The changes to InstCombine (& SCEV) do seem a bit silly - it doesn't make
anything obviously better to have the caller access the pointers element
type (the thing I'm trying to remove) than the GEP itself, but it's a
helpful migration step. This will allow me to more obviously lock down
GEP (& Load, etc) API usage, then fix all the code that accesses pointer
element types except the places that need to be removed (most of the
InstCombines) anyway - at which point I'll need to just remove all that
code because it won't be meaningful anymore (there will be no pointer
types, so no bitcasts to combine)
SCEV looks like it'll need some restructuring - we'll have to do a bit
more work for GEP canonicalization, since it'll depend on how it's used
if we can even manage to canonicalize it to a non-ugly GEP. I guess we
can do some fun stuff like voting (do 2 out of 3 load from the GEP with
a certain type that gives a pretty GEP? Does every typed use of the GEP
use either a specific type or a generic type (i8*, etc)?)
llvm-svn: 233131
Simplify boolean expressions using `true` and `false` with `clang-tidy`
Patch by Richard Thomson.
Reviewed By: nlewycky
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8528
llvm-svn: 233091
Currently this is only used to tweak the backend's memcpy inlining
heuristics, testing that isn't very helpful. A real test case will
follow in the next commit, where this behavior would cause a real
miscompilation.
llvm-svn: 232895
r216771 introduced a change to MemoryDependenceAnalysis that allowed it
to reason about acquire/release operations. However, this change does
not ensure that the acquire/release operations pair. Unfortunately,
this leads to miscompiles as we won't see an acquire load as properly
memory effecting. This largely reverts r216771.
This fixes PR22708.
llvm-svn: 232889
When estimating SROA savings, we want to see if an address is derived
off an alloca in the caller. For store instructions, operand 1 is the
address operand, but the current code uses operand 0. Use
getPointerOperand for loads and stores to fix this.
Patch by Easwaran Raman.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8425
llvm-svn: 232827
Summary:
This change teaches isImpliedCond to infer things like "X sgt 0" => "X -
1 sgt -1". The `ConstantRange` class has the logic to do the heavy
lifting, this change simply gets ScalarEvolution to exploit that when
reasonable.
Depends on D8345
Reviewers: atrick
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8346
llvm-svn: 232576
Summary:
This change splits `makeICmpRegion` into `makeAllowedICmpRegion` and
`makeSatisfyingICmpRegion` with slightly different contracts. The first
one is useful for determining what values some expression //may// take,
given that a certain `icmp` evaluates to true. The second one is useful
for determining what values are guaranteed to //satisfy// a given
`icmp`.
Reviewers: nlewycky
Reviewed By: nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8345
llvm-svn: 232575
Also, add several entries to vectorizable functions table, and
corresponding tests. The table isn't complete, it'll be populated later.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8131
llvm-svn: 232531
Given that the stated purpose of `CheckFailed()` is to provide a nice
spot for a breakpoint, it'd be nice not to have to use a regex to break
on it. Recover the ability to simply use `b CheckFailed` by
specializing the message-only version, and by changing the variadic
version to call into the message-only version.
llvm-svn: 232268
Summary:
ScalarEvolutionExpander assumes that the header block of a loop is a
legal place to have a use for a phi node. This is true only for phis
that are either in the header or dominate the header block, but it is
not true for phi nodes that are strictly internal to the loop body.
This change teaches ScalarEvolutionExpander to place uses of PHI nodes
in the basic block the PHI nodes belong to. This is always legal, and
`hoistIVInc` ensures that the said position dominates `IsomorphicInc`.
