need to be handled now. It is enough to instantiate default argument
expressions when instantiating dllexported default ctors. This also
fixes some double-diagnostic issues in this area.
Fixes PR31500
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28274
llvm-svn: 291045
Most code paths would already bail out in this case, but certain paths,
particularly overload resolution and typo correction, would not. Carrying on
with an invalid declaration could in some cases result in crashes due to
downstream code relying on declaration invariants that are not necessarily
met for invalid declarations, and in other cases just resulted in undesirable
follow-on diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 291030
Previously, if an overloaded function in a braced-init-list was encountered in
template argument deduction, and the overload set couldn't be resolved to a
particular function, we'd immediately produce a deduction failure. That's not
correct; this situation is supposed to result in that particular P/A pair being
treated as a non-deduced context, and deduction can still succeed if the type
can be deduced from elsewhere.
llvm-svn: 291014
Previously, if the arguments for a parameter pack contained a braced-init-list,
we would abort deduction (keeping the pack deductions from prior arguments) at
the point when we reached the braced-init-list, resulting in wrong deductions
and rejects-valids. We now just leave a "hole" in the pack for such an argument,
which needs to be filled by another deduction of the same pack.
llvm-svn: 290933
This reverts commit r290808, as it broken all ARM and AArch64 test-suite
test: MultiSource/UnitTests/C++11/frame_layout
Also, please, next time, try to write a commit message in according to
our guidelines:
http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#commit-messages
llvm-svn: 290811
template parameters between deduction and substitution. The idea is to accept
as many cases as possible, on the basis that substitution failure outside
the immediate context is much more common during substitution than during
implicit conversion sequence formation.
This does not implement the partial ordering portion of DR1391, which so
far appears to be misguided.
llvm-svn: 290808
We shouldn't throw a warning when the static keyword is not present in
an anonymous namespace, just like we do for -Wmissing-prototypes.
llvm-svn: 290443
Print the fully qualified names for the overload candidates. This makes
it easier to tell what the ambiguity is. Especially if a template
is instantiated after a using namespace, it will not inherit the
namespace where it was declared. The specialization will give a message
about a partial order being ambiguous for the same (unqualified) name,
which does not help identify the failure.
Addresses PR31450!
llvm-svn: 290315
This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan
failures. msan was failing because we were calling
`isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us
to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of
said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in
`isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more
easily in the future.
Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :)
Original commit message:
This patch does three things:
- Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the
number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user
functions that act in a similar manner.
- Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables
is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in
test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly
unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in
person.
- Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at
D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when
combined with our new eagerness in the face of const.
llvm-svn: 290297
effect they would have in C++11. In particular, they do not prevent
value-initialization from performing zero-initialization, nor do they prevent a
struct from being an aggregate.
llvm-svn: 290229
This commit fails MSan when running test/CodeGen/object-size.c in
a confusing way. After some discussion with George, it isn't really
clear what is going on here. We can make the MSan failure go away by
testing for the invalid bit, but *why* things are invalid isn't clear.
And yet, other code in the surrounding area is doing precisely this and
testing for invalid.
George is going to take a closer look at this to better understand the
nature of the failure and recommit it, for now backing it out to clean
up MSan builds.
llvm-svn: 290169
This patch fixes an assertion that is triggered when RecordLayoutBuilder
tries to compute the size of a field (for capture "name" in the test
case) whose type hasn't been deduced. The patch fixes the bug by
correcting the typo of the capture initializer after the initializer is
parsed and before setting the expression for the annotation token.
Fixes PR30566.
rdar://problem/23380132
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25206
llvm-svn: 290156
This patch does three things:
- Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the
number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user
functions that act in a similar manner.
- Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables
is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in
test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly
unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in
person.
- Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at
D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when
combined with our new eagerness in the face of const.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D14274
llvm-svn: 290149
* In C++, never create a FunctionNoProtoType for a builtin (fixes C++1z
crasher from r289754).
* Fix type of __sync_synchronize to be a no-parameter function rather than a
varargs function. This matches GCC.
* Fix type of vfprintf to match its actual type. We gave it a wrong type due
to PR4290 (apparently autoconf generates invalid code and expects compilers
to choke it down or it miscompiles the program; the relevant error in clang
was downgraded to a warning in r122744 to fix other occurrences of this
autoconf brokenness, so we don't need this workaround any more).
* Turn off vararg argument checking for __noop, since it's not *really* a
varargs function. Alternatively we could add custom type checking for it
and synthesize parameter types matching the actual arguments in each call,
but that seemed like overkill.
llvm-svn: 290146
lambda expression is instantiated.
