If there is more than one TypoExpr within the expr being transformed and
any but the last TypoExpr seen don't have any viable candidates, the
tree transform will be aborted early and the remaining TypoExprs are
never seen and hence never diagnosed. This adds a simple
RecursiveASTVisitor to find all of the TypoExprs to be diagnosed in the
case where typo correction of the entire expr fails (and the result of
the tree transform is an ExprError).
llvm-svn: 222465
The default handling is extended to properly create member expressions
and Objective-C ivar references.
Also detect and reject cases where multiple corrections have identical
correction distances and are valid, instead of suggesting the first one
that is found.
llvm-svn: 222462
Summary:
Ok, here is somewhat addition to D6217 aiming to preserve old darwin behavior wrt the typedefed types. The actual change to SemaChecking turned out to be pretty gross, in particular:
1. We need to extract the typedef'ed type for proper diagnostics
2. We need to walk over paren expressions as well
Reviewers: chandlerc, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6256
llvm-svn: 222044
Summary:
Consider the following nifty 1 liner: (0 ? csqrtl(2.0f) : sqrtl(2.0f)). One can easily obtain such code from e.g. tgmath. Right now it produces an assertion because we fail to do the promotion real => _Complex real.
The case was properly handled previously (old handleOtherComplexFloatConversion routine), but was forgotten in the current version. This seems to be about fallout from r219557
Reviewers: chandlerc, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6217
llvm-svn: 221821
One takes an Expr* and the other is a simple wrapper that takes an
ExprResult instead, and handles checking whether the ExprResult is
invalid.
Additionally, allow an optional callback that is run on the full result
of the tree transform, for filtering potential corrections based on the
characteristics of the resulting expression once all of the typos have
been replaced.
llvm-svn: 221735
This includes adding the new TypoExpr-based lazy typo correction to
LookupMemberExprInRecord as an alternative to the existing eager typo
correction.
llvm-svn: 220698
Part of the infrastructure is a map from a TypoExpr to the Sema-specific
state needed to correct it, along with helpers to ease dealing with the
state.
The the typo count is propagated up the stack of
ExpressionEvaluationContextRecords when one is popped off of to
avoid accidentally dropping TypoExprs on the floor. For example,
the attempted correction of g() in test/CXX/class/class.mem/p5-0x.cpp
happens with an ExpressionEvaluationContextRecord that is popped off
the stack prior to ActOnFinishFullExpr being called and the tree
transform for TypoExprs being run.
llvm-svn: 220695
We build a NestedNameSpecifier that records the CXXRecordDecl in which
__super appeared. Name lookup is performed in all base classes of the
recorded CXXRecordDecl. Use of __super is allowed only inside class and
member function scope.
llvm-svn: 218484
Changes diagnostic options, language standard options, diagnostic identifiers, diagnostic wording to use c++14 instead of c++1y. It also modifies related test cases to use the updated diagnostic wording.
llvm-svn: 215982
Previously, assigning an inheritance model to a derived class would
trigger further assiginments to the various bases of the class. This
was done to fix a bug where we couldn't handle an implicit
base-to-derived conversion for pointers-to-members when the conversion
was ambiguous at an earlier point.
However, this is not how the MS scheme works. Instead, assign
inheritance models to *just* the class which owns to declaration we
ended up referencing.
N.B. This result is surprising in many ways. It means that it is
possible for a base to have a "larger" inheritance model than it's
derived classes. It also means that bases in the conversion path do not
get assigned a model.
struct A { void f(); void f(int); };
struct B : A {};
struct C : B {};
void f() { void (C::*x)() = &A::f; }
We can only begin to assign an inheritance model *after* we've seen the
address-of but *before* we've done the implicit conversion the more
derived pointer-to-member type. After that point, both 'A' and 'C' will
have an inheritance model but 'B' will not. Surprising, right?
llvm-svn: 215174
FunctionProtoType::ExtProtoInfo. Most of the users of these fields don't care
about the other ExtProtoInfo bits and just want to talk about the exception
specification.
llvm-svn: 214450
it through the normal TreeTransform logic for Exprs (which will strip off
implicit parts of the initialization and never re-create them).
llvm-svn: 213913
-- a constructor list initialization that unpacked an initializer list into
constructor arguments and
-- a list initialization that created as std::initializer_list and passed it
as the first argument to a constructor
in the AST. Use this flag while instantiating templates to provide the right
semantics for the resulting initialization.
llvm-svn: 213224
This patch implements semantic analysis to make sure that the loop is in OpenMP canonical form.