Reviewers: atrick
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8311
llvm-svn: 232189
There's a missed optimization opportunity where we could look at the full chain of computation and take the intersection of the flags instead of only looking one instruction deep.
llvm-svn: 232134
Instead, run both EH preparation passes, and have them both ignore
functions with unrecognized EH personalities. Pass delegation involved
some hacky code for creating an AnalysisResolver that we don't need now.
llvm-svn: 231995
This patch adds limited support in ValueTracking for inferring known bits of a value from conditional expressions which must be true to reach the instruction we're trying to optimize. At this time, the feature is off by default. Once landed, I'm hoping for feedback from others on both profitability and compile time impact.
Forms of conditional value propagation have been tried in LLVM before and have failed due to compile time problems. In an attempt to side step that, this patch only considers conditions where the edge leaving the branch dominates the context instruction. It does not attempt full dataflow. Even with that restriction, it handles many interesting cases:
* Early exits from functions
* Early exits from loops (for context instructions in the loop and after the check)
* Conditions which control entry into loops, including multi-version loops (such as those produced during vectorization, IRCE, loop unswitch, etc..)
Possible applications include optimizing using information provided by constructs such as: preconditions, assumptions, null checks, & range checks.
This patch implements two approaches to the problem that need further benchmarking. Approach 1 is to directly walk the dominator tree looking for interesting conditions. Approach 2 is to inspect other uses of the value being queried for interesting comparisons. From initial benchmarking, it appears that Approach 2 is faster than Approach 1, but this needs to be further validated.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7708
llvm-svn: 231879
The debug message was pretty confusing here. It only reported the
situation with memchecks without the result of the dependence analysis.
Now it prints whether the loop is safe from the POV of the dependence
analysis and if yes, whether we need memchecks.
llvm-svn: 231854
This is the final patch that actually introduces the new parameter of
partition mapping to RuntimePointerCheck::needsChecking.
Another API (LAI::getInstructionsForAccess) is also exposed that helps
to map pointers to instructions because ultimately we partition
instructions.
The WIP version of the Loop Distribution pass in D6930 has been adapted
to use all this. See for example, how
InstrPartitionContainer::computePartitionSetForPointers sets up the
partitions using the above API and then calls to LAI::addRuntimeCheck
with the pointer partitions.
llvm-svn: 231818
Now the analysis won't "fail" if the memchecks exceed the threshold. It
is the transform pass' responsibility to perform the check.
This allows the transform pass to further analyze/eliminate the
memchecks. E.g. in Loop distribution we only need to check pointers
that end up in different partitions.
Note that there is a slight change of functionality here. The logic in
analyzeLoop is that if dependence checking fails due to non-constant
distance between the pointers, another attempt is made to prove safety
of the dependences purely using run-time checks.
Before this patch we could fail the loop due to exceeding the memcheck
threshold after the first step, now we only check the threshold in the
client after the full analysis. There is no measurable compile-time
effect but I wanted to record this here.
llvm-svn: 231817
The check for the number of memchecks will be moved to the client of
this analysis. Besides allowing for transform-specific thresholds, this
also lets Loop Distribution post-process the memchecks; Loop
Distribution only needs memchecks between pointers of different
partitions.
The motivation for this first patch is to untangle the CanDoRT check
from the NumComparison check before moving the NumComparison part.
CanDoRT means that we couldn't determine the bounds for the pointer.
Note that NumComparison is set independent of this flag.
llvm-svn: 231816
The dependences are now expose through the new getInterestingDependences
API so we can use that with -analyze too and fix the FIXME.
This lets us remove the test that relied on -debug to check the
dependences.
llvm-svn: 231807
Gather an array of interesting dependences rather than just failing
after the first unsafe one and regarding the loop unsafe. Loop
Distribution needs to be able to collect all dependences in order to
isolate the dependence cycles into their own partition.
Since the dependence checking algorithm is quadratic in terms of
accesses sharing the same underlying pointer, I am applying a cut-off
threshold (MaxInterestingDependence). Exceeding that, the logic reverts
back to the original approach deeming the loop unsafe upon encountering
the first unsafe dependence.
