The current SystemZ back-end only supports the local-exec TLS access model.
This patch adds all required MC support for the other TLS models, which
means in particular:
- Support additional relocation types for
Initial-exec model: R_390_TLS_IEENT
Local-dynamic-model: R_390_TLS_LDO32, R_390_TLS_LDO64,
R_390_TLS_LDM32, R_390_TLS_LDM64, R_390_TLS_LDCALL
General-dynamic model: R_390_TLS_GD32, R_390_TLS_GD64, R_390_TLS_GDCALL
- Support assembler syntax to generate additional relocations
for use with __tls_get_offset calls:
:tls_gdcall:
:tls_ldcall:
The patch also adds a new test to verify fixups and relocations,
and removes the (already unused) FK_390_PLT16DBL/FK_390_PLT32DBL
fixup kinds.
llvm-svn: 229652
Make sure they all have llvm_unreachable on the default path out of the switch. Remove unnecessary "default: break". Remove a 'return' after unreachable. Fix some indentation.
llvm-svn: 225114
ARM in particular is getting dangerously close to exceeding 32 bits worth of
possible subtarget features. When this happens, various parts of MC start to
fail inexplicably as masks get truncated to "unsigned".
Mostly just refactoring at present, and there's probably no way to test.
llvm-svn: 215887
I saw at least a memory leak or two from inspection (on probably
untested error paths) and r206991, which was the original inspiration
for this change.
I ran this idea by Jim Grosbach a few weeks ago & he was OK with it.
Since it's a basically mechanical patch that seemed sufficient - usual
post-commit review, revert, etc, as needed.
llvm-svn: 210427
For now it contains a single flag, SanitizeAddress, which enables
AddressSanitizer instrumentation of inline assembly.
Patch by Yuri Gorshenin.
llvm-svn: 206971
This just adds the basics necessary for allocating the upper words to
virtual registers (move, load and store). The move support is parameterised
in a way that makes it easy to handle zero extensions, but the associated
zero-extend patterns are added by a later patch.
The easiest way of testing this seemed to be add a new "h" register
constraint for high words. I don't expect the constraint to be useful
in real inline asms, but it should work, so I didn't try to hide it
behind an option.
llvm-svn: 191739
The only thing this does on its own is make the definitions of RISB[HL]G
a bit more precise. Those instructions are only used by the MC layer at
the moment, so no behavioral change is intended. The class is needed by
later patches though.
llvm-svn: 191660
The 'Deprecated' class allows you to specify a SubtargetFeature that the
instruction is deprecated on.
The 'ComplexDeprecationPredicate' class allows you to define a custom
predicate that is called to check for deprecation.
For example:
ComplexDeprecationPredicate<"MCR">
would mean you would have to define the following function:
bool getMCRDeprecationInfo(MCInst &MI, MCSubtargetInfo &STI,
std::string &Info)
Which returns 'false' for not deprecated, and 'true' for deprecated
and store the warning message in 'Info'.
The MCTargetAsmParser constructor was chaned to take an extra argument of
the MCInstrInfo class, so out-of-tree targets will need to be changed.
llvm-svn: 190598
This removes the need to store the asm variant in each row of the single table that existed before. Shaves ~16K off the size of X86AsmParser.o.
llvm-svn: 187026
This is the first use of D(L,B) addressing, which required a fair bit
of surgery. For that reason, the patch just adds the instruction
definition and the associated assembler and disassembler support.
A later patch will actually make use of it for codegen.
llvm-svn: 185433
Previously, an invalid instruction like:
foo %r1, %r0
would generate the rather odd error message:
....: error: unknown token in expression
foo %r1, %r0
^
We now get the more informative:
....: error: invalid instruction
foo %r1, %r0
^
The same would happen if an address were used where a register was expected.
We now get "invalid operand for instruction" instead.
llvm-svn: 182644
The idea is to make sure that:
(1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister()
is called and the token obviously isn't a register.
(2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..."
sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense.
(3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where
the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.).
(4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type,
but is not a valid register pair.
Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative
instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from
that class are accepted.
(4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs)
and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that
requires a pair).
While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the
operand class.
llvm-svn: 182643
The GNU assembler treats things like:
brasl %r14, 100
in the same way as:
brasl %r14, .+100
rather than as a branch to absolute address 100. We implemented this in
LLVM by creating an immediate operand rather than the usual expr operand,
and by handling immediate operands specially in the code emitter.
This was undesirable for (at least) three reasons:
- the specialness of immediate operands was exposed to the backend MC code,
rather than being limited to the assembler parser.
- in disassembly, an immediate operand really is an absolute address.
(Note that this means reassembling printed disassembly can't recreate
the original code.)
- it would interfere with any assembly manipulation that we might
try in future. E.g. operations like branch shortening can change
the relative position of instructions, but any code that updates
sym+offset addresses wouldn't update an immediate "100" operand
in the same way as an explicit ".+100" operand.
This patch changes the implementation so that the assembler creates
a "." label for immediate PC-relative operands, so that the operand
to the MCInst is always the absolute address. The patch also adds
some error checking of the offset.
llvm-svn: 181773
The SystemZ port currently relies on the order of the instruction operands
matching the order of the instruction field lists. This isn't desirable
for disassembly, where the two are matched only by name. E.g. the R1 and R2
fields of an RR instruction should have corresponding R1 and R2 operands.
The main complication is that addresses are compound operands,
and as far as I know there is no mechanism to allow individual
suboperands to be selected by name in "let Inst{...} = ..." assignments.
Luckily it doesn't really matter though. The SystemZ instruction
encoding groups all address fields together in a predictable order,
so it's just as valid to see the entire compound address operand as
a single field. That's the approach taken in this patch.
Matching by name in turn means that the operands to COPY SIGN and
CONVERT TO FIXED instructions can be given in natural order.
(It was easier to do this at the same time as the rename,
since otherwise the intermediate step was too confusing.)
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 181771
This adds the actual lib/Target/SystemZ target files necessary to
implement the SystemZ target. Note that at this point, the target
cannot yet be built since the configure bits are missing. Those
will be provided shortly by a follow-on patch.
This version of the patch incorporates feedback from reviews by
Chris Lattner and Anton Korobeynikov. Thanks to all reviewers!
Patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 181203
Ulrich Weigand