sleep(1) does not guaranty afterfork order.
Also relative child/parent afterfork order is not important for this test so we
can just avoid checking that.
Reviewed By: dvyukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102810
Commit efd254b636 ("tsan: fix deadlock in pthread_atfork callbacks")
fixed another deadlock related to atfork handling.
But builders with DCHECKs enabled reported failures of
pthread_atfork_deadlock2.c and pthread_atfork_deadlock3.c tests
related to the fact that we hold runtime locks on interceptor exit:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/70/builds/6727
This issue is somewhat inherent to the current approach,
we indeed execute user code (atfork callbacks) with runtime lock held.
Refactor fork handling to not run user code (atfork callbacks)
with runtime locks held. This change does this by installing
own atfork callbacks during runtime initialization.
Atfork callbacks run in LIFO order, so the expectation is that
our callbacks run last, right before the actual fork.
This way we lock runtime mutexes around fork, but not around
user callbacks.
Extend tests to also install after fork callbacks just to cover
more scenarios. Some tests also started reporting real races
that we previously suppressed.
Also extend tests to cover fork syscall support.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101517
Commit efd254b636 ("tsan: fix deadlock in pthread_atfork callbacks")
fixed another deadlock related to atfork handling.
But builders with DCHECKs enabled reported failures of
pthread_atfork_deadlock2.c and pthread_atfork_deadlock3.c tests
related to the fact that we hold runtime locks on interceptor exit:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/70/builds/6727
This issue is somewhat inherent to the current approach,
we indeed execute user code (atfork callbacks) with runtime lock held.
Refactor fork handling to not run user code (atfork callbacks)
with runtime locks held. This change does this by installing
own atfork callbacks during runtime initialization.
Atfork callbacks run in LIFO order, so the expectation is that
our callbacks run last, right before the actual fork.
This way we lock runtime mutexes around fork, but not around
user callbacks.
Extend tests to also install after fork callbacks just to cover
more scenarios. Some tests also started reporting real races
that we previously suppressed.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101385
We take report/thread_registry locks around fork.
This means we cannot report any bugs in atfork handlers.
We resolved this by enabling per-thread ignores around fork.
This resolved some of the cases, but not all.
The added test triggers a race report from a signal handler
called from atfork callback, we reset per-thread ignores
around signal handlers, so we tried to report it and deadlocked.
But there are more cases: a signal handler can be called
synchronously if it's sent to itself. Or any other report
types would cause deadlocks as well: mutex misuse,
signal handler spoiling errno, etc.
Disable all reports for the duration of fork with
thr->suppress_reports and don't re-enable them around
signal handlers.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101154
Vitaly Buka