Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Fangrui Song 3d87323a7e [ELF] Make non-writable non-executable PROGBITS sections closer to .text
This generalizes the old heuristic placing SHT_DYNSYM SHT_DYNSTR first in the readonly SHF_ALLOC segment.

Reviewers: espindola

Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48406

llvm-svn: 335674
2018-06-26 22:13:32 +00:00
Han Shen b56030ee9e [lld] Mitigate relocation overflow [part 1 of 2].
This CL places .dynsym and .dynstr at the beginning of SHF_ALLOC
sections. We do this to mitigate the possibility that huge .dynsym and
.dynstr sections placed between ro-data and text sections cause
relocation overflow.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45788

llvm-svn: 332374
2018-05-15 17:02:35 +00:00
George Rimar 4c9ae67bb7 [ELF] - Revert of: r332038, r332054, r332060, r332061, r332062, r332063
This reverts "Mitigate relocation overflow [part 1 of 2]." and the following commits which
were trying to fix the bots.

At the moment of r332082, bots are still failing and we need to find the reason of test case breakages first of all.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-windows10pro-fast/builds/17042/steps/test/logs/stdio
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-ubuntu-fast/builds/29845/steps/test/logs/stdio

llvm-svn: 332085
2018-05-11 08:11:25 +00:00
Han Shen 6c0881c3cd Mitigate relocation overflow [part 1 of 2].
This CL is to mitigate R_X86_64_PC32 relocation overflow problems for huge binaries that has near 4G allocated sections.

By examining those binaries, there're 2 issues contributes to the problem:
1). huge ".dynsym" and ".dynstr" stands in the way between .rodata and .text
2). _init_array_start/end are placed at 0 if no ".init_array" presents, this causes .text relocation against them become more prone to overflow.

This CL addresses 1st problem (the 2nd will be addressed in another CL.) by assigning a smaller sortrank to .dynsym and .dynstr thus they no longer stand in between.

llvm-svn: 332038
2018-05-10 20:44:42 +00:00
George Rimar 271ed6eb0d [ELF] - Convert overlapping-sections.s testcase to x86 and cleanup.
Patch do the following changes:

* Test case was converted from MIPS to x86.

* Removed part of the test checking we are able to produce a valid output.
  Since we do that already in other tests, this one's intention should be
  only to check we are still able to report overlaps and/or produce
  broken output with overlaps.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44438

llvm-svn: 327480
2018-03-14 07:44:23 +00:00
George Rimar bf3c384673 [ELF] - Adjust rangeToString to report ranges in a different format.
It was raised during the review of D43819.

LLD usually use [X, Y] for reporting ranges, like below:
"relocation R_386_16 out of range: 65536 is not in [0, 65535]"

Patch changes rangeToString() to do the same.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44207

llvm-svn: 326918
2018-03-07 17:54:25 +00:00
Rui Ueyama 532fa0e1ca Make sure that --no-check-sections doesn't print out warning messages.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42988

llvm-svn: 324434
2018-02-07 00:41:34 +00:00
Rui Ueyama 6a8e79b8e5 Add -{no,}-check-sections flags to enable/disable section overlchecking
GNU linkers have this option.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42858

llvm-svn: 324150
2018-02-02 22:24:06 +00:00
Alexander Richardson 6b367faa45 [ELF] Make overlapping output sections an error
Summary:
While trying to make a linker script behave the same way with lld as it did
with bfd, I discovered that lld currently doesn't diagnose overlapping
output sections. I was getting very strange runtime failures which I
tracked down to overlapping sections in the resulting binary. When linking
with ld.bfd overlapping output sections are an error unless
--noinhibit-exec is passed and I believe lld should behave the same way
here to avoid surprising crashes at runtime.

The patch also uncovered an errors in the tests: arm-thumb-interwork-thunk
was creating a binary where .got.plt was placed at an address overlapping
with .got.

Reviewers: ruiu, grimar, rafael

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41046

llvm-svn: 323856
2018-01-31 09:22:44 +00:00