Doing "I++" inside of an EXPECT_* triggers
warning: expression with side effects has no effect in an unevaluated context
because EXPECT_* partially expands to
EqHelper<(sizeof(::testing::internal::IsNullLiteralHelper(MockObjects[I++] + 1)) == 1)>
which is an unevaluated context.
llvm-svn: 275293
Summary: Normally when you do a bitwise operation on an enum value, you
get back an instance of the underlying type (e.g. int). But using this
macro, bitwise ops on your enum will return you back instances of the
enum. This is particularly useful for enums which represent a
combination of flags.
Suppose you have a function which takes an int and a set of flags. One
way to do this would be to take two numeric params:
enum SomeFlags { F1 = 1, F2 = 2, F3 = 4, ... };
void Fn(int Num, int Flags);
void foo() {
Fn(42, F2 | F3);
}
But now if you get the order of arguments wrong, you won't get an error.
You might try to fix this by changing the signature of Fn so it accepts
a SomeFlags arg:
enum SomeFlags { F1 = 1, F2 = 2, F3 = 4, ... };
void Fn(int Num, SomeFlags Flags);
void foo() {
Fn(42, static_cast<SomeFlags>(F2 | F3));
}
But now we need a static cast after doing "F2 | F3" because the result
of that computation is the enum's underlying type.
This patch adds a mechanism which gives us the safety of the second
approach with the brevity of the first.
enum SomeFlags {
F1 = 1, F2 = 2, F3 = 4, ..., F_MAX = 128,
LLVM_MARK_AS_BITMASK_ENUM(F_MAX)
};
void Fn(int Num, SomeFlags Flags);
void foo() {
Fn(42, F2 | F3); // No static_cast.
}
The LLVM_MARK_AS_BITMASK_ENUM macro enables overloads for bitwise
operators on SomeFlags. Critically, these operators return the enum
type, not its underlying type, so you don't need any static_casts.
An advantage of this solution over the previously-proposed BitMask class
[0, 1] is that we don't need any wrapper classes -- we can operate
directly on the enum itself.
The approach here is somewhat similar to OpenOffice's typed_flags_set
[2]. But we skirt the need for a wrapper class (and a good deal of
complexity) by judicious use of enable_if. We SFINAE on the presence of
a particular enumerator (added by the LLVM_MARK_AS_BITMASK_ENUM macro)
instead of using a traits class so that it's impossible to use the enum
before the overloads are present. The solution here also seamlessly
works across multiple namespaces.
[0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150622/283369.html
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150623/073434b6/attachment.obj
[2] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/include/o3tl/typed_flags_set.hxx
Reviewers: chandlerc, rsmith
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22279
llvm-svn: 275292
Because of the goop involved in the EXPECT_EQ macro, we were getting the
following warning
expression with side effects has no effect in an unevaluated context
because the "I++" was being used inside of a template type:
switch (0) case 0: default: if (const ::testing::AssertionResult gtest_ar = (::testing::internal:: EqHelper<(sizeof(::testing::internal::IsNullLiteralHelper(Args[I++])) == 1)>::Compare("Args[I++]", "&A", Args[I++], &A))) ; else ::testing::internal::AssertHelper(::testing::TestPartResult::kNonFatalFailure, "../src/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp", 94, gtest_ar.failure_message()) = ::testing::Message();
llvm-svn: 275291
Summary:
This represents the adjustment applied to the implicit 'this' parameter
in the prologue of a virtual method in the MS C++ ABI. The adjustment is
always zero unless multiple inheritance is involved.
This increases the size of DISubprogram by 8 bytes, unfortunately. The
adjustment really is a signed 32-bit integer. If this size increase is
too much, we could probably win it back by splitting out a subclass with
info specific to virtual methods (virtuality, vindex, thisadjustment,
containingType).
Reviewers: aprantl, dexonsmith
Subscribers: aaboud, amccarth, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21614
llvm-svn: 274325
When concatenating two error lists the ErrorList::join method (which is called
by joinErrors) was failing to set the checked bit on the second error, leading
to a 'failure to check error' assertion.
llvm-svn: 274249
re-insertion of entries into the worklist moves them to the end.
This is fairly similar to a SetVector, but helps in the case where in
addition to not inserting duplicates you want to adjust the sequence of
a pop-off-the-back worklist.
I'm not at all attached to the name of this data structure if others
have better suggestions, but this is one that David Majnemer brought up
in IRC discussions that seems plausible.
I've trimmed the interface down somewhat from SetVector's interface
because several things make less sense here IMO: iteration primarily.
I'd prefer to add these back as we have users that need them. My use
case doesn't even need all of what is provided here. =]
I've also included a basic unittest to make sure this functions
reasonably.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21866
llvm-svn: 274198
This fixes an issue where occurrence counts would be unexpectedly
reset when parsing different parts of a command line multiple
times.
