The former is redundant because the later carries it as part of
its builder. Add a getContext() helper method to DialectAsmParser
to make this more convenient, and stop passing the context around
explicitly. This simplifies ODS generated parser hooks for attrs
and types.
This resolves PR51985
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110796
This enables querying shapes/values as shapes without mutating the IR
directly (e.g., towards enabling doing inference in analysis &
application steps, inferring function shape with constant from callsite,
...). Add a new ShapeAdaptor that abstracts over whether shape is from
Type or ShapedTypeComponents or DenseIntElementsAttribute. This adds new
accessors to ValueShapeRange to get Shape and value as shape, but
doesn't restrict or remove the previous way of accessing Type via the
Value for now, that does mean a less refined shape could be accidentally
queried and will be restricted in follow up.
Currently restricted Value query to what can be represented as Shape. So
only supports cases where constant subgraph evaluation's output is a
shape. I had considered making it more general, but without TBD extern
attribute concept or some such a user cannot today uniformly avoid
overhead.
Update TOSA ops and also the shape inference pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107768
Operations currently rely on the string name of attributes during attribute lookup/removal/replacement, in build methods, and more. This unfortunately means that some of the most used APIs in MLIR require string comparisons, additional hashing(+mutex locking) to construct Identifiers, and more. This revision remedies this by caching identifiers for all of the attributes of the operation in its corresponding AbstractOperation. Just updating the autogenerated usages brings up to a 15% reduction in compile time, greatly reducing the cost of interacting with the attributes of an operation. This number can grow even higher as we use these methods in handwritten C++ code.
Methods for accessing these cached identifiers are exposed via `<attr-name>AttrName` methods on the derived operation class. Moving forward, users should generally use these methods over raw strings when an attribute name is necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104167
Even if the layout specification is missing from an op that supports it, the op
is still expected to provide meaningful responses to data layout queries.
Forward them to the op instead of directly calling the default implementation.
Depends On D98524
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98525
This is useful for bit-packing types such as vectors and tuples as well as for
exotic architectures that have non-8-bit bytes.
Depends On D98500
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98524
Data layout information allows to answer questions about the size and alignment
properties of a type. It enables, among others, the generation of various
linear memory addressing schemes for containers of abstract types and deeper
reasoning about vectors. This introduces the subsystem for modeling data
layouts in MLIR.
The data layout subsystem is designed to scale to MLIR's open type and
operation system. At the top level, it consists of attribute interfaces that
can be implemented by concrete data layout specifications; type interfaces that
should be implemented by types subject to data layout; operation interfaces
that must be implemented by operations that can serve as data layout scopes
(e.g., modules); and dialect interfaces for data layout properties unrelated to
specific types. Built-in types are handled specially to decrease the overall
query cost.
A concrete default implementation of these interfaces is provided in the new
Target dialect. Defaults for built-in types that match the current behavior are
also provided.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97067
Mehdi Amini