While here, update some ppc64le specific check to isPPC64(), if it
applies to big-endian as well, in the hope that it will ease the support
of big-endian if people are interested in this area. The big-endian
variant is used by at least FreeBSD, Gentoo Linux, Adélie Linux, and
Void Linux.
llvm-svn: 360868
Summary:
This is needed for gcc/cstdlib++ 5.4.0, where __get_cpuid_count is not
defined in cpuid.h.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61036
llvm-svn: 359120
This was updated in r356703 to use llvm::sys::RetryAfterSignal, which
comes from llvm/Support/Errno.h. The header wasn't added, so it fails if
you compile for arm64/aarch64.
llvm-svn: 358530
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
Summary:
We're using ptrace(PTRACE_SETREGSET, NT_X86_XSTATE) to write all non-gpt
registers on x86 linux. Unfortunately, this method has a quirk, where
the kernel rejects all attempts to write to this area if one supplies a
buffer which is smaller than the area size (even though the kernel will
happily accept partial reads from it).
This means that if the CPU supports some new registers/extensions that
we don't know about (in my case it was the PKRU extension), we will fail
to write *any* non-gpr registers, even those that we know about.
Since this is a situation that's likely to appear again and again, I add
code to NativeRegisterContextLinux_x86_64 to detect the runtime size of
the area, and allocate an appropriate buffer. This does not mean that we
will start automatically supporting all new extensions, but it does mean
that the new extensions will not prevent the old ones from working.
This fixes tests attempting to write to non-gpr registers on new intel
processors (cca Kaby Lake Refresh).
Reviewers: jankratochvil, davezarzycki
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59991
llvm-svn: 357376
The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.
In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to
::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good
opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.
I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have
any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up
at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please
know that the change was unintentional.
llvm-svn: 353912
The "signal" argument was removed from the MonitorCallback function, but
not from the log statements within it. This wasn't noticed because the
name "signal" suddenly started referring to the libc function with that
name.
This fixes that.
llvm-svn: 353419
Summary:
These classes describe the details of the process we are about to
launch, and so they are naturally used by the launching code in the Host
module. Previously they were present in Target because that is the most
important (but by far not the only) user of the launching code.
Since the launching code has other customers, must of which do not care
about Targets, it makes sense to move these classes to the Host layer,
next to the launching code.
This move reduces the number of times that Target is included from host
to 8 (it used to be 14).
Reviewers: zturner, clayborg, jingham, davide, teemperor
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56602
llvm-svn: 353047
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
Summary:
A fairly simple operation as setting a breakpoint (writing a breakpoint
opcode) at a given address was going through three classes:
NativeProcessProtocol which called NativeBreakpointList, which then
called SoftwareBrekpoint, only to end up again in NativeProcessProtocol
to do the actual writing itself. This is unnecessarily complex and can
be simplified by moving all of the logic into NativeProcessProtocol
class itself, removing a lot of boilerplate.
One of the reeasons for this complexity was that (it seems)
NativeBreakpointList class was meant to hold both software and hardware
breakpoints. However, that never materialized, and hardware breakpoints
are stored in a separate map holding only hardware breakpoints.
Essentially, this patch makes software breakpoints follow that approach
by replacing the heavy SoftwareBraekpoint with a light struct of the
same name, which holds only the data necessary to describe one
breakpoint. The rest of the logic is in the main class. As, at the
lldb-server level, handling software and hardware breakpoints is very
different, this seems like a reasonable state of things.
Reviewers: krytarowski, zturner, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52941
llvm-svn: 346093
This patch removes the logic for resolving paths out of FileSpec and
updates call sites to rely on the FileSystem class instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53915
llvm-svn: 345890
Summary:
This function existed (with identical code) in both NativeProcessLinux
and NativeProcessNetBSD, and it is likely that it would be useful to any
future implementation of NativeProcessProtocol.
Therefore I move it to the base class.
Reviewers: krytarowski
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52719
llvm-svn: 343683
Summary:
This function encodes the knowledge of whether the PC points to the
breakpoint instruction of the one following it after the breakpoint is
"hit". This behavior mainly(*) depends on the architecture and not on the
OS, so it makes sense for it to be implemented in the base class, where
it can be shared between different implementations (Linux and NetBSD
atm).
(*) It is possible for an OS to expose a different API, perhaps by doing
some fixups in the kernel. In this case, the implementation can override
this function to implement custom behavior.
Reviewers: krytarowski, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52532
llvm-svn: 343409
The two existing implementations have the function implemented
identically, and there's no reason to believe that this would be
different for other implementations.
llvm-svn: 342167
This recommits r341487, which was reverted due to failing tests with
clang. It turned out I had incorrectly expected that the literal arrays
passed to ArrayRef constructor will have static (permanent) storage.
This was only the case with gcc, while clang was constructing them on
stack, leading to dangling pointers when the function returns.
The fix is to explicitly assign static storage duration to the opcode
arrays.
llvm-svn: 341758
return the opcode as a Expected<ArrayRef> instead of a
Status+pointer+size combo.
I also move the linux implementation to the base class, as the trap
opcodes are likely to be the same for all/most implementations of the
class (except the arm one, where linux chooses a different opcode than
what the arm spec recommends, which I keep linux-specific).
llvm-svn: 341487
These three classes have no external dependencies, but they are used
from various low-level APIs. Moving them down to Utility improves
overall code layering (although it still does not break any particular
dependency completely).
The XCode project will need to be updated after this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49740
llvm-svn: 339127
Most non-local includes of header files living under lldb/sources/
were specified with the full path starting after sources/. However, in
a few instances, other sub-directories were added to include paths, or
Normalize those few instances to follow the style used by the rest of
the codebase, to make it easier to understand.
llvm-svn: 333035
This brings the LLDB configuration closer to LLVM's and removes visual
clutter in the source code by removing the @brief commands from
comments.
This patch also reflows the paragraphs in all doxygen comments.
See also https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46321
llvm-svn: 331373
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
Summary:
- reg_nums were missing the end marker entry
- marked FP test to be skipped for ppc64
Reviewers: labath, clayborg
Reviewed By: labath, clayborg
Subscribers: alexandreyy, lbianc, nemanjai, kbarton
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43767
Patch by Leandro Lupori <leandro.lupori@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 326775
Summary:
The PC corresponding to the breakpoint was being calculated wrongly,
which was causing LLDB to never go past the first breakpoint, when
there was a second one adjacent to it.
Reviewers: clayborg, labath
Reviewed By: clayborg, labath
Subscribers: anajuliapc, alexandreyy, lbianc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43344
Patch by Leandro Lupori <leandro.lupori@gmail.com>.
llvm-svn: 325728
Summary:
The ObjectFile class was used to determine the architecture of a running
process by inspecting it's main executable. There were two issues with
this:
- it's in the wrong layer
- the call can be very expensive (it can end up computing the crc of the
whole file).
Since the process is running on the host, ideally we would be able to
just query the data straight from the OS like darwin does, but there
doesn't seem to be a reasonable way to do that. So, this fixes the
layering issue by using the llvm object library to inspect the file.
Since we