The main idea of the patch is to split isDepedent from directly
answering the question whether the dep is safe for vectorization to
return a dependence type which then gets mapped to old boolean result
using Dependence::isSafeForVectorization.
Tested that this was compile-time neutral on SpecINT2006 LTO bitcode
inputs. No assembly change on the testsuite including external.
llvm-svn: 231806
LoopDistribution needs to query various results of the dependence
analysis. This series will expose some more APIs and state of the
dependence checker.
This patch is a simple one to just expose the DepChecker instance. The
set is compile-time neutral measured with LTO bitcode files of
SpecINT2006. Also there is no assembly change on the testsuite.
llvm-svn: 231805
This crash occurs due to memory corruption when trying to update dependency
direction based on Constraints.
This crash was observed during lnt regression of Polybench benchmark test case dynprog.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8059
llvm-svn: 231788
This crash in Dependency analysis is because we assume here that in case of UsefulGEP
both source and destination have the same number of operands which may not be true.
This incorrect assumption results in crash while populating Pairs. Fix the same.
This crash was observed during lnt regression for code such as-
struct s{
int A[10][10];
int C[10][10][10];
} S;
void dep_constraint_crash_test(int k,int N) {
for( int i=0;i<N;i++)
for( int j=0;j<N;j++)
S.A[0][0] = S.C[0][0][k];
}
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8162
llvm-svn: 231784
CFLAA didn't know how to properly handle ConstantExprs; it would silently
ignore them. This was a problem if the ConstantExpr is, say, a GEP of a global,
because CFLAA wouldn't realize that there's a global there. :)
llvm-svn: 231743
We now treat pointers given to ptrtoint and pointers retrieved from
inttoptr as similar to arguments or globals (can alias anything, etc.)
This solves some of the problems we were having with giving incorrect
results.
llvm-svn: 231741
Summary:
Now that the DataLayout is a mandatory part of the module, let's start
cleaning the codebase. This patch is a first attempt at doing that.
This patch is not exactly NFC as for instance some places were passing
a nullptr instead of the DataLayout, possibly just because there was a
default value on the DataLayout argument to many functions in the API.
Even though it is not purely NFC, there is no change in the
validation.
I turned as many pointer to DataLayout to references, this helped
figuring out all the places where a nullptr could come up.
I had initially a local version of this patch broken into over 30
independant, commits but some later commit were cleaning the API and
touching part of the code modified in the previous commits, so it
seemed cleaner without the intermediate state.
Test Plan:
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 231740
Summary:
This removes some duplicated code, and also helps optimization: e.g. in
the test case added, `%idx ULT 128` in `@x` is not currently optimized
to `true` by `-indvars` but will be, after this change.
The only functional change in ths commit is that for add recurrences,
ScalarEvolution::getRange will be more aggressive -- computing the
unsigned (resp. signed) range for a SCEVAddRecExpr will now look at the
NSW (resp. NUW) bits and check for signed (resp. unsigned) overflow.
This can be a strict improvement in some cases (such as the attached
test case), and should be no worse in other cases.
Reviewers: atrick, nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8142
llvm-svn: 231709
Summary:
Unused in this commit, but will be used in a subsequent change (D8142)
by a FileCheck test.
Reviewers: atrick
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8143
llvm-svn: 231708
Summary:
See the two test cases.
; Can fold fcmp with undef on one side by choosing NaN for the undef
; Can fold fcmp with undef on both side
; fcmp u_pred undef, undef -> true
; fcmp o_pred undef, undef -> false
; because whatever you choose for the first undef
; you can choose NaN for the other undef
Reviewers: hfinkel, chandlerc, majnemer
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7617
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 231626
-debug-pass is not specified, as the string is only used when dumping pass
information. There is a big cost of determining the name in
ReginBase<Tr>:getNameStr() if the region's entry or exit block doesn't have a
name. This is the case for the Release build, as names are not preserved by the
front-end.
