GNU as rejects them and there are configure scripts in the wild that check if
the assembler rejects ".align 3" to determine whether the alignment is in bytes
or powers of two.
llvm-svn: 175360
This is a candidate for the stable branch.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 175356
It's completely unnecessary and can be replace with proper
SReg_64 handling instead.
This actually fixes a piglit test on SI.
v2: use correct register class in addRegisterClass,
set special classes as not allocatable
v3: revert setting special classes as not allocateable
This is a candidate for the stable branch.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 175355
Seems to be allot simpler, and also paves the
way for further improvements.
v2: rebased on master, use 0 in BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW,
use VGPR0 in dummy EXP, avoid compiler warning, break
after encoding the first literal.
v3: correctly use V_ADD_F32_e64
This is a candidate for the stable branch.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 175354
Mark all the operands that can also have an immediate.
v2: SOFFSET is also an SSrc_32 operand
This is a candidate for the stable branch.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 175353
Previously it only worked because of coincident.
v2: fix 64bit versions, use 0x80 (inline 0) instead of SGPR0
for the unused SRC2
This is a candidate for the stable branch.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 175352
This is a candidate for the stable branch.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 175351
This is a candidate for the stable branch.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 175350
Stop adding more instructions than necessary.
This is a candidate for the stable branch.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 175349
Generate more than one loop if it seems to make sense.
This is a candidate for the stable branch.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 175348
Using the new NearestCommonDominator class.
This is a candidate for the stable branch.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 175347
Using the new NearestCommonDominator class.
This is a candidate for the stable branch.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 175346
This is a candidate for the stable branch.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 175345
Neither of the current clients of CFGRecStmtDeclVisitor are doing
anything with typedefs, so I assume type aliases (C++11 "using")
can be safely ignored. This was causing assertion failures in
the analyzer.
<rdar://problem/13228440>
llvm-svn: 175335
If the frame pointer is omitted, and any stack changes occur in the inline
assembly, e.g.: "pusha", then any C local variable or C argument references
will be incorrect.
I pass no judgement on anyone who would do such a thing. ;)
rdar://13218191
llvm-svn: 175334
linkonce_odr. Emit construction vtables as internal in this case, since the ABI
does not guarantee that they will be availble externally.
llvm-svn: 175330
until recursive loading is finished.
Otherwise we may end up with a template trying to deserialize a template
parameter that is in the process of getting loaded.
rdar://13135282
llvm-svn: 175329
for distinguishing type vs. value visibility.
The changes to the visibility of explicit specializations
are intentional. The change to the "ugly" test case is
a consequence of a sensible implementation, and I am happy
to argue that this is better behavior. Other changes may
or may not be intended; it is quite difficult to divine
intent from some of the code I altered.
I've left behind a comment which I hope explains the
philosophy behind visibility computation.
llvm-svn: 175326
Split some NS* formatters in their own source files
Refactored a utility function for the C++ formatters to use
Fixed the skip-summary test case to be explicit about requiring libstdc++ for operation
llvm-svn: 175323
- removed an unnecessary variable
- fixed an issue where we sometimes
wrote too much data into a buffer
- made the recognition of variables
as "this" a little more conservative
<rdar://problem/13216268>
llvm-svn: 175318
Input/Output rewrite to the same location. Make sure the SizeDirective rewrite
is performed first. This also ensure the sort algorithm is stable.
llvm-svn: 175317
Benjamin Kramer