This patch adds tests for folds of ADDIs into load/stores, focusing on
load/stores with nonzero offsets. When the offset is nonzero we currently
don't do the fold. A follow-up patch will improve on that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79689
Since i32 is not legal in riscv64,
it always promoted to i64 before emitting lib call and
for conversions like float/double to int and float/double to unsigned int
wrong lib call was emitted. This commit fix it using custom lowering.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80526
Let the codegen recognized the nomerge attribute and disable branch folding when the attribute is given
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79537
Summary:
Verify that each DBG_VALUE has a debug location. This is required by
LiveDebugValues, and perhaps by other late passes.
There's an exception for tests: lots of tests use a two-operand form of
DBG_VALUE for convenience. There's no reason to prevent that.
This is an extension of D80665, but there's no dependency.
Reviewers: aprantl, jmorse, davide, chrisjackson
Subscribers: hiraditya, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80670
Summary:
RISC-V uses a post-select peephole pass to optimise
`(load/store (ADDI $reg, %lo(addr)), 0)` into `(load/store $reg, %lo(addr))`.
This peephole wasn't firing for accesses to constant pools, which is how we
materialise most floating point constants.
This adds support for the constantpool case, which improves code generation for
lots of small FP loading examples. I have not added any tests because this
structure is well-covered by the `fp-imm.ll` testcases, as well as almost
all other uses of floating point constants in the RISC-V backend tests.
Reviewed By: luismarques, asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79523
Summary:
RISC-V uses a post-select peephole pass to optimise
`(load/store (ADDI $reg, %lo(addr)), 0)` into `(load/store $reg, %lo(addr))`.
This peephole wasn't firing for accesses to constant pools, which is how we
materialise most floating point constants.
This adds support for the constantpool case, which improves code generation for
lots of small FP loading examples. I have not added any tests because this
structure is well-covered by the `fp-imm.ll` testcases, as well as almost
all other uses of floating point constants in the RISC-V backend tests.
Reviewed By: luismarques, asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79523
This patch adds more constant materialization tests, focusing on cases where
we could improve our materialization instruction sequences (particularly for
RV64). Various of these cases will be improved upon in follow-up patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79453
Summary:
The current lowering of `select` on RISC-V uses a branch instruction to load a
register with one or other value. This is inefficient, especially in the case of
small constants that can be computed easily.
By implementing the TargetLowering::convertSelectOfConstantsToMath hook, some of
the simpler cases are covered that let us avoid introducing a branch in these
cases.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79260
Summary:
This just adds some simple cases for testing select of constants. There will be
a follow-up patch that improves code generation in some of these cases.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79259
Summary:
This patch addresses some weird assembly sequences we were seeing during
comparing floats. In particular, comparing a float to itself tells you whether
it is NaN or not, which we were doing correctly, but with an extra unneeded
`and` instruction.
This patch specialises the existing patterns to remove the `and` instructions
when both their operands are the same.
Reviewed By: luismarques, asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78908
Summary:
I worked on adding some SelectionDag patterns to address code generated by these
examples, which came out of some differential testing against GCC. The pattern
additions will be in a follow-up patch.
Reviewers: luismarques, asb
Reviewed By: luismarques, asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78907
The "Align" passed into getMachineMemOperand etc. is the alignment of
the MachinePointerInfo, not the alignment of the memory operation.
(getAlign() on a MachineMemOperand automatically reduces the alignment
to account for this.)
We were passing on wrong (overconservative) alignment in a bunch of
places. Fix a bunch of these, mostly in legalization. And while I'm
here, switch to the new Align APIs.
The test changes are all scheduling changes: the biggest effect of
preserving large alignments is that it improves alias analysis, so the
scheduler has more freedom.
(I was originally just trying to do a minor cleanup in
SelectionDAGBuilder, but I accidentally went deeper down the rabbit
hole.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77687
Summary:
Currently, the comparison argument used for ATOMIC_CMP_XCHG is legalised
with GetPromotedInteger, which leaves the upper bits of the value
undefind. Since this is used for comparing in an LR/SC loop with a
full-width comparison, we must sign extend it. We introduce a new
getExtendForAtomicCmpSwapArg to complement getExtendForAtomicOps, since
many targets have compare-and-swap instructions (or pseudos) that
correctly handle an any-extend input, and the existing function
determines the extension of the result, whereas we are concerned with
the input.
This is related to https://reviews.llvm.org/D58829, which solved the
issue for ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP_WITH_SUCCESS, but not the simpler
ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP.
Reviewers: asb, lenary, efriedma
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: arichardson, hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, jfb, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, evandro, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74453
Leverage ARM ELF build attribute section to create ELF attribute section
for RISC-V. Extract the common part of parsing logic for this section
into ELFAttributeParser.[cpp|h] and ELFAttributes.[cpp|h].
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74023
Floating point positive zero can be selected using fmv.w.x / fmv.d.x /
fcvt.d.w and the zero source register.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75729
The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier.
`.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive.
Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section`
line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail.
```
Disassembly of section .foo:
0000000000001634 .foo:
```
Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right"
Reviewed By: rupprecht
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
When running under LTO, it is common to not specify the architecture
spec, which is used for setting up the target machine, and instead rely
on features specified in each function to generate the correct
instructions.
