As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.
The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422
llvm-svn: 319665
This re-commits everything that was pulled in r314244. The transformation
is off by default (patch to enable it to follow). The code is refactored
to have a single entry-point and provide fine-grained control over patterns
that it selects. This patch also fixes the bugs in the original code.
Everything that failed with the original patch has been re-tested with this
patch (with the transformation turned on). So the patch to turn this on is
soon to follow.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38575
llvm-svn: 319434
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, avoid
printing "vreg" for virtual registers (which is one of the current MIR
possibilities).
Basically:
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E "s/%vreg([0-9]+)/%\1/g"
* grep -nr '%vreg' . and fix if needed
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E "s/ vreg([0-9]+)/ %\1/g"
* grep -nr 'vreg[0-9]\+' . and fix if needed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40420
llvm-svn: 319427
- add -ppc-reg-with-percent-prefix option to use %r3 etc as register
names
- split off logic for Darwinish verbose conditional codes into a helper
function
- be explicit about Darwin vs AIX vs GNUish assembler flavors
Based on the patch from Alexandre Yukio Yamashita
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39016
llvm-svn: 319381
Separate the handling of AND/AND8 out from PHI/OR/ISEL checking. The reasoning
is the others need all their operands to be sign/zero extended for their output
to also be sign/zero extended. This is true for AND and sign-extension, but for
zero-extension we only need at least one of the input operands to be zero
extended for the result to also be zero extended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39078
llvm-svn: 319289
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always print registers as lowercase.
* Only debug printing is affected. It now follows MIR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40417
llvm-svn: 319187
This patch adds a peep hole optimization to remove any redundant toc save
instructions added as part of the call sequence for indirect calls. It removes
any toc saves within a function that are dominated by another toc save.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39736
llvm-svn: 319087
This patch extends on to rL307174 to not use the power9 vector extract with
variable index instructions when extracting word element 1. For such cases,
the existing selection of MFVSRWZ provides a better sequence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38287
llvm-svn: 319049
The VSX versions have the advantage of a full 64-register target whereas the FP
ones have the advantage of lower latency and higher throughput. So what we’re
after is using the faster instructions in low register pressure situations and
using the larger register file in high register pressure situations.
The heuristic chooses between the following 7 pairs of instructions.
PPC::LXSSPX vs PPC::LFSX
PPC::LXSDX vs PPC::LFDX
PPC::STXSSPX vs PPC::STFSX
PPC::STXSDX vs PPC::STFDX
PPC::LXSIWAX vs PPC::LFIWAX
PPC::LXSIWZX vs PPC::LFIWZX
PPC::STXSIWX vs PPC::STFIWX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38486
llvm-svn: 318651
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
This patch changes all i32 constant in store instruction to i64 with truncation, to increase the chance that the referenced constant can be shared with other i64 constant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39352
llvm-svn: 318436
Summary:
Make it possible to feed runtime information back to tablegen to enable
profile-guided tablegen-eration, detection of untested tablegen definitions, etc.
Being a cross-compiler by nature, LLVM will potentially collect data for multiple
architectures (e.g. when running 'ninja check'). We therefore need a way for
TableGen to figure out what data applies to the backend it is generating at the
time. This patch achieves that by including the name of the 'def X : Target ...'
for the backend in the TargetRegistry.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, jyknight, aditya_nandakumar, sdardis, nemanjai, ab, nhaehnle, t.p.northover, javed.absar, qcolombet, llvm-commits, fedor.sergeev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39742
llvm-svn: 318352
Implements TargetLowering callback 'mayBeEmittedAsTailCall' that enables
CodeGenPrepare to duplicate returns when they might enable a tail-call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39777
llvm-svn: 318321
Move the calling convention checks for tail-call eligibility for the 64-bit
SysV ABI into a separate function. This is so that it can be shared with
'mayBeEmittedAsTailCall' in a subsequent change.
llvm-svn: 318305
This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
llvm-svn: 317647
This header already includes a CodeGen header and is implemented in
lib/CodeGen, so move the header there to match.
This fixes a link error with modular codegeneration builds - where a
header and its implementation are circularly dependent and so need to be
in the same library, not split between two like this.
llvm-svn: 317379
Revert r316478.
A test case has failed.
Will recommit this change once we find and fix the failure.
This reverts commit 7c330fabaedaba3d02c58bc3cc1198896c895f34.
llvm-svn: 316952
Summary: The two 32-bit words were swapped. Update a test omitted in reverted r316270.
Reviewers: jtony, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39163
llvm-svn: 316916
- Targets that want to support memcmp expansions now return the list of
supported load sizes.
