Summary:
A follow-up on D34449:
* add `-std=c++11` to `.hpp` file by default.
* add constexpr function to test and doc.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34771
llvm-svn: 306650
Summary:
If the class being created in unique_ptr is in anonymous nampespace, the
anonymous namespace will be included in the apply-fixes. This patch fix
this.
```
namespace {
class Foo {};
}
std::unique_ptr<Foo> f;
f.reset(new Foo());
// Before the change: f = std::make_unique<(annonymous namespace)::Foo>();
// After the change: f = std::make_unique<Foo>();
```
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34286
llvm-svn: 306378
Summary:
A common source of security bugs is code that opens a file descriptors without using the O_CLOEXEC flag. (Without that flag, an opened sensitive file would remain open across a fork+exec to a lower-privileged SELinux domain, leaking that sensitive data.).
Add a new Android module and one checks in clang-tidy.
-- open(), openat(), and open64() should include O_CLOEXEC in their flags argument. [android-file-open-flag]
Links to part2 and part3:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33745https://reviews.llvm.org/D33747
Reviewers: chh, alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: alexfh, hokein
Subscribers: jbcoe, joerg, malcolm.parsons, Eugene.Zelenko, srhines, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits, krytarowski
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33304
llvm-svn: 306165
Summary:
The FP happens when a casting nullptr expression is used within a NULL-default-arguemnt cxx constructor.
Before the fix, the check will give a warning on nullptr when running
with the test case, which should not happen:
```
G(g(static_cast<char*>(nullptr)));
^~~~~~~~~~~
nullptr
```
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits, xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34524
llvm-svn: 306091
Summary:
A followup for D32942.
Malcolm Parsons has provided a valid testcase that the initial version of the check complained about nested `if`'s.
As it turns out, the culprit is the **partially** un-intentional `switch` fallthrough.
So rewrite the NestingThreshold logic without ab-using+mis-using that switch with fallthrough, and add testcases with nested `if`' where there should be a warning and shouldn't be a warning. This results in a cleaner, simpler code, too.
I guess, now it would be actually possible to pick some reasonable default for `NestingThreshold` setting.
Fixes PR33454.
Reviewers: malcolm.parsons, alexfh
Reviewed By: malcolm.parsons
Subscribers: sbenza, xazax.hun, cfe-commits, aaron.ballman
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34202
llvm-svn: 305554
Summary:
Finds compound statements which create next nesting level after `NestingThreshold` and emits a warning.
Do note that it warns about each compound statement that breaches the threshold, but not any of it's sub-statements, to have readable warnings.
I was able to find only one coding style referencing nesting:
- https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/process/coding-style.html#indentation
> In short, 8-char indents make things easier to read, and have the added benefit of warning you when you’re nesting your functions too deep.
This seems too basic, i'm not sure what else to test. Are more tests needed?
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, sbenza
Reviewed By: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32942
llvm-svn: 305082
Summary:
New checker to replace dynamic exception
specifications
This is an alternative to D18575 which relied on reparsing the decl to
find the location of dynamic exception specifications, but couldn't
deal with preprocessor conditionals correctly without reparsing the
entire file.
This approach uses D20428 to find dynamic exception specification
locations and handles all cases correctly.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: xazax.hun, mgehre, malcolm.parsons, mgorny, JDevlieghere, cfe-commits, Eugene.Zelenko, etienneb
Patch by Don Hinton!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20693
llvm-svn: 304977
Summary: "misc-noexcept-move-constructor" is better not to be issued when "-fno-exceptions" is set.
Reviewers: chh, alexfh, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits, xazax.hun
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34002
llvm-svn: 304949
Summary: clang-tidy is better not to issues this warning, which checks where the initializer for the object may throw an exception, when "-fno-exceptions" is used.
Reviewers: chh, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33917
llvm-svn: 304931
The check failed to match iterator->const_iterator conversion that is happening
at least when using the libstdc++'s vector. We might want to make it match even
more flexible patterns, if we see more false negatives.
llvm-svn: 304879
Added negated string literals to the set of IsAlwaysFalse expressions to avoid flagging of assert(!"msg").
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D33827
llvm-svn: 304657
Add a clang-tidy check for using func__/FUNCTION__ inside lambdas. This
evaluates to the string operator(), which is almost never useful and almost
certainly not what the author intended.
Patch by Bryce Liu!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33497
llvm-svn: 304570
MSVC doesn't support C++ operator names (using 'or' instead of ||,
'not' instead of '!', etc), so this was disabled in MSVC mode in r303798.
This fixes the regression noticed on the buildbots.
llvm-svn: 303872
With the change https://reviews.llvm.org/D33013 driver will not build
compilation object if command line is invalid, in particular, if
unrecognized option is provided. In such cases it will prints diagnostics
on stderr. The test 'clang-tidy/diagnostic.cpp' checks reaction on
unrecognized option and will fail when D33013 is applied because it checks
only stdout for test patterns and expects the name of diagnostic category
prepared by clang-tidy. With this change the test makes more general check
and must work in either case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33173
llvm-svn: 303735
Check BaseType before dereference.
