When Reassociator optimize "(x | C1)" ^ "(X & C2)", it may swap the two
subexpressions, however, it forgot to swap cached constants (of C1 and C2)
accordingly.
rdar://13739160
llvm-svn: 180676
operands of the expression being written was wrongly thought to be reusable as
an inner node of the expression resulting in it turning up as both an inner node
*and* a leaf, creating a cycle in the def-use graph. This would have caused the
verifier to blow up if things had gotten that far, however it managed to provoke
an infinite loop first.
llvm-svn: 168291
the utility for extracting a chain of operations from the IR, thought that it
might as well combine any constants it came across (rather than just returning
them along with everything else). On the other hand, the factorization code
would like to see the individual constants (this is quite reasonable: it is
much easier to pull a factor of 3 out of 2*3 than it is to pull it out of 6;
you may think 6/3 isn't so hard, but due to overflow it's not as easy to undo
multiplications of constants as it may at first appear). This patch therefore
makes LinearizeExprTree stupider: it now leaves optimizing to the optimization
part of reassociate, and sticks to just analysing the IR.
llvm-svn: 168035
The assertion is trigged when the Reassociater tries to transform expression
... + 2 * n * 3 + 2 * m + ...
into:
... + 2 * (n*3 + m).
In the process of the transformation, a helper routine folds the constant 2*3 into 6,
confusing optimizer which is trying the to eliminate the common factor 2, and cannot
find 2 any more.
Review is pending. But I'd like commit first in order to help those who are waiting
for this fix.
llvm-svn: 167740
This was done through the aid of a terrible Perl creation. I will not
paste any of the horrors here. Suffice to say, it require multiple
staged rounds of replacements, state carried between, and a few
nested-construct-parsing hacks that I'm not proud of. It happens, by
luck, to be able to deal with all the TCL-quoting patterns in evidence
in the LLVM test suite.
If anyone is maintaining large out-of-tree test trees, feel free to poke
me and I'll send you the steps I used to convert things, as well as
answer any painful questions etc. IRC works best for this type of thing
I find.
Once converted, switch the LLVM lit config to use ShTests the same as
Clang. In addition to being able to delete large amounts of Python code
from 'lit', this will also simplify the entire test suite and some of
lit's architecture.
Finally, the test suite runs 33% faster on Linux now. ;]
For my 16-hardware-thread (2x 4-core xeon e5520): 36s -> 24s
llvm-svn: 159525
before the expression root. Any existing operators that are changed to use one
of them needs to be moved between it and the expression root, and recursively
for the operators using that one. When I rewrote RewriteExprTree I accidentally
inverted the logic, resulting in the compacting going down from operators to
operands rather than up from operands to the operators using them, oops. Fix
this, resolving PR12963.
llvm-svn: 159265
example degenerate phi nodes and binops that use themselves in unreachable code.
Thanks to Charles Davis for the testcase that uncovered this can of worms.
llvm-svn: 158508
POD type, causing memory corruption when mapping to APInts with bitwidth > 64.
Merge another crash testcase into crash.ll while there.
llvm-svn: 158369
topologies, it is quite possible for a leaf node to have huge multiplicity, for
example: x0 = x*x, x1 = x0*x0, x2 = x1*x1, ... rapidly gives a value which is x
raised to a vast power (the multiplicity, or weight, of x). This patch fixes
the computation of weights by correctly computing them no matter how big they
are, rather than just overflowing and getting a wrong value. It turns out that
the weight for a value never needs more bits to represent than the value itself,
so it is enough to represent weights as APInts of the same bitwidth and do the
right overflow-avoiding dance steps when computing weights. As a side-effect it
reduces the number of multiplies needed in some cases of large powers. While
there, in view of external uses (eg by the vectorizer) I made LinearizeExprTree
static, pushing the rank computation out into users. This is progress towards
fixing PR13021.
llvm-svn: 158358
can move instructions within the instruction list. If the instruction just
happens to be the one the basic block iterator is pointing to, and it is
moved to a different basic block, then we get into an infinite loop due to
the iterator running off the end of the basic block (for some reason this
doesn't fire any assertions). Original commit message:
Grab-bag of reassociate tweaks. Unify handling of dead instructions and
instructions to reoptimize. Exploit this to more systematically eliminate
dead instructions (this isn't very useful in practice but is convenient for
analysing some testcase I am working on). No need for WeakVH any more: use
an AssertingVH instead.
llvm-svn: 158199
instructions to reoptimize. Exploit this to more systematically eliminate
dead instructions (this isn't very useful in practice but is convenient for
analysing some testcase I am working on). No need for WeakVH any more: use
an AssertingVH instead.