This is the form required for 'omp simd', 'omp for' and other loop pragmas.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3778
llvm-svn: 210095
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19876
The following C++1y code results in a crash:
struct X {
int m = 10;
int n = [this](auto) { return m; }(20);
};
When implicitly instantiating the generic lambda's call operator specialization body, Sema is unable to determine the current 'this' type when transforming the MemberExpr 'm' - since it looks for the nearest enclosing FunctionDeclDC - which is obviously null.
I considered two ways to fix this:
1) In InstantiateFunctionDefinition, when the context is saved after the lambda scope info is created, retain the 'this' pointer.
2) Teach getCurrentThisType() to recognize it is within a generic lambda within an NSDMI/default-initializer and return the appropriate this type.
I chose to implement #2 (though I confess I do not have a compelling reason for choosing it over #1).
Richard Smith accepted the patch:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3935
Thank you!
llvm-svn: 209874
Summary:
Naming the destructor using a typedef-name for the class-name is
well-formed.
This fixes PR19620.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3583
llvm-svn: 209319
caused us to perform copy-initialization for the parameters of an allocation
function called by a new-expression multiple times, resulting in us rejecting
allocations that passed non-copyable parameters (and much worse things in
MSVC compat mode, where we potentially called this function multiple times).
llvm-svn: 208724
We accept 'void *p; p->~void();' for MSVC compatibility since r148682.
However, we were returning ExprError, rather than producing an AST,
despite only diagnosing it with a warning. CodeGen noticed that the
template function specialization had an invalid AST, and therefore
didn't generate code for it. This change makes us produce an AST with a
void pseudo-dtor call.
Part of PR18256.
llvm-svn: 207771
temporary in a decltype expression only applies if that temporary was created
by a function call, not by a function-style cast or other flavour of
expression.
llvm-svn: 201542
type-dependent variable, even if the initializer isn't value-dependent. This
happens for ParenListExprs composed of non-value-dependent subexpressions, for
instance.
We should really give ParenListExprs (and InitListExprs) the type of the
initialized entity if they're used to represent a dependent initialization (and
if so, set them to be type-, value- and instantiation-dependent).
llvm-svn: 200954
redeclaration, not just when looking them up for a use -- we need the implicit
declaration to appropriately check various properties of them (notably, whether
they're deleted).
llvm-svn: 200729
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
llvm-svn: 200082
Fix a perennial source of confusion in the clang type system: Declarations and
function prototypes have parameters to which arguments are supplied, so calling
these 'arguments' was a stretch even in C mode, let alone C++ where default
arguments, templates and overloading make the distinction important to get
right.
Readability win across the board, especially in the casting, ADL and
overloading implementations which make a lot more sense at a glance now.
Will keep an eye on the builders and update dependent projects shortly.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 199686
Implement type trait primitives used in the latest edition of the Microsoft
standard C++ library type_traits header.
With this change we can parse much of the Visual Studio 2013 standard headers,
particularly anything that includes <type_traits>.
Fully implemented, available in all language modes:
* __is_constructible()
* __is_nothrow_constructible()
* __is_nothrow_assignable()
Partially implemented, semantic analysis WIP, available as MS extensions:
* __is_destructible()
* __is_nothrow_destructible()
llvm-svn: 199619
Check all default ctors, not just the first one we see. This brings
__has_nothrow_constructor() in line with the other unary type traits.
A C++ class can have multiple default constructors but clang was only checking
the first one written, presumably due to ambiguity in the GNU specification.
MSVC has the same bug, while g++ has the correct implementation which we now
match.
llvm-svn: 199618
String literal to char* conversion is deprecated in C++03, and is removed in
C++11. We still accept this conversion in C++11 mode as an extension, if we find
it in the best viable function.
llvm-svn: 199513
Additionally, remove the optional nature of the spelling list index when creating attributes. This is supported by table generating a Spelling enumeration when the spellings for an attribute are distinct enough to warrant it.
llvm-svn: 199378
There's been long-standing confusion over the role of these two options. This
commit makes the necessary changes to differentiate them clearly, following up
from r198936.