Simplified test case is derived from Android Open Source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33430
llvm-svn: 303645
Summary:
This patch makes modernize-use-emplace remove unnecessary make_ calls from push_back calls and turn them into emplace_back -- the same way make_pair calls are handled.
Custom make_ calls can be removed for custom tuple-like types -- two new options that control that are `TupleTypes` and `TupleMakeFunctions`. By default, the check removes calls to `std::make_pair` and `std::make_tuple`.
Eq.
```
std::vector<std::tuple<int, char, bool>> v;
v.push_back(std::make_tuple(1, 'A', true)); // --> v.emplace_back(1, 'A', true);
```
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, Prazek, hokein
Reviewed By: Prazek
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, JonasToth, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32690
llvm-svn: 303145
Summary:
This patch makes modernize-use-emplace remove unnecessary make_ calls from push_back calls and turn them into emplace_back -- the same way make_pair calls are handled.
Custom make_ calls can be removed for custom tuple-like types -- two new options that control that are `TupleTypes` and `TupleMakeFunctions`. By default, the check removes calls to `std::make_pair` and `std::make_tuple`.
Eq.
```
std::vector<std::tuple<int, char, bool>> v;
v.push_back(std::make_tuple(1, 'A', true)); // --> v.emplace_back(1, 'A', true);
```
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, Prazek, hokein
Reviewed By: Prazek
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, JonasToth, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32690
llvm-svn: 303139
Summary:
C++14 added a couple of user-defined literals in the standard library. E.g.
std::chrono_literals and std::literals::chrono_literals . Using them
requires a using directive so do not warn in google-build-using-namespace
if namespace name starts with "std::" and ends with "literals".
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Patch by Martin Ejdestig!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33010
llvm-svn: 303085
Summary:
The statement **getArg** tries to get the first one without checking, which may cause segmentation fault.
Reviewers: chh, bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: cfe-commits, xazax.hun
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33103
llvm-svn: 303001
This check flags postfix operator++/-- declarations,
where the return type is not a const object.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32743
llvm-svn: 302637
The patch makes the check treat binary conditional operator (`x ?: y`), `while`
and regular `for` loops as conditional statements for the purpose of
AllowConditional*Cast options.
llvm-svn: 302431
Summary:
And also enable it by default to be consistent with e.g.
modernize-use-using.
This helps e.g. when running this check on cppunit client code where the
macro is provided by the system, so there is no easy way to modify it.
Reviewers: alexfh, malcolm.parsons
Reviewed By: malcolm.parsons
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32945
llvm-svn: 302429
modernize-use-equals-delete is extremely noisy in code using
DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN-style macros and there's no easy way to automatically
fix the warning when macros are in play.
llvm-svn: 302425
Summary:
This patch fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 | PR32896 ]].
The problem was that modernize-use-emplace incorrectly removed changed push_back into emplace_back, removing explicit constructor call with initializer list parameter, resulting in compiler error after applying fixits.
modernize-use-emplace used to check if matched constructor had InitListExpr, but didn't check against CXXStdInitializerListExpr.
Eg.
```
std::vector<std::vector<int>> v;
v.push_back(std::vector<int>({1})); // --> v.emplace_back({1});
```
Reviewers: Prazek, alexfh, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: Prazek, alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32767
llvm-svn: 302281
Summary:
When there is a push_back with a call to make_pair, turn it into emplace_back and remove the unnecessary make_pair call.
Eg.
```
std::vector<std::pair<int, int>> v;
v.push_back(std::make_pair(1, 2)); // --> v.emplace_back(1, 2);
```
make_pair doesn't get removed when explicit template parameters are provided, because of potential problems with type conversions.
Reviewers: Prazek, aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: Prazek, alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, JonasToth, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32395
llvm-svn: 301651
Summary:
The goal of this change is to fix the following suboptimal replacements currently suggested by clang-tidy:
```
// with MemberPrefix == "_"
int __foo; // accepted without complaint
```
```
// with MemberPrefix == "m_"
int _foo;
^~~~~~
m__foo
```
I fixed this by
- updating `matchesStyle()` to reject names which have a leading underscore after a prefix has already been stripped, or a trailing underscore if a suffix has already been stripped;
- updating `fixupWithStyle()` to strip leading & trailing underscores before adding the user-defined prefix and suffix.
The replacements are now:
```
// MemberPrefix == "_"
int __foo;
^~~~~~
_foo
```
```
// MemberPrefix == "m_"
int _foo;
^~~~~
m_foo
```
Future improvements might elect to add .clang-tidy flags to improve what is being stripped. For instance, stripping `m_` could allow `m_foo` to be automatically replaced with `_foo`.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Patch by Jacob Bandes-Storch!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32333
llvm-svn: 301431
This check will find occurrences of ``std::random_shuffle`` and replace it with ``std::shuffle``. In C++17 ``std::random_shuffle`` will no longer be available and thus we need to replace it.
