Summary:
RISC-V uses a post-select peephole pass to optimise
`(load/store (ADDI $reg, %lo(addr)), 0)` into `(load/store $reg, %lo(addr))`.
This peephole wasn't firing for accesses to constant pools, which is how we
materialise most floating point constants.
This adds support for the constantpool case, which improves code generation for
lots of small FP loading examples. I have not added any tests because this
structure is well-covered by the `fp-imm.ll` testcases, as well as almost
all other uses of floating point constants in the RISC-V backend tests.
Reviewed By: luismarques, asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79523
Summary:
RISC-V uses a post-select peephole pass to optimise
`(load/store (ADDI $reg, %lo(addr)), 0)` into `(load/store $reg, %lo(addr))`.
This peephole wasn't firing for accesses to constant pools, which is how we
materialise most floating point constants.
This adds support for the constantpool case, which improves code generation for
lots of small FP loading examples. I have not added any tests because this
structure is well-covered by the `fp-imm.ll` testcases, as well as almost
all other uses of floating point constants in the RISC-V backend tests.
Reviewed By: luismarques, asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79523
Most of the test changes are trivial instruction reorderings and differing
register allocations, without any obvious performance impact.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66973
llvm-svn: 372106
Recent change rL357393 uses MachineInstrBuilder::addDisp to add a based on a
BlockAddress but this case was not implemented.
This patch adds the missing case and a test for RISC-V that exercises the new
case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60136
llvm-svn: 357752
This patch adds an implementation of a PC-relative addressing sequence to be
used when -mcmodel=medium is specified. With absolute addressing, a 'medium'
codemodel may cause addresses to be out of range. This is because while
'medium' implies a 2 GiB addressing range, this 2 GiB can be at any offset as
opposed to 'small', which implies the first 2 GiB only.
Note that LLVM/Clang currently specifies code models differently to GCC, where
small and medium imply the same functionality as GCC's medlow and medany
respectively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54143
Patch by Lewis Revill.
llvm-svn: 357393
Sam Elliott