This works for the code generator, but the RISC-V backend uses the
AsmPrinter to do instruction compression, which does not see these
features but instead uses a MCSubtargetInfo object to see whether
compression is enabled. Since this is configured based on the
TargetMachine at startup, it will result in compressed instructions not
being emitted when it has not been given the 'c' TargetFeature, but the
function has it.
This changes the RISCVAsmPrinter to re-initialize the STI feature set
based on the current MachineFunction, such that compressed instructions
are now correctly emitted regardless of the method used to enable them.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73339
Implement TargetLowering callback mayBeEmittedAsTailCall for riscv in CodeGenPrepare,
which will duplicate return instructions to enable tailcall optimization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73699
CallPreservedMask is used to describe the register liveness after a
function call. The function call in an interrupt handler should use the same
CallPreservedMask as normal functions. So that only callee save registers
can live through the function call.
This reverts commit 80a34ae311 with fixes.
Previously, since bots turning on EXPENSIVE_CHECKS are essentially turning on
MachineVerifierPass by default on X86 and the fact that
inline-asm-avx-v-constraint-32bit.ll and inline-asm-avx512vl-v-constraint-32bit.ll
are not expected to generate functioning machine code, this would go
down to `report_fatal_error` in MachineVerifierPass. Here passing
`-verify-machineinstrs=0` to make the intent explicit.
This reverts commit 80a34ae311 with fixes.
On bots llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-ubuntu and
llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian only,
llc returns 0 for these two tests unexpectedly. I tweaked the RUN line a little
bit in the hope that LIT is the culprit since this change is not in the
codepath these tests are testing.
llvm\test\CodeGen\X86\inline-asm-avx-v-constraint-32bit.ll
llvm\test\CodeGen\X86\inline-asm-avx512vl-v-constraint-32bit.ll
This reverts commit rGcd5b308b828e, rGcd5b308b828e, rG8cedf0e2994c.
There are issues to be investigated for polly bots and bots turning on
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS.
This patch adds the support required for using the __riscv_save and
__riscv_restore libcalls to implement a size-optimization for prologue
and epilogue code, whereby the spill and restore code of callee-saved
registers is implemented by common functions to reduce code duplication.
Logic is also included to ensure that if both this optimization and
shrink wrapping are enabled then the prologue and epilogue code can be
safely inserted into the basic blocks chosen by shrink wrapping.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62686
ADDI(C.ADDI) may achieve better code size than XORI, since XORI has no C extension.
This patch transforms two patterns and gets almost equivalent results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71774
When the FP exists, the FP base CFI directive offset should take the size of variable arguments into account.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73862
1. if users don't specific -mattr, the default target-feature come
from IR attribute.
2. fixed bug and re-land this patch
Reviewers: lenary, asb
Reviewed By: lenary
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70837
Summary:
This patch could be treated as a rebase of D33960. It also fixes PR35547.
A fix for `llvm/test/Other/close-stderr.ll` is proposed in D68164. Seems
the consensus is that the test is passing by chance and I'm not
sure how important it is for us. So it is removed like in D33960 for now.
The rest of the test fixes are just adding `--crash` flag to `not` tool.
** The reason it fixes PR35547 is
`exit` does cleanup including calling class destructor whereas `abort`
does not do any cleanup. In multithreading environment such as ThinLTO or JIT,
threads may share states which mostly are ManagedStatic<>. If faulting thread
tearing down a class when another thread is using it, there are chances of
memory corruption. This is bad 1. It will stop error reporting like pretty
stack printer; 2. The memory corruption is distracting and nondeterministic in
terms of error message, and corruption type (depending one the timing, it
could be double free, heap free after use, etc.).
Reviewers: rnk, chandlerc, zturner, sepavloff, MaskRay, espindola
Reviewed By: rnk, MaskRay
Subscribers: wuzish, jholewinski, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, arichardson, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, cfe-commits, MaskRay, filcab, davide, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, rupprecht, seiya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67847
Summary: Use an `i` constraint in the test, to correctly trigger the code for
handling the `z` constraint modifier.
Reviewers: asb, lenary, jrtc27
Reviewed By: lenary, jrtc27
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72134
if users don't specific -mattr, the default target-feature come
from IR attribute.
Reviewers: lenary, asb
Reviewed By: lenary, asb
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70837
Enabling shrink wrapping requires ensuring the insertion point of the
epilogue is correct for MBBs without a terminator, in which case the
instruction to adjust the stack pointer is the last instruction in the
block.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62190
Summary: These seem to be the machine operand types currently needed by the
RISC-V target.
Reviewers: asb, lenary
Reviewed By: lenary
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72275
When the "disable-tail-calls" attribute was added, checks were added for
it in various backends. Now this code has proliferated, and it is
something the target is responsible for checking. Move that
responsibility back to the ISels (fast, global, and SD).
There's no major functionality change, except for targets that never
implemented this check.
This LLVM attribute was originally added in
d9699bc7bd (2015).
Reviewers: echristo, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72118
This patch enables the machine outliner for RISC-V and adds the
necessary logic for checking whether sequences can be safely outlined,
and describing how they should be outlined. Outlined functions are
called using the register t0 (x5) as the return address register, which
must be available for an occurrence of a sequence to be safely outlined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66210
expected failed test (RV32IF-ILP32F) will be fixed in a subsequent patch.
Reviewers: efriedma, lenary, asb
Reviewed By: efriedma, lenary
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70116
Luís Marques