**ORIGINAL COMMIT MESSAGE**
This allows command line tools to use syntaxes like the following:
llvm-foo.exe command1 -o1 -o2
llvm-foo.exe command2 -p1 -p2
Where command1 and command2 contain completely different sets of
valid options. This is backwards compatible with previous uses
of llvm cl which did not support subcommands, as any option
which specifies no optional subcommand (e.g. all existing
code) goes into a special "top level" subcommand that expects
dashed options to appear immediately after the program name.
For example, code which is subcommand unaware would generate
a command line such as the following, where no subcommand
is specified:
llvm-foo.exe -q1 -q2
The top level subcommand can co-exist with actual subcommands,
as it is implemented as an actual subcommand which is searched
if no explicit subcommand is specified. So llvm-foo.exe as
specified above could be written so as to support all three
aforementioned command lines simultaneously.
There is one additional "special" subcommand called AllSubCommands,
which can be used to inject an option into every subcommand.
This is useful to support things like help, so that commands
such as:
llvm-foo.exe --help
llvm-foo.exe command1 --help
llvm-foo.exe command2 --help
All work and display the help for the selected subcommand
without having to explicitly go and write code to handle each
one separately.
This patch is submitted without an example of anything actually
using subcommands, but a followup patch will convert the
llvm-pdbdump tool to use subcommands.
Reviewed By: beanz
llvm-svn: 274171
This allows command line tools to use syntaxes like the following:
llvm-foo.exe command1 -o1 -o2
llvm-foo.exe command2 -p1 -p2
Where command1 and command2 contain completely different sets of
valid options. This is backwards compatible with previous uses
of llvm cl which did not support subcommands, as any option
which specifies no optional subcommand (e.g. all existing
code) goes into a special "top level" subcommand that expects
dashed options to appear immediately after the program name.
For example, code which is subcommand unaware would generate
a command line such as the following, where no subcommand
is specified:
llvm-foo.exe -q1 -q2
The top level subcommand can co-exist with actual subcommands,
as it is implemented as an actual subcommand which is searched
if no explicit subcommand is specified. So llvm-foo.exe as
specified above could be written so as to support all three
aforementioned command lines simultaneously.
There is one additional "special" subcommand called AllSubCommands,
which can be used to inject an option into every subcommand.
This is useful to support things like help, so that commands
such as:
llvm-foo.exe --help
llvm-foo.exe command1 --help
llvm-foo.exe command2 --help
All work and display the help for the selected subcommand
without having to explicitly go and write code to handle each
one separately.
This patch is submitted without an example of anything actually
using subcommands, but a followup patch will convert the
llvm-pdbdump tool to use subcommands.
Reviewed By: beanz
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21485
llvm-svn: 274054
The bitset metadata currently used in LLVM has a few problems:
1. It has the wrong name. The name "bitset" refers to an implementation
detail of one use of the metadata (i.e. its original use case, CFI).
This makes it harder to understand, as the name makes no sense in the
context of virtual call optimization.
2. It is represented using a global named metadata node, rather than
being directly associated with a global. This makes it harder to
manipulate the metadata when rebuilding global variables, summarise it
as part of ThinLTO and drop unused metadata when associated globals are
dropped. For this reason, CFI does not currently work correctly when
both CFI and vcall opt are enabled, as vcall opt needs to rebuild vtable
globals, and fails to associate metadata with the rebuilt globals. As I
understand it, the same problem could also affect ASan, which rebuilds
globals with a red zone.
This patch solves both of those problems in the following way:
1. Rename the metadata to "type metadata". This new name reflects how
the metadata is currently being used (i.e. to represent type information
for CFI and vtable opt). The new name is reflected in the name for the
associated intrinsic (llvm.type.test) and pass (LowerTypeTests).
2. Attach metadata directly to the globals that it pertains to, rather
than using the "llvm.bitsets" global metadata node as we are doing now.
This is done using the newly introduced capability to attach
metadata to global variables (r271348 and r271358).
See also: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-June/100462.html
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21053
llvm-svn: 273729
This change is motivated by an upcoming change to the metadata representation
used for CFI. The indirect function call checker needs type information for
external function declarations in order to correctly generate jump table
entries for such declarations. We currently associate such type information
with declarations using a global metadata node, but I plan [1] to move all
such metadata to global object attachments.
In bitcode, metadata attachments for function declarations appear in the
global metadata block. This seems reasonable to me because I expect metadata
attachments on declarations to be uncommon. In the long term I'd also expect
this to be the case for CFI, because we'd want to use some specialized bitcode
format for this metadata that could be read as part of the ThinLTO thin-link
phase, which would mean that it would not appear in the global metadata block.