Example of case that it fixes
```
std::vector<int> v;
// First example
std::random_shuffle(vec.begin(), vec.end());
```
Reviewers: hokein, aaron.ballman, alexfh, malcolm.parsons, mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30158
llvm-svn: 301167
Summary:
The "performance-inefficient-vector-operation" check finds vector oprations in
for-loop statements which may cause multiple memory reallocations.
This is the first version, only detects typical for-loop:
```
std::vector<int> v;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
v.push_back(i);
}
// or
for (int i = 0; i < v2.size(); ++i) {
v.push_back(v2[i]);
}
```
We can extend it to handle more cases like for-range loop in the future.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: zaks.anna, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, cfe-commits, djasper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31757
llvm-svn: 300534
- removed unnessacary namespaces
- added option to print warning in macros
- no fix for typedef with array
- removed "void" word from functions with 0 parameters
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29262
llvm-svn: 299340
Catch trivially true statements of the form a != 1 || a != 3. Statements like
these are likely errors. They are particularly easy to miss when handling enums:
enum State {
RUNNING,
STOPPED,
STARTING,
ENDING
}
...
if (state != RUNNING || state != STARTING)
...
Patch by Blaise Watson!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29858
llvm-svn: 298607
This commit renames all of the safety functionality to be hicpp, adds an appropriate LICENSE.TXT, and updates the documentation accordingly.
llvm-svn: 298229
Summary:
There is no need for triggering warning when noexcept specifier in move constructor or move-assignment operator is neither evaluated nor uninstantiated.
This fixes bug reported here: bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24712
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JonasToth, JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Marek Jenda!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31049
llvm-svn: 298101
Summary:
I've added a test case that (without the fix) triggers the assertion,
which happens when a move happens in an implicitly called conversion
operator.
This patch also fixes nondeterministic behavior in the source code
location reported for the move when the move is constained in an init list;
this was causing buildbot failures in the previous attempt to submit
this patch (see D30569 and rL297004).
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30650
llvm-svn: 297272
Summary:
I've added a test case that (without the fix) triggers the assertion,
which happens when a move happens in an implicitly called conversion
operator.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30569
llvm-svn: 297004
* suggest static_cast instead of reinterpret_cast for casts from void*
* top-level const doesn't need a const_cast
* don't emit a separate "possibly redundant cast" warning, instead suggest
static_cast (in C++ only) and add a little hint to consider removing the cast
llvm-svn: 296753
Summary:
Hello everybody,
this is an incremental patch for the NoMalloc-Checker I wrote. It allows to configure the memory-management functions, that are checked,
This might be helpful for a code base with custom functions in use, or non-standard functionality, like posix_memalign.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: sbenza, nemanjai, JDevlieghere
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Jonas Toth!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28239
llvm-svn: 296734
Summary:
Add an option to function-size to warn about high parameter counts.
This might be relevant for cppcoreguidelines and the safety module as well. Since the safety module is not landed in master already, i did not create an alias, but that can be done later as well.
Reviewers: sbenza, alexfh, hokein
Reviewed By: alexfh, hokein
Subscribers: JDevlieghere
Patch by Jonas Toth!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29561
llvm-svn: 296599
Summary:
Fix generated by modernize-use-override caused syntax error when method
used try-statement as a body. `override` keyword was inserted after last
declaration token which happened to be a `try` keyword.
This fixes PR27119.
Reviewers: ehsan, djasper, alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Paweł Żukowski!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30002
llvm-svn: 296598
Summary:
This flag allows specifying a custom path for the compilation
database. Unfortunately we can't use the -p flag like other
clang-tidy tools because it's already taken.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29806
llvm-svn: 295482
Summary:
Replaces explicit calls to the constructor in a return with a braced
initializer list. This way the return type is not needlessly duplicated in the
return type and the return statement.
```
Foo bar() {
Baz baz;
return Foo(baz);
}
// transforms to:
Foo bar() {
Baz baz;
return {baz};
}
```
Reviewers: hokein, Prazek, aaron.ballman, alexfh
Reviewed By: Prazek, aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: malcolm.parsons, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28768
llvm-svn: 295199
Summary:
The misc-unconventional-assign-operator check had a false positive
warning when the 'operator*' in 'return *this' was unresolved.
Change matcher to allow calls to unresolved operator.
Fixes PR31531.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29393
llvm-svn: 295176
Summary:
Users might get confused easily when they see the check's message on
full template function speciliations.
Add a note to the output message, which mentions these kind of function
specializations are treated as regular functions.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29928
llvm-svn: 295048
I have made a small fix for readability-delete-null-pointer check so it also checks for class members.
Example of case that it fixes
```
struct A {
void foo() {
if(mp)
delete mp;
}
int *mp;
};
```
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aaron.ballman, alexfh, malcolm.parsons
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29726
llvm-svn: 294912
Haojian Wu