MicrosoftExt (aka. fms-extensions):
Enable largely unobjectionable Microsoft language extensions to ease
portability. This mode, also supported by gcc, is used for building software
like FreeBSD and Linux kernel extensions that share code with Windows drivers.
MSVCCompat (aka. -fms-compatibility, formerly MicrosoftMode):
Turn on a special mode supporting 'heinous' extensions for drop-in
compatibility with the Microsoft Visual C++ product. Standards-compilant C and
C++ code isn't guaranteed to work in this mode. Implies MicrosoftExt.
Note that full -fms-compatibility mode is currently enabled by default on the
Windows target, which may need tuning to serve as a reasonable default.
See cfe-commits for the full discourse, thread 'r198497 - Move MS predefined
type_info out of InitializePredefinedMacros'
No change in behaviour.
llvm-svn: 199209
Remove UnaryTypeTraitExpr and switch all remaining type trait related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
The UTT/BTT/TT enum prefix and evaluation code is retained pending further
cleanup.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits following the removal of
BinaryTypeTraitExpr in r197273.
llvm-svn: 198271
Even g++ considers this a valid C++ identifier and it should only have been
visible in C mode.
Also drop the associated low-value diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 197995
There's nothing special about type traits accepting two arguments.
This commit eliminates BinaryTypeTraitExpr and switches all related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
Also fixes a CodeGen failure with variadic type traits appearing in a
non-constant expression.
The BTT/TT prefix and evaluation code is retained as-is for now but will soon
be further cleaned up.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits.
llvm-svn: 197273
Type trait parsing is all over the place at the moment with unary, binary and
n-ary C++11 type traits that were developed independently at different points
in clang's history.
There's no good reason to handle them separately -- there are three parsers,
three AST nodes and lots of duplicated handling code with slightly different
implementations and diags for each kind.
This commit unifies parsing of type traits and sets the stage for further
consolidation.
No change in behaviour other than more consistent error recovery.
llvm-svn: 197179
Employed the following refactorings:
- Renamed some functions
- Introduced explaining variables
- Cleaned up & added comments
- Used Optional<unsigned> for return value instead of an out parameter
- Added assertions
- Constified a few member functions
No functionality change.
All regressions pass.
llvm-svn: 196662
__builtin_types_compatible_p() isn't a C++ type trait at all, rather a GNU C
special-case, so it's fine to use BoolTy the default return type for binary
type traits.
This brings BTT in line with other arities that already default to BoolTy.
Cleanup only, no change in behaviour.
llvm-svn: 196646
For an init capture, process the initialization expression
right away. For lambda init-captures such as the following:
const int x = 10;
auto L = [i = x+1](int a) {
return [j = x+2,
&k = x](char b) { };
};
keep in mind that each lambda init-capture has to have:
- its initialization expression executed in the context
of the enclosing/parent decl-context.
- but the variable itself has to be 'injected' into the
decl-context of its lambda's call-operator (which has
not yet been created).
Each init-expression is a full-expression that has to get
Sema-analyzed (for capturing etc.) before its lambda's
call-operator's decl-context, scope & scopeinfo are pushed on their
respective stacks. Thus if any variable is odr-used in the init-capture
it will correctly get captured in the enclosing lambda, if one exists.
The init-variables above are created later once the lambdascope and
call-operators decl-context is pushed onto its respective stack.
Since the lambda init-capture's initializer expression occurs in the
context of the enclosing function or lambda, therefore we can not wait
till a lambda scope has been pushed on before deciding whether the
variable needs to be captured. We also need to process all
lvalue-to-rvalue conversions and discarded-value conversions,
so that we can avoid capturing certain constant variables.
For e.g.,
void test() {
const int x = 10;
auto L = [&z = x](char a) { <-- don't capture by the current lambda
return [y = x](int i) { <-- don't capture by enclosing lambda
return y;
}
};
If x was not const, the second use would require 'L' to capture, and
that would be an error.
Make sure TranformLambdaExpr is also aware of this.
Patch approved by Richard (Thanks!!)
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2092
llvm-svn: 196454
nested-name-specifier, rather than crashing. (In fact, reject all
literal-operator-ids that have a non-namespace nested-name-specifier). The
grammar doesn't allow these in some cases, and in other cases does allow them
but instantiation will always fail.
llvm-svn: 196443
See http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2013-November/033369.html for discussion on cfe-dev.