To solve the lazy loaded metadata issue I was seeing with D20147, I use the
same bitcode representation for metadata attachments for global variables as I
do for function declarations. Since there's a use case for metadata attachments
in the global metadata block, we might as well use that representation for
global variables as well, at least until we have a mechanism for lazy loading
global variables.
In the assembly format, the metadata attachments appear after the "declare"
keyword in order to avoid a parsing ambiguity.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-June/100462.html
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21052
llvm-svn: 273336
We recently made MemorySSA own the walker it creates. As a part of this,
the MSSA test fixture was changed to have a `Walker*` instead of a
`unique_ptr<Walker>`. So, we no longer need to do `&*Walker` in order to
get a `Walker*`.
llvm-svn: 273189
pass manager passes' `run` methods.
This removes a bunch of SFINAE goop from the pass manager and just
requires pass authors to accept `AnalysisManager<IRUnitT> &` as a dead
argument. This is a small price to pay for the simplicity of the system
as a whole, despite the noise that changing it causes at this stage.
This will also helpfull allow us to make the signature of the run
methods much more flexible for different kinds af passes to support
things like intelligently updating the pass's progression over IR units.
While this touches many, many, files, the changes are really boring.
Mostly made with the help of my trusty perl one liners.
Thanks to Sean and Hal for bouncing ideas for this with me in IRC.
llvm-svn: 272978
We should update results of the BranchProbabilityInfo after removing block in JumpThreading. Otherwise
we will get dangling pointer inside BranchProbabilityInfo cache.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20957
llvm-svn: 272891
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19842
Corresponding clang patch: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19843
Re-commit after addressing issues with of generating too many warnings for Windows and asan test failures
Patch by Eric Niebler
llvm-svn: 272555
undef uses are no real uses of a register and must be ignored by
findLastUseBefore() so that handleMove() does not produce invalid live
intervals in some cases.
This fixed http://llvm.org/PR28083
llvm-svn: 272446
This fixes an alignment issue by forcing all cached allocations
to be 8 byte aligned, and also fixes an issue arising on big
endian systems by writing ulittle32_t's instead of uint32_t's
in the test.
llvm-svn: 272437
This adds method and tests for writing to a PDB stream. With
this, even a PDB stream which is discontiguous can be treated
as a sequential stream of bytes for the purposes of writing.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21157
llvm-svn: 272369
Summary:
Now DISubroutineType has a 'cc' field which should be a DW_CC_ enum. If
it is present and non-zero, the backend will emit it as a
DW_AT_calling_convention attribute. On the CodeView side, we translate
it to the appropriate enum for the LF_PROCEDURE record.
I added a new LLVM vendor specific enum to the list of DWARF calling
conventions. DWARF does not appear to attempt to standardize these, so I
assume it's OK to do this until we coordinate with GCC on how to emit
vectorcall convention functions.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, majnemer, aaboud, amccarth
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21114
llvm-svn: 272197
The architecture enumeration is shared across ARM and AArch64. However, the
data is not. The code incorrectly would index into the array using the
architecture index which was offset by the ARMv7 architecture enumeration. We
do not have a marker for indicating the architectural family to which the
enumeration belongs so we cannot be clever about offsetting the index (at least
it is not immediately apparent to me). Instead, fall back to the tried-and-true
method of slowly iterating the array (its not a large array, so the impact of
this is not too high).
Because of the incorrect indexing, if we were lucky, we would crash, but usually
we would return an invalid StringRef. We did not have any tests for the AArch64
target parser previously;. Extend the previous tests I had added for ARM to
cover AArch64 for ensuring that we return expected StringRefs.
Take the opportunity to change some iterator types to references.
This work is needed to support parsing `.arch name` directives in the AArch64
target asm parser.
llvm-svn: 272145
This allows mapping of any endian-aware type whose underlying
type (e.g. uint32_t) provides a ScalarTraits specialization.
Reviewed by: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21057
llvm-svn: 272049
Arrange to call verify(Function &) on each function, followed by
verify(Module &), whether the verifier is being used from the pass or
from verifyModule(). As a side effect, this fixes an issue that caused
us not to call verify(Function &) on unmaterialized functions from
verifyModule().
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21042
llvm-svn: 271956
Also fix slice wrappers drop_front and drop_back.
The unittests are pretty awkward, but do the job; alternatives
welcome!
..and yes, I do have ArrayRefs with more than 4 billion elements.
llvm-svn: 271546
We only considered the length of the operation and the length of the
StreamRef without considered what it meant for the offset to be at a
non-zero position.
llvm-svn: 271496
Justin Lebar