nullptr_t does not access memory.
We now reuse CK_NullToPointer to represent a conversion from a glvalue
of type nullptr_t to a prvalue of nullptr_t where necessary.
This reinstates r345562, reverted in r346065, now that CodeGen's
handling of non-odr-used variables has been fixed.
llvm-svn: 363337
Summary: AFAIK, the "sparc" target is big endian and the target for 32-bit little-endian SPARC is denoted as "sparcel". This patch fixes the endianness of "sparc" target and adds "sparcel" target for 32-bit little-endian SPARC.
Reviewers: espindola, alexshap, rupprecht, jhenderson
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Subscribers: jyknight, emaste, arichardson, fedor.sergeev, jakehehrlich, MaskRay, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63251
llvm-svn: 363336
Summary:
Before it was using the fully qualified name only for static data members.
Now it does for all variable names to match MSVC.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63012
llvm-svn: 363335
The only caller of SymbolizableObjectFile::create passes a non-null
DebugInfoContext and asserts that they do so. Move the assert into
SymbolizableObjectFile::create and remove null checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63298
llvm-svn: 363334
Constants, including G_GLOBAL_VALUE, are all emitted into the entry block which
lets us use the vreg def assuming it dominates all other users. However, it can
cause jumpy debug behaviour since the DebugLoc attached to these MIs are from
a user instruction that could be in a different block.
Fixes PR40887.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63286
llvm-svn: 363331
Merging the two bits shrinks the context table from 16384 bytes to 8192 bytes.
Remove the ATTRIBUTE_BITS macro and just create an enum directly. Then fix the ATTR_max define to be 8192 to reflect the table size so we stop hardcoding it separately.
llvm-svn: 363330
This was exposed by PowerPC target enablement.
In ScheduleDAG, if we haven't seen any uses in this scheduling region,
we will create a dependence edge to ExitSU to model the live-out latency.
This is required for vreg defs with no in-region use, and prefetches with
no vreg def.
When we build NodeOrder in Scheduler, we ignore these boundary nodes.
However, when we check Succs in checkValidNodeOrder, we did not skip
them, so we still assume all the nodes have been sorted and in order in
Indices array. So when we call lower_bound() for ExitSU, it will return
Indices.end(), causing memory issues in following Node access.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63282
llvm-svn: 363329
* Add a common function to setup opt-remarks
* Rename common options to the same names
* Add error types to distinguish between file errors and regex errors
llvm-svn: 363328
Support loading code coverage data from regular archives, thin archives,
and from MachO universal binaries which contain archives.
Testing: check-llvm, check-profile (with {A,UB}San enabled)
rdar://51538999
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63232
llvm-svn: 363325
notifyResolved/notifyEmitted.
The 'notify' prefix better describes what these methods do: they update the JIT
symbol states and notify any pending queries that the 'resolved' and 'emitted'
states have been reached (rather than actually performing the resolution or
emission themselves). Since new states are going to be introduced in the near
future (to track symbol registration/initialization) it's worth changing the
convention pre-emptively to avoid further confusion.
llvm-svn: 363322
Summary:
dfsan_flush() allows to restart tain tracking from scratch in the same process.
The primary purpose right now is to allow more efficient data flow tracing
for DFT fuzzing: https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/issues/1632
Reviewers: pcc
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: delcypher, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63037
llvm-svn: 363321
I find the current documentation of poison somewhat confusing,
mainly because its use of "undefined behavior" doesn't seem to
align with our usual interpretation (of immediate UB). Especially
the sentence "any instruction that has a dependence on a poison
value has undefined behavior" is very confusing.
Clarify poison semantics by:
* Replacing the introductory paragraph with the standard rationale
for having poison values.
* Spelling out that instructions depending on poison return poison.
* Spelling out how we go from a poison value to immediate undefined
behavior and give the two examples we currently use in ValueTracking.
* Spelling out that side effects depending on poison are UB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63044
llvm-svn: 363320
Also add baseline tests to show effect of later patches.
There were a couple of regressions here that were never caught,
but my patch set that this is a preparation to will fix them.
This is the third attempt to land this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61150
llvm-svn: 363319
I recently got this wrong (again), and I'm sure I'm not the only one. Put a comment in the logical place someone would look to "fix" the obvious "missed optimization" which arrises based on the common misunderstanding. Hopefully, this will save others time. :)
llvm-svn: 363318
Summary:
This test fails to link shared libraries because tries to run
a copied version of clang-check to see if the mock version of libcxx
in the same directory can be loaded dynamically. Since the test is
specifically designed not to look in the default just-built lib
directory, it must be disabled when building with
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON.
Currently only disabling it on Darwin and basing it on the
enable_shared flag.
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61697
llvm-svn: 363298
Summary: The `OptionsView` class is currently protected. This constraint prevents tidies from passing the OptionsView to, for example, a helper function. Similarly, TransformerClangTidyCheck cannot pass the `OptionsView` object to functions that generate `tooling::RewriteRule`s. The latter is needed to allow the definition of such rules to depend on the clang-tidy options, as demonstrated in the child revision.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63287
llvm-svn: 363296
Summary:
When a variable is named in a context where we can't directly emit a
reference to it (because we don't know for sure that it's going to be
defined, or it's from an enclosing function and not captured, or the
reference might not "work" for some reason), we emit a copy of the
variable as a global and use that for the known-to-be-read-only access.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Subscribers: jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63157
llvm-svn: 363295
As pointed out by Nikita in D62625, BackedgeTakenCount is generally used to refer to the backedge taken count of the loop. A conditional backedge taken count - one which only applies if a particular exit is taken - is called a ExitCount in SCEV code, so be consistent here.
llvm-svn: 363293
This contains fixes for two cases where we might invalidate inbounds and leave it stale in the IR (a miscompile). Case 1 is when switching to an IV with no dynamically live uses, and case 2 is when doing pre-to-post conversion on the same pointer type IV.
The basic scheme used is to prove that using the given IV (pre or post increment forms) would have to already trigger UB on the path to the test we're modifying. As such, our potential UB triggering use does not change the semantics of the original program.
As was pointed out in the review thread by Nikita, this is defending against a separate issue from the hasConcreteDef case. This is about poison, that's about undef. Unfortunately, the two are different, see Nikita's comment for a fuller explanation, he explains it well.
(Note: I'm going to address Nikita's last style comment in a separate commit just to minimize chance of subtle bugs being introduced due to typos.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62939
llvm-svn: 363289
Alex Langford