This fix explicitly checks whether we are within the declcontext of a lambda's call operator - which is what I had intended to be true (and assumed would be true if getCurLambda returns a valid pointer) before checking whether a lambda can capture the potential-captures of the innermost lambda.
A deeper fix (that addresses why getCurLambda() returns a valid pointer when perhaps it shouldn't?) - as proposed by Richard Smith in http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17877 - has been suggested as a FIXME.
Patch was LGTM'd by Richard (just barely :)
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2144
llvm-svn: 194448
Both Richard and I felt that the current wording in the working paper needed some tweaking - Please see http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2035 for additional context and references to core-reflector messages that discuss wording tweaks.
What is implemented is what we had intended to specify in Bristol; but, recently felt that the specification might benefit from some tweaking and fleshing.
As a rough attempt to explain the semantics: If a nested lambda with a default-capture names a variable within its body, and if the enclosing full expression that contains the name of that variable is instantiation-dependent - then an enclosing lambda that is capture-ready (i.e. within a non-dependent context) must capture that variable, if all intervening nested lambdas can potentially capture that variable if they need to, and all intervening parent lambdas of the capture-ready lambda can and do capture the variable.
Of note, 'this' capturing is also currently underspecified in the working paper for generic lambdas. What is implemented here is if the set of candidate functions in a nested generic lambda includes both static and non-static member functions (regardless of viability checking - i.e. num and type of parameters/arguments) - and if all intervening nested-inner lambdas between the capture-ready lambda and the function-call containing nested lambda can capture 'this' and if all enclosing lambdas of the capture-ready lambda can capture 'this', then 'this' is speculatively captured by that capture-ready lambda.
Hopefully a paper for the C++ committee (that Richard and I had started some preliminary work on) is forthcoming.
This essentially makes generic lambdas feature complete, except for known bugs. The more prominent ones (and the ones I am currently aware of) being:
- generic lambdas and init-captures are broken - but a patch that fixes this is already in the works ...
- nested variadic expansions such as:
auto K = [](auto ... OuterArgs) {
vp([=](auto ... Is) {
decltype(OuterArgs) OA = OuterArgs;
return 0;
}(5)...);
return 0;
};
auto M = K('a', ' ', 1, " -- ", 3.14);
currently cause crashes. I think I know how to fix this (since I had done so in my initial implementation) - but it will probably take some work and back & forth with Doug and Richard.
A warm thanks to all who provided feedback - and especially to Doug Gregor and Richard Smith for their pivotal guidance: their insight and prestidigitation in such matters is boundless!
Now let's hope this commit doesn't upset the buildbot gods ;)
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 194188
would be deleted are still declared, but are ignored by overload resolution.
Also, don't delete such members if a subobject has no corresponding move
operation and a non-trivial copy. This causes us to implicitly declare move
operations in more cases, but risks move-assigning virtual bases multiple
times in some circumstances (a warning for that is to follow).
llvm-svn: 193969
Summary: Some MS headers use these features.
Reviewers: rnk, rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1948
llvm-svn: 192936
This is a fix to PR12778: in erroneous code an allocation function
can be declared with no arguments, quering the first argument in this case
causes assertion violation.
llvm-svn: 190751
Summary:
__uuidof on templated types should exmaine if any of its template
parameters have a uuid declspec. If exactly one does, then take it.
Otherwise, issue an appropriate error.
Reviewers: rsmith, thakis, rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1419
llvm-svn: 190240
In addition to storing more useful information in the AST, this
fixes a semantic check in template instantiation which checks whether
the l-paren location is valid.
Fixes PR16903.
llvm-svn: 188495
global allocation or deallocation function, that should not cause that global
allocation or deallocation function to become unavailable.
llvm-svn: 186270
clang would incorrectly not allow the following:
int x = true ? (throw 1) : 2;
The problem exists because we don't see beyond the parens.
This, in turn, causes us to believe that we are choosing between void
and int which we diagnose as an error.
Instead, allow clang to see the 'throw' inside the parens.
llvm-svn: 183085
* Treat _Atomic(T) as a literal type if T is a literal type.
* Evaluate expressions of this type properly.
* Fix a lurking bug where we built completely bogus ASTs for converting to
_Atomic types in C++ in some cases, caught by the tests for this change.
llvm-svn: 182541
Kaelyn Takata