RegionPass is mainly used by Polly, resulting in long compile time for one file
of a customer application with the Release build (1m24s) vs Release+Asserts
build (10s) when Polly is used. With this change, the compile time with the
Release build went down to 8s.
Patch by Sanjin Sijaric <ssijaric@codeaurora.org>!
Phabricator: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8076
llvm-svn: 231485
Summary:
Teach SCEV to prove no overflow for an add recurrence by proving
something about the range of another add recurrence a loop-invariant
distance away from it.
Reviewers: atrick, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7980
llvm-svn: 231305
Summary:
DataLayout keeps the string used for its creation.
As a side effect it is no longer needed in the Module.
This is "almost" NFC, the string is no longer
canonicalized, you can't rely on two "equals" DataLayout
having the same string returned by getStringRepresentation().
Get rid of DataLayoutPass: the DataLayout is in the Module
The DataLayout is "per-module", let's enforce this by not
duplicating it more than necessary.
One more step toward non-optionality of the DataLayout in the
module.
Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the Module
Module->getDataLayout() will never returns nullptr anymore.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: resistor, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7992
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 231270
Summary:
This makes it more obvious that the enum definition and the
"StandardName" array is in sync. Mechanically refactored w/ a
python script.
Test Plan: still compiles
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7845
llvm-svn: 231172
Summary:
This does not conceptually belongs here. Instead provide a shortcut
getModule() that provides access to the DataLayout.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8027
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 231147
Accidentally committed a few more of these cleanup changes than
intended. Still breaking these out & tidying them up.
This reverts commit r231135.
llvm-svn: 231136
There doesn't seem to be any need to assert that iterator assignment is
between iterators over the same node - if you want to reuse an iterator
variable to iterate another node, that's perfectly acceptable. Just
don't mix comparisons between iterators into disjoint sequences, as
usual.
llvm-svn: 231135
Move the specialized metadata nodes for the new debug info hierarchy
into place, finishing off PR22464. I've done bootstraps (and all that)
and I'm confident this commit is NFC as far as DWARF output is
concerned. Let me know if I'm wrong :).
The code changes are fairly mechanical:
- Bumped the "Debug Info Version".
- `DIBuilder` now creates the appropriate subclass of `MDNode`.
- Subclasses of DIDescriptor now expect to hold their "MD"
counterparts (e.g., `DIBasicType` expects `MDBasicType`).
- Deleted a ton of dead code in `AsmWriter.cpp` and `DebugInfo.cpp`
for printing comments.
- Big update to LangRef to describe the nodes in the new hierarchy.
Feel free to make it better.
Testcase changes are enormous. There's an accompanying clang commit on
its way.
If you have out-of-tree debug info testcases, I just broke your build.
- `upgrade-specialized-nodes.sh` is attached to PR22564. I used it to
update all the IR testcases.
- Unfortunately I failed to find way to script the updates to CHECK
lines, so I updated all of these by hand. This was fairly painful,
since the old CHECKs are difficult to reason about. That's one of
the benefits of the new hierarchy.
This work isn't quite finished, BTW. The `DIDescriptor` subclasses are
almost empty wrappers, but not quite: they still have loose casting
checks (see the `RETURN_FROM_RAW()` macro). Once they're completely
gutted, I'll rename the "MD" classes to "DI" and kill the wrappers. I
also expect to make a few schema changes now that it's easier to reason
about everything.
llvm-svn: 231082
This work is currently being rethought along different lines and
if this work is needed it can be resurrected out of svn. Remove it
for now as no current work in ongoing on it and it's unused. Verified
with the authors before removal.
llvm-svn: 230780
It is not sound to mark the increment operation as `nuw` or `nsw`
based on a proof off of the add recurrence if the increment operation
we emit happens to be a `sub` instruction.
