We've decided to make the core rewriter class and PP rewriters mandatory.
They're only a few hundred lines of code in total and not worth supporting as a
distinct build configuration, especially since doing so disables key compiler
features.
This reverts commit r213150.
Revert "clang/test: Introduce the feature "rewriter" for --enable-clang-rewriter."
This reverts commit r213148.
Revert "Move clang/test/Frontend/rewrite-*.c to clang/test/Frontend/Rewriter/"
This reverts commit r213146.
llvm-svn: 213159
C++ [basic.start.main]p1: "It shall have a return type of type int"
ISO C is also clear about this, so only accept 'int' with qualifiers in GNUMode
C.
llvm-svn: 212171
Sema::MergeFunctionDecl attempts merging two decls even if the old decl
is invalid. This can lead to interesting circumstances where we
successfully merge the decls but the result makes no sense.
Take the following for example:
template <typename T>
int main(void);
int main(void);
Sema will not consider these to be overloads of the same name because
main can't be overloaded, which means that this must be a redeclaration.
In this case the templated decl is compatible with the non-templated
decl allowing the Sema::CheckFunctionDeclaration machinery to move on
and do bizarre things like setting the previous decl of a non-templated
decl to a templated decl!
The way I see it, we should just bail from MergeFunctionDecl if the old
decl is invalid.
This fixes PR16531.
llvm-svn: 185779
This boils down to us sending invalid function decls to
CheckFunctionDeclaration becauswe we did not consider that CheckMain
could cause the decl to be invalid. Instead, interogate the new decl's
main-validity and *then* send it over to get CheckFunctionDeclaration'd
if it was still valid after calling CheckMain.
llvm-svn: 185745
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
redeclarations of main appropriately rather than allowing it to be
overloaded. Also, disallowing declaring main as a template.
Fixes GCC DejaGNU g++.old-deja/g++.other/main1.C.
llvm-svn: 117029
Darwin's sekrit fourth argument. This should probably be factored to
let targets make target-specific decisions about what main() should look like.
Fixes rdar://problem/7414990
or if different platforms have radically different ideas of what they want in
llvm-svn: 92128
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
Alp Toker