Rather than waiting until Sema::CheckCXXDefaultArgExpr tries to
transform the default arguments (which fails because it can't get the
template arguments that are used), transform the default arguments
earlier when the lambda expression is transformed in
TransformLambdaExpr.
rdar://problem/27535319
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23096
llvm-svn: 289990
copy constructors of classes with array members, instead using
ArrayInitLoopExpr to represent the initialization loop.
This exposed a bug in the static analyzer where it was unable to differentiate
between zero-initialized and unknown array values, which has also been fixed
here.
llvm-svn: 289618
Other compilers accept invalid code here that we reject, and we need a
better error message to try to convince users that the code is really
incorrect. Consider:
class Foo {
typedef MyIterHelper<Foo> iterator;
friend class iterator;
};
Previously our wording was "elaborated type refers to a typedef".
"elaborated type" isn't widely known terminology, so the new diagnostic
says "typedef 'iterator' cannot be referenced with class specifier".
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25216
llvm-svn: 289259
mirror the description in the standard. Per DR1295, this means that binding a
const / rvalue reference to a bit-field no longer "binds directly", and per
P0135R1, this means that we materialize a temporary in reference binding
after adjusting cv-qualifiers and before performing a derived-to-base cast.
In C++11 onwards, this should have fixed the last case where we would
materialize a temporary of the wrong type (with a subobject adjustment inside
the MaterializeTemporaryExpr instead of outside), but we still have to deal
with that possibility in C++98, unless we want to start using xvalues to
represent materialized temporaries there too.
llvm-svn: 289250
This saves two pointers from FunctionDecl that were being used for some
rare and questionable C-only functionality. The DeclsInPrototypeScope
ArrayRef was added in r151712 in order to parse this kind of C code:
enum e {x, y};
int f(enum {y, x} n) {
return x; // should return 1, not 0
}
The challenge is that we parse 'int f(enum {y, x} n)' it its own
function prototype scope that gets popped before we build the
FunctionDecl for 'f'. The original change was doing two questionable
things:
1. Saving all tag decls introduced in prototype scope on a TU-global
Sema variable. This is problematic when you have cases like this, where
'x' and 'y' shouldn't be visible in 'f':
void f(void (*fp)(enum { x, y } e)) { /* no x */ }
This patch fixes that, so now 'f' can't see 'x', which is consistent
with GCC.
2. Storing the decls in FunctionDecl in ActOnFunctionDeclarator so that
they could be used in ActOnStartOfFunctionDef. This is just an
inefficient way to move information around. The AST lives forever, but
the list of non-parameter decls in prototype scope is short lived.
Moving these things to the Declarator solves both of these issues.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: jmolloy, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27279
llvm-svn: 289225
This commit ensures that the switch warning "case value not in enumerated type"
isn't shown for opaque enums. We don't know the actual list of values in opaque
enums, so that warning is incorrect.
rdar://29230764
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27299
llvm-svn: 289055
We continue to support dynamic exception specifications in C++1z as an
extension, but produce an error-by-default warning when we encounter one. This
allows users to opt back into the feature with a warning flag, and implicitly
opts system headers back into the feature should they happen to use it.
There is one semantic change implied by P0003R5 but not implemented here:
violating a throw() exception specification should now call std::terminate
directly instead of calling std::unexpected(), but since P0003R5 also removes
std::unexpected() and std::set_unexpected, and the default unexpected handler
calls std::terminate(), a conforming C++1z program cannot tell that we are
still calling it. The upside of this strategy is perfect backwards
compatibility; the downside is that we don't get the more efficient 'noexcept'
codegen for 'throw()'.
llvm-svn: 289019
When an object of class type is initialized from a prvalue of the same type
(ignoring cv qualifications), use the prvalue to initialize the object directly
instead of inserting a redundant elidable call to a copy constructor.
llvm-svn: 288866
Our -Wweak-vtables diagnostic is powered by our key function
calculation, which checks if key functions are enabled. We won't find
any key functions in C++ ABIs that lack key functions, so -Wweak-vtables
was warning on every dynamic class before this change. So, turn off this
warning in ABIs without key functions.
Addresses PR31220
llvm-svn: 288850
latter case, a temporary array object is materialized, and can be
lifetime-extended by binding a reference to the member access. Likewise, in an
array-to-pointer decay, an rvalue array is materialized before being converted
into a pointer.
This caused IR generation to stop treating file-scope array compound literals
as having static storage duration in some cases in C++; that has been rectified
by modeling such a compound literal as an lvalue. This also improves clang's
compatibility with GCC for those cases.
llvm-svn: 288654
arguments from a declaration; despite what the standard says, this form of
deduction should not be considering exception specifications.
llvm-svn: 288301
specifications in this mode in C++17, since they're part of the function type,
so check and diagnose them like we would if exceptions were enabled.
Better ideas welcome.
llvm-svn: 288220
Eric Fiselier