I could not come up with a test case for this -- the cases where
SCEVExpander decides to emit a `sub` instruction is quite small, and I
cannot think of a way I'd be able to get SCEV to prove that the
increment does not overflow in those cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7899
llvm-svn: 230673
accesses are via different types
Noticed this while generalizing the code for loop distribution.
I confirmed with Arnold that this was indeed a bug and managed to create
a testcase.
llvm-svn: 230647
Also remove the somewhat misleading initializers from
VectorizationFactor and VectorizationInterleave. They will get
initialized with the default ctor since no cl::init is provided.
llvm-svn: 230608
(The change was landed in r230280 and caused the regression PR22674.
This version contains a fix and a test-case for PR22674).
When emitting the increment operation, SCEVExpander marks the
operation as nuw or nsw based on the flags on the preincrement SCEV.
This is incorrect because, for instance, it is possible that {-6,+,1}
is <nuw> while {-6,+,1}+1 = {-5,+,1} is not.
This change teaches SCEV to mark the increment as nuw/nsw only if it
can explicitly prove that the increment operation won't overflow.
Apart from the attached test case, another (more realistic)
manifestation of the bug can be seen in
Transforms/IndVarSimplify/pr20680.ll.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7778
llvm-svn: 230533
With a diabolically crafted test case, we could recurse
through this code and return true instead of false.
The larger engineering crime is the use of magic numbers.
Added FIXME comments for those.
llvm-svn: 230515
The bug was a result of getPreStartForExtend interpreting nsw/nuw
flags on an add recurrence more strongly than is legal. {S,+,X}<nsw>
implies S+X is nsw only if the backedge of the loop is taken at least
once.
NOTE: I had accidentally committed an unrelated change with the commit
message of this change in r230275 (r230275 was reverted in r230279).
This is the correct change for this commit message.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7808
llvm-svn: 230291
When emitting the increment operation, SCEVExpander marks the
operation as nuw or nsw based on the flags on the preincrement SCEV.
This is incorrect because, for instance, it is possible that {-6,+,1}
is <nuw> while {-6,+,1}+1 = {-5,+,1} is not.
This change teaches SCEV to mark the increment as nuw/nsw only if it
can explicitly prove that the increment operation won't overflow.
Apart from the attached test case, another (more realistic) manifestation
of the bug can be seen in Transforms/IndVarSimplify/pr20680.ll.
NOTE: this change was landed with an incorrect commit message in
rL230275 and was reverted for that reason in rL230279. This commit
message is the correct one.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7778
llvm-svn: 230280
230275 got committed with an incorrect commit message due to a mixup
on my side. Will re-land in a few moments with the correct commit
message.
llvm-svn: 230279
The bug was a result of getPreStartForExtend interpreting nsw/nuw
flags on an add recurrence more strongly than is legal. {S,+,X}<nsw>
implies S+X is nsw only if the backedge of the loop is taken at least
once.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7808
llvm-svn: 230275
This patch adds the isProfitableToHoist API. For AArch64, we want to prevent a
fmul from being hoisted in cases where it is more profitable to form a
fmsub/fmadd.
Phabricator Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7299
Patch by Lawrence Hu <lawrence@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 230241
The LoopInfo in combination with depth_first is used to enumerate the
loops.
Right now -analyze is not yet complete. It only prints the result of
the analysis, the report and the run-time checks. Printing the unsafe
depedences will require a bit more reshuffling which I'd like to do in a
follow-on to this patchset. Unsafe dependences are currently checked
via -debug-only=loop-accesses in the new test.
This is part of the patchset that converts LoopAccessAnalysis into an
actual analysis pass.
llvm-svn: 229898
The only difference between these two is that VectorizerReport adds a
vectorizer-specific prefix to its messages. When LAA is used in the
vectorizer context the prefix is added when we promote the
LoopAccessReport into a VectorizerReport via one of the constructors.
This is part of the patchset that converts LoopAccessAnalysis into an
actual analysis pass.
llvm-svn: 229897
When I split out LoopAccessReport from this, I need to create some temps
so constness becomes necessary.