llvm-svn: 158073
then it doesn't alter the instructions composing it, however it would continue
to move the instructions to just before the expression root. Ensure it doesn't
move them either, so now it really does nothing if there is nothing to do. That
commit also ensured that nsw etc flags weren't cleared if the expression was not
being changed. Tweak this a bit so that it doesn't clear flags on the initial
part of a computation either if that part didn't change but later bits did.
llvm-svn: 157518
with arbitrary topologies (previously it would give up when hitting a diamond
in the use graph for example). The testcase from PR12764 is now reduced from
a pile of additions to the optimal 1617*%x0+208. In doing this I changed the
previous strategy of dropping all uses for expression leaves to one of dropping
all but one use. This works out more neatly (but required a bunch of tweaks)
and is also safer: some recently fixed bugs during recursive linearization were
because the linearization code thinks it completely owns a node if it has no uses
outside the expression it is linearizing. But if the node was also in another
expression that had been linearized (and thus all uses of the node from that
expression dropped) then the conclusion that it is completely owned by the
expression currently being linearized is wrong. Keeping one use from within each
linearized expression avoids this kind of mistake.
llvm-svn: 157467
replace the operands of expressions with only one use with undef and generate
a new expression for the original without using RAUW to update the original.
Thus any copies of the original expression held in a vector may end up
referring to some bogus value - and using a ValueHandle won't help since there
is no RAUW. There is already a mechanism for getting the effect of recursion
non-recursively: adding the value to be recursed on to RedoInsts. But it wasn't
being used systematically. Have various places where recursion had snuck in at
some point use the RedoInsts mechanism instead. Fixes PR12169.
llvm-svn: 156379
elements to minimize the number of multiplies required to compute the
final result. This uses a heuristic to attempt to form near-optimal
binary exponentiation-style multiply chains. While there are some cases
it misses, it seems to at least a decent job on a very diverse range of
inputs.
Initial benchmarks show no interesting regressions, and an 8%
improvement on SPASS. Let me know if any other interesting results (in
either direction) crop up!
Credit to Richard Smith for the core algorithm, and helping code the
patch itself.
llvm-svn: 155616
1) Make the checked assertions a bit more precise. We really want the
canonical forms coming out of reassociate to be exactly what is
expected.
2) Remove other passes, and switch the test to actually directly check
that reassociate makes the important transforms and
canonicalizations.
3) Fold in a related test case now that we're using FileCheck. Make the
same tidying changes to it.
llvm-svn: 155311
patch brings numerous advantages to LLVM. One way to look at it
is through diffstat:
109 files changed, 3005 insertions(+), 5906 deletions(-)
Removing almost 3K lines of code is a good thing. Other advantages
include:
1. Value::getType() is a simple load that can be CSE'd, not a mutating
union-find operation.
2. Types a uniqued and never move once created, defining away PATypeHolder.
3. Structs can be "named" now, and their name is part of the identity that
uniques them. This means that the compiler doesn't merge them structurally
which makes the IR much less confusing.
4. Now that there is no way to get a cycle in a type graph without a named
struct type, "upreferences" go away.
5. Type refinement is completely gone, which should make LTO much MUCH faster
in some common cases with C++ code.
6. Types are now generally immutable, so we can use "Type *" instead
"const Type *" everywhere.
Downsides of this patch are that it removes some functions from the C API,
so people using those will have to upgrade to (not yet added) new API.
"LLVM 3.0" is the right time to do this.
There are still some cleanups pending after this, this patch is large enough
as-is.
llvm-svn: 134829
reassociation opportunities are exposed. This fixes a bug where
the nested reassociation expects to be the IR to be consistent,
but it isn't, because the outer reassociation has disconnected
some of the operands. rdar://9167457
llvm-svn: 129324
after it has finished all of its reassociations, because its
habit of unlinking operands and holding them in a datastructure
while working means that it's not easy to determine when an
instruction is really dead until after all its regular work is
done. rdar://9096268.
llvm-svn: 127424
operand being factorized (and erased) could occur several times in Ops,
resulting in freed memory being used when the next occurrence in Ops was
analyzed.
llvm-svn: 124287
positive and negative forms of constants together. This
allows us to compile:
int foo(int x, int y) {
return (x-y) + (x-y) + (x-y);
}
into:
_foo: ## @foo
subl %esi, %edi
leal (%rdi,%rdi,2), %eax
ret
instead of (where the 3 and -3 were not factored):
_foo:
imull $-3, 8(%esp), %ecx
imull $3, 4(%esp), %eax
addl %ecx, %eax
ret
this started out as:
movl 12(%ebp), %ecx
imull $3, 8(%ebp), %eax
subl %ecx, %eax
subl %ecx, %eax
subl %ecx, %eax
ret
This comes from PR5359.
llvm-svn: 92381
Manman Ren