- Expansion codegen does not assume that all power-of-two load sizes
smaller than the max load size are valid. For examples, this is not the
case for x86(32bit)+sse2.
Fixes PR34887.
llvm-svn: 316905
Currently a record-form instruction is used for comparison of "greater than -1" and "less than 1" by modifying the predicate (e.g. LT 1 into LE 0) in addition to the naive case of comparison against 0.
This patch also enables emitting a record-form instruction for "less than or equal to -1" (i.e. "less than 0") and "greater than or equal to 1" (i.e. "greater than 0") to increase the optimization opportunities.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38941
llvm-svn: 316647
If we have the situation where a Swap feeds a Splat we can sometimes change the
index on the Splat and then remove the Swap instruction.
Fixed the test case that was failing and recommit after pulling the original
commit.
Original revision is here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39009
llvm-svn: 316478
If we have the situation where a Swap feeds a Splat we can sometimes change the
index on the Splat and then remove the Swap instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39009
llvm-svn: 316366
The commit at https://reviews.llvm.org/rL315888 is causing some failures
with internal testing. Disabling this code until we can resolve the issues.
llvm-svn: 316199
Helper functions to identify sign- and zero-extending machine instruction is introduced in rL315888.
This patch makes PPCInstrInfo::optimizeCompareInstr use the helper functions. It simplifies the code and also makes possible more optimizations since the helper can do more analysis than the original check code; I observed about 5000 more compare instructions are eliminated while building LLVM.
Also, this patch fixes a bug in helpers on ANDIo instruction handling due to the order of checks. This bug causes a failure in an existing test case for optimizeCompareInstr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38988
llvm-svn: 316071
This patch enables redundant sign- and zero-extension elimination in PowerPC MI Peephole pass.
If the input value of a sign- or zero-extension is known to be already sign- or zero-extended, the operation is redundant and can be eliminated.
One common case is sign-extensions for a method parameter or for a method return value; they must be sign- or zero-extended as defined in PPC ELF ABI.
For example of the following simple code, two extsw instructions are generated before the invocation of int_func and before the return. With this patch, both extsw are eliminated.
void int_func(int);
void ii_test(int a) {
if (a & 1) return int_func(a);
}
Such redundant sign- or zero-extensions are quite common in many programs; e.g. I observed about 60,000 occurrences of the elimination while compiling the LLVM+CLANG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31319
llvm-svn: 315888
This is only currently used for mad/fma transforms.
This is the only case where it should be used for AMDGPU,
so add an opcode to be sure.
llvm-svn: 315740
Reverting to investigate layering effects of MCJIT not linking
libCodeGen but using TargetMachine::getNameWithPrefix() breaking the
lldb bots.
This reverts commit r315633.
llvm-svn: 315637
Merge LLVMTargetMachine into TargetMachine.
- There is no in-tree target anymore that just implements TargetMachine
but not LLVMTargetMachine.
- It should still be possible to stub out all the various functions in
case a target does not want to use lib/CodeGen
- This simplifies the code and avoids methods ending up in the wrong
interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489
llvm-svn: 315633
Add profitability checks for modifying counted loops to use the mtctr instruction.
The latency of mtctr is only justified if there are more than 4 comparisons that
will be removed as a result. Usually counted loops are formed relatively early
and before unrolling, so most low trip count loops often don't survive. However
we want to ensure that if they do, we do not mistakenly update them to mtctr loops.
Use CodeMetrics to ensure we are only doing this for small loops with small trip counts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38212
llvm-svn: 315592
Summary:
Add LLVM_FORCE_ENABLE_DUMP cmake option, and use it along with
LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS to set LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP.
Remove NDEBUG and only use LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP to enable dump methods.
Move definition of LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP from config.h to llvm-config.h so
it'll be picked up by public headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38406
llvm-svn: 315590
Currently we produce a bunch of unnecessary code when emitting the
prologue/epilogue for spills/restores. Namely, if the load from stack
slot/store to stack slot instruction is an X-Form instruction, we will
always produce an LIS/ORI sequence for the stack offset.
Furthermore, we have not exploited the P9 vector D-Form loads/stores for this
purpose.
This patch address both issues.
Specifying the D-Form load as the instruction to use for stack spills/reloads
should be safe because:
1. The stack should be aligned according to the ABI
2. If the stack isn't aligned, PPCRegisterInfo::eliminateFrameIndex() will
check for the offset being a multiple of 16 and will convert it to an
X-Form instruction if it isn't.