This is part of the patchset that converts LoopAccessAnalysis into an
actual analysis pass.
llvm-svn: 229896
This allows the analysis to be attempted with any loop. This feature
will be used with -analysis. (LV only requests the analysis on loops
that have already satisfied these tests.)
This is part of the patchset that converts LoopAccessAnalysis into an
actual analysis pass.
llvm-svn: 229895
Also add pass name as an argument to VectorizationReport::emitAnalysis.
This is part of the patchset that converts LoopAccessAnalysis into an
actual analysis pass.
llvm-svn: 229894
This is a function pass that runs the analysis on demand. The analysis
can be initiated by querying the loop access info via LAA::getInfo. It
either returns the cached info or runs the analysis.
Symbolic stride information continues to reside outside of this analysis
pass. We may move it inside later but it's not a priority for me right
now. The idea is that Loop Distribution won't support run-time stride
checking at least initially.
This means that when querying the analysis, symbolic stride information
can be provided optionally. Whether stride information is used can
invalidate the cache entry and rerun the analysis. Note that if the
loop does not have any symbolic stride, the entry should be preserved
across Loop Distribution and LV.
Since currently the only user of the pass is LV, I just check that the
symbolic stride information didn't change when using a cached result.
On the LV side, LoopVectorizationLegality requests the info object
corresponding to the loop from the analysis pass. A large chunk of the
diff is due to LAI becoming a pointer from a reference.
A test will be added as part of the -analyze patch.
Also tested that with AVX, we generate identical assembly output for the
testsuite (including the external testsuite) before and after.
This is part of the patchset that converts LoopAccessAnalysis into an
actual analysis pass.
llvm-svn: 229893
LAA will be an on-demand analysis pass, so we need to cache the result
of the analysis. canVectorizeMemory is renamed to analyzeLoop which
computes the result. canVectorizeMemory becomes the query function for
the cached result.
This is part of the patchset that converts LoopAccessAnalysis into an
actual analysis pass.
llvm-svn: 229892
The transformation passes will query this and then emit them as part of
their own report. The currently only user LV is modified to do just
that.
This is part of the patchset that converts LoopAccessAnalysis into an
actual analysis pass.
llvm-svn: 229891
As LAA is becoming a pass, we can no longer pass the params to its
constructor. This changes the command line flags to have external
storage. These can now be accessed both from LV and LAA.
VectorizerParams is moved out of LoopAccessInfo in order to shorten the
code to access it.
This commits also has the fix (D7731) to the break dependence cycle
between the analysis and vector libraries.
This is part of the patchset that converts LoopAccessAnalysis into an
actual analysis pass.
llvm-svn: 229890
This reverts commit r229651.
I'd like to ultimately revert r229650 but this reformat stands in the
way. I'll reformat the affected files once the the loop-access pass is
fully committed.
llvm-svn: 229889
r229622: "[LoopAccesses] Make VectorizerParams global"
r229623: "[LoopAccesses] Stash the report from the analysis rather than emitting it"
r229624: "[LoopAccesses] Cache the result of canVectorizeMemory"
r229626: "[LoopAccesses] Create the analysis pass"
r229628: "[LoopAccesses] Change debug messages from LV to LAA"
r229630: "[LoopAccesses] Add canAnalyzeLoop"
r229631: "[LoopAccesses] Add missing const to APIs in VectorizationReport"
r229632: "[LoopAccesses] Split out LoopAccessReport from VectorizerReport"
r229633: "[LoopAccesses] Add -analyze support"
r229634: "[LoopAccesses] Change LAA:getInfo to return a constant reference"
r229638: "Analysis: fix buildbots"
llvm-svn: 229650
This should fix the compilation failure on the MSVC buildbots which find a
std::make_unique and llvm::make_unique via ADL, resulting in ambiguity.
llvm-svn: 229638
David Blaikie