This reverts commit ed29dbaafa.
I'm backing out D68945, which as the discussion for D73526 shows, doesn't
seem to handle the -O0 path through the codegen backend correctly. I'll
reland the patch when a fix is worked out, apologies for all the churn.
The two parent commits are part of this revert too.
Conflicts:
llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dbg-addr-dse.ll
SelectionDAGBuilder conflict is due to a nearby change in e39e2b4a79
that's technically unrelated. dbg-addr-dse.ll conflicted because
41206b61e3 (legitimately) changes the order of two lines.
There are further modifications to dbg-value-func-arg.ll: it landed after
the patch being reverted, and I've converted indirection to be represented
by the isIndirect field rather than DW_OP_deref.
This patch reverts part of r362750 / D62650, which stopped
LiveDebugVariables from trimming leading variable location ranges down
to only covering those instructions that are in scope. I've observed some
circumstances where the number of DBG_VALUEs in a function can be
amplified in an un-necessary way, to cover more instructions that are
out of scope, leading to very slow compile times. Trimming the range
of instructions that the variables cover solves the slow compile times.
The specific problem that r362750 tries to fix is addressed by the
assignment to RStart that I've added. Any variable location that begins
at the first instruction of a block will now be considered to begin at the
start of the block. While these sound the same, the have different
SlotIndexes, and the register allocator may shoehorn additional
instructions in between the two. The test added in the past
(wrong_debug_loc_after_regalloc.ll) still works with this modification.
live-debug-variables.ll has a range trimmed to not cover the prologue of
the function, while dbg-addr-dse.ll has a DBG_VALUE sink past one
instruction with no DebugLoc, which is expected behaviour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73691
This patch kills off a significant user of the "IsIndirect" field of
DBG_VALUE machine insts. Brought up in in PR41675, IsIndirect is
techncally redundant as it can be expressed by the DIExpression of a
DBG_VALUE inst, and it isn't helpful to have two ways of expressing
things.
Rather than setting IsIndirect, have DBG_VALUE creators add an extra deref
to the insts DIExpression. There should now be no appearences of
IsIndirect=True from isel down to LiveDebugVariables / VirtRegRewriter,
which is ensured by an assertion in LDVImpl::handleDebugValue. This means
we also get to delete the IsIndirect handling in LiveDebugVariables. Tests
can be upgraded by for example swapping the following IsIndirect=True
DBG_VALUE:
DBG_VALUE $somereg, 0, !123, !DIExpression(DW_OP_foo)
With one where the indirection is in the DIExpression, by _appending_
a deref:
DBG_VALUE $somereg, $noreg, !123, !DIExpression(DW_OP_foo, DW_OP_deref)
Which both mean the same thing.
Most of the test changes in this patch are updates of that form; also some
changes in how the textual assembly printer handles these insts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68945
llvm-svn: 374877
Incorrect Debug Variable Range was calculated while "COMPUTING LIVE DEBUG VARIABLES" stage.
Range for Debug Variable("i") computed according to current state of instructions
inside of basic block. But Register Allocator creates new instructions which were not taken
into account when Live Debug Variables computed. In the result DBG_VALUE instruction for
the "i" variable was put after these newly inserted instructions. This is incorrect.
Debug Value for the loop counter should be inserted before any loop instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62650
llvm-svn: 362750
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is
!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)
We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is
llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)
It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.
We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331841
Discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html
In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.
llvm-svn: 323922
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always print registers as lowercase.
* Only debug printing is affected. It now follows MIR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40417
llvm-svn: 319187
Summary:
This should fix a regression introduced by r313786, which switched from
MachineInstr::isIndirectDebugValue() to checking if operand 1 is an
immediate. I didn't have a test case for it until now.
A single UserValue, which approximates a user variable, may have many
DBG_VALUE instructions that disagree about whether the variable is in
memory or in a virtual register. This will become much more common once
we have llvm.dbg.addr, but you can construct such a test case manually
today with llvm.dbg.value.
Before this change, we would get two UserValues: one for direct and one
for indirect DBG_VALUE instructions describing the same variable. If we
build separate interval maps for direct and indirect locations, we will
end up accidentally coalescing identical DBG_VALUE intervals that need
to remain separate because they are broken up by intervals of the
opposite direct-ness.
Reviewers: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37932
llvm-svn: 314819
The fix is to avoid invalidating our insertion point in
replaceDbgDeclare:
Builder.insertDeclare(NewAddress, DIVar, DIExpr, Loc, InsertBefore);
+ if (DII == InsertBefore)
+ InsertBefore = &*std::next(InsertBefore->getIterator());
DII->eraseFromParent();
I had to write a unit tests for this instead of a lit test because the
use list order matters in order to trigger the bug.
The reduced C test case for this was:
void useit(int*);
static inline void inlineme() {
int x[2];
useit(x);
}
void f() {
inlineme();
inlineme();
}
llvm-svn: 313905
.. as well as the two subsequent changes r313826 and r313875.
This leads to segfaults in combination with ASAN. Will forward repro
instructions to the original author (rnk).
llvm-svn: 313876
Summary:
This implements the design discussed on llvm-dev for better tracking of
variables that live in memory through optimizations:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-September/117222.html
This is tracked as PR34136
llvm.dbg.addr is intended to be produced and used in almost precisely
the same way as llvm.dbg.declare is today, with the exception that it is
control-dependent. That means that dbg.addr should always have a
position in the instruction stream, and it will allow passes that
optimize memory operations on local variables to insert llvm.dbg.value
calls to reflect deleted stores. See SourceLevelDebugging.rst for more
details.
The main drawback to generating DBG_VALUE machine instrs is that they
usually cause LLVM to emit a location list for DW_AT_location. The next
step will be to teach DwarfDebug.cpp how to recognize more DBG_VALUE
ranges as not needing a location list, and possibly start setting
DW_AT_start_offset for variables whose lifetimes begin mid-scope.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, probinson
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37768
llvm-svn: 313825
Jeremy Morse