Differential Revision : https://reviews.llvm.org/D38758
llvm-svn: 315500
This adds debug tracing to the table-generated assembly instruction matcher,
enabled by the -debug-only=asm-matcher option.
The changes in the target AsmParsers are to add an MCInstrInfo reference under
a consistent name, so that we can use it from table-generated code. This was
already being used this way for targets that use deprecation warnings, but 5
targets did not have it, and Hexagon had it under a different name to the other
backends.
llvm-svn: 315445
functions.
This makes the ownership of the resulting MCObjectWriter clear, and allows us
to remove one instance of MCObjectStreamer's bizarre "holding ownership via
someone else's reference" trick.
llvm-svn: 315327
A number of record form instructions were missing from the P9 scheduling
model. Added those instructions and marked the P9 model as complete.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38560
llvm-svn: 315313
The issue is that we assume operand zero of the input to the add instruction
is a register. In this case, the input comes from inline assembly and
operand zero is not a register thereby causing a crash.
The code will bail anyway if the input instruction doesn't have the right
opcode. So do that check first and let short-circuiting prevent the crash.
llvm-svn: 315285
ELFObjectWriter's constructor.
Fixes the same ownership issue for ELF that r315245 did for MachO:
ELFObjectWriter takes ownership of its MCELFObjectTargetWriter, so we want to
pass this through to the constructor via a unique_ptr, rather than a raw ptr.
llvm-svn: 315254
to MCObjectWriter's constructor.
MCObjectWriter takes ownership of its MCMachObjectTargetWriter argument -- this
patch plumbs that ownership relationship through the constructor (which
previously took raw MCMachObjectTargetWriter*) and the createMachObjectWriter
function.
llvm-svn: 315245
This patch add a support of ISD::ZERO_EXTEND in PPCDAGToDAGISel::tryBitPermutation to increase the opportunity to use rotate-and-mask by reordering ZEXT and ANDI.
Since tryBitPermutation stops analyzing nodes if it hits a ZEXT node while traversing SDNodes, we want to avoid ZEXT between two nodes that can be folded into a rotate-and-mask instruction.
For example, we allow these nodes
t9: i32 = add t7, Constant:i32<1>
t11: i32 = and t9, Constant:i32<255>
t12: i64 = zero_extend t11
t14: i64 = shl t12, Constant:i64<2>
to be folded into a rotate-and-mask instruction.
Such case often happens in array accesses with logical AND operation in the index, e.g. array[i & 0xFF];
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37514
llvm-svn: 314655
This is a follow-on of D37211.
D37211 eliminates a compare instruction if two conditional branches can be made based on the one compare instruction, e.g.
if (a == 0) { ... }
else if (a < 0) { ... }
This patch extends this optimization to support partially redundant cases, which often happen in while loops.
For example, one compare instruction is moved from the loop body into the preheader by this optimization in the following example.
do {
if (a == 0) dummy1();
a = func(a);
} while (a > 0);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38236
llvm-svn: 314390
This patch makes analyzeBranch eliminate unconditional branch to the next instruction.
After basic blocks are re-organized by optimizers, such as machine block placement, a BB may end with an unconditional branch to the next (fallthrough) BB. This patch removes such redundant branch instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37730
llvm-svn: 314297
In the past while, I've committed a number of patches in the PowerPC back end
aimed at eliminating comparison instructions. However, this causes some failures
in proprietary source and these issues are not observed in SPEC or any open
source packages I've been able to run.
As a result, I'm pulling the entire series and will refactor it to:
- Have a single entry point for easy control
- Have fine-grained control over which patterns we transform
A side-effect of this is that test cases for these patches (and modified by
them) are XFAIL-ed. This is a temporary measure as it is counter-productive
to remove/modify these test cases and then have to modify them again when
the refactored patch is recommitted.
The failure will be investigated in parallel to the refactoring effort and
the recommit will either have a fix for it or will leave this transformation
off by default until the problem is resolved.
llvm-svn: 314244
As mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D33718, this simply adds another
pattern to the compare elimination sequence and is committed without a
differential review.
llvm-svn: 314106
Summary:
Right now there are two functions with the same name, one does the work
and the other one returns true if expansion is needed. Rename
TargetTransformInfo::expandMemCmp to make it more consistent with other
members of TargetTransformInfo.
Remove the unused Instruction* parameter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38165
llvm-svn: 314096
As mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D33718, this simply adds another
pattern to the compare elimination sequence and is committed without a
differential review.
llvm-svn: 314073
As mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D33718, this simply adds another
pattern to the compare elimination sequence and is committed without a
differential revision.
llvm-svn: 314062
As mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D33718, this simply adds another
pattern to the compare elimination sequence and is committed without a
differential revision.
llvm-svn: 314060
As mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D33718, this simply adds another
pattern to the compare elimination sequence and is committed without a
differential revision.
llvm-svn: 314055
This patch just adds the missing information to the P9 scheduling model to allow
the model to be marked as complete.
The model has been verified against P9 documentation. The model was verified
with utils/schedcover.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35695
llvm-svn: 314026
Summary: Conditional returns were not taken into consideration at all. Implement them by turning them into jumps and normal returns. This means there is a slightly higher performance penalty for conditional returns, but this is the best we can do, and it still disturbs little of the rest.
Reviewers: dberris, echristo
Subscribers: sanjoy, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38102
llvm-svn: 314005
This patch re-commits the patch that was pulled out due to a
problem it caused, but with a fix for the problem. The fix
was reviewed separately by Eric Christopher and Hal Finkel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38054
llvm-svn: 313978
This patch updates register allocation to enable spilling gprs to
volatile vector registers rather than the stack. It can be enabled
for Power9 with option -ppc-enable-gpr-to-vsr-spills.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34815
llvm-svn: 313886
Two blocks prior to the join each perform an li and the the join block has an
add using the initialized register. Optimize each predecessor block to instead
use addi and delete the li's and add.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36734
llvm-svn: 313639
Implementing this pass as a PowerPC specific pass. Branch coalescing utilizes
the analyzeBranch method which currently does not include any implicit operands.
This is not an issue on PPC but must be handled on other targets.
Pass is currently off by default. Enabled via -enable-ppc-branch-coalesce.
Differential Revision : https: // reviews.llvm.org/D32776
llvm-svn: 313061
The lxv/stxv instructions require an offset that is 0 % 16. Previously we were
selecting lxv/stxv for loads and stores to the stack where the offset from the
slot was a multiple of 16, but the stack slot was not 16 or more byte aligned.
When the frame gets lowered these transform to r(1|31) + slot + offset.
If slot is not aligned, slot + offset may not be 0 % 16.
Now we require 16 byte or more alignment for select lxv/stxv to stack slots.
Includes a testcase that shows both sufficiently and insufficiently aligned
stack slots.
llvm-svn: 312843
Summary:
This fixes code-gen for XRay in PPC. The regression wasn't caught by
codegen tests which we add in this change.
What happened was the following:
- For tail exits, we used to unconditionally prepend the returns/exits
with a pseudo-instruction that gets lowered to the instrumentation
sled (and leave the actual return/exit instruction as-is).
- Changes to the XRay instrumentation pass caused the tail exits to
suddenly also emit the tail exit pseudo-instruction, since the check
for whether a return instruction was also a call instruction meant it
was a tail exit instruction.
- None of the tests caught the regression either due to non-existent
tests, or the tests being disabled/removed for continuous breakage.
This change re-introduces some of the basic tests and verifies that
we're back to a state that allows the back-end to generate appropriate
XRay instrumented binaries for PPC in the presence of tail exits.
Reviewers: echristo, timshen
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37570
llvm-svn: 312772
If multiple conditional branches are executed based on the same comparison, we can execute multiple conditional branches based on the result of one comparison on PPC. For example,
if (a == 0) { ... }
else if (a < 0) { ... }
can be executed by one compare and two conditional branches instead of two pairs of a compare and a conditional branch.
This patch identifies a code sequence of the two pairs of a compare and a conditional branch and merge the compares if possible.
To maximize the opportunity, we do canonicalization of code sequence before merging compares.
For the above example, the input for this pass looks like:
cmplwi r3, 0
beq 0, .LBB0_3
cmpwi r3, -1
bgt 0, .LBB0_4
So, before merging two compares, we canonicalize it as
cmpwi r3, 0 ; cmplwi and cmpwi yield same result for beq
beq 0, .LBB0_3
cmpwi r3, 0 ; greather than -1 means greater or equal to 0
bge 0, .LBB0_4
The generated code should be
cmpwi r3, 0
beq 0, .LBB0_3
bge 0, .LBB0_4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37211
llvm-svn: 312514
This goes back to a discussion about IR canonicalization. We'd like to preserve and convert
more IR to 'select' than we currently do because that's likely the best choice in IR:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-September/105335.html
...but that's often not true for codegen, so we need to account for this pattern coming in
to the backend and transform it to better DAG ops.
Steps in this patch:
1. Add an EVT param to the existing convertSelectOfConstantsToMath() TLI hook to more finely
enable this transform. Other targets will probably want that anyway to distinguish scalars
from vectors. We're using that here to exclude AVX512 targets, but it may not be necessary.
2. Convert a vselect to ext+add. This eliminates a constant load/materialization, and the
vector ext is often free.
Implementing a more general fold using xor+and can be a follow-up for targets that don't have
a legal vselect. It's also possible that we can remove the TLI hook for the special case fold
implemented here because we're eliminating a constant, but it needs to be tested on other
targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36840
llvm-svn: 311731
Implementing this pass as a PowerPC specific pass. Branch coalescing utilizes
the analyzeBranch method which currently does not include any implicit operands.
This is not an issue on PPC but must be handled on other targets.
Differential Revision : https: // reviews.llvm.org/D32776
llvm-svn: 311588
- recommitting after fixing a test failure on MacOS
On PPC64, OR (XOR) with a 32-bit immediate can be done with only two instructions, i.e. ori + oris.
But the current LLVM generates three or four instructions for this purpose (and also it clobbers one GPR).
This patch makes PPC backend generate ori + oris (xori + xoris) for OR (XOR) with a 32-bit immediate.
e.g. (x | 0xFFFFFFFF) should be
ori 3, 3, 65535
oris 3, 3, 65535
but LLVM generates without this patch
li 4, 0
oris 4, 4, 65535
ori 4, 4, 65535
or 3, 3, 4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34757
llvm-svn: 311538
On PPC64, OR (XOR) with a 32-bit immediate can be done with only two instructions, i.e. ori + oris.
But the current LLVM generates three or four instructions for this purpose (and also it clobbers one GPR).
This patch makes PPC backend generate ori + oris (xori + xoris) for OR (XOR) with a 32-bit immediate.
e.g. (x | 0xFFFFFFFF) should be
ori 3, 3, 65535
oris 3, 3, 65535
but LLVM generates without this patch
li 4, 0
oris 4, 4, 65535
ori 4, 4, 65535
or 3, 3, 4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34757
llvm-svn: 311526
For the medium and large code models we only need to check if a call crosses
dso-boundaries when considering tail-call elgibility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34245
llvm-svn: 311353
Preparations to use the per-increment are sometimes done in the target
independent pass Loop Strength Reduction. We try to detect them in the PowerPC
specific pass so that they are not done twice and so that we do not add PHIs
that are not required.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36736
llvm-svn: 311332
Add codegen for VSX word extract conversion from signed/unsigned to single/double
precision.
For UINT_TO_FP:
Extract word unsigned and convert to float was implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D20239.
Here we will add the missing extract integer and conversion to double. This
utilizes the new P9 instruction xxextractuw to extracting an integer element
when the result will be converted to double thereby saving 2 direct moves
(VSR <-> GPR).
For SINT_TO_FP:
We will implement the following sequence which will also reduce the number of
instructions by saving 2 direct moves.
v4i32->f32:
xxspltw
xvcvsxwsp
xscvspdpn
v4i32->f64:
xxspltw
xvcvsxwdp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35859
llvm-svn: 310866
introduce a miscompile bug.
There appears to be a bug where the generated code to extract the sign
bit doesn't work correctly for 32-bit inputs. I've replied to the
original commit pointing out the problem. I think I see by inspection
(and reading the manual for PPC) how to fix this, but I can't be 100%
confident and I also don't know what the best way to test this is.
Currently it seems nearly impossible to get the backend to hit this code
path, but the patch autohr is likely in a better position to craft such
test cases than I am, and based on where the bug is it should be easily
done.
Original commit message for r310346:
"""
[PowerPC] Eliminate compares - add i32 sext/zext handling for SETLE/SETGE
Adds handling for SETLE/SETGE comparisons on i32 values. Furthermore, it
adds the handling for the special case where RHS == 0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34048
"""
llvm-svn: 310809
The liveness-tracking code assumes that the registers that were saved
in the function's prolog are live outside of the function. Specifically,
that registers that were saved are also live-on-exit from the function.
This isn't always the case as illustrated by the LR register on ARM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36160
llvm-svn: 310619
We've implemented a 1-byte splat using XXSPLTISB on P9. However, LLVM will
produce a 1-byte splat even for wider element BUILD_VECTOR nodes. This patch
prevents crashing in that situation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35650
llvm-svn: 310358
Adds handling for SETLE/SETGE comparisons on i32 values. Furthermore, it adds
the handling for the special case where RHS == 0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34048
llvm-svn: 310346
Francis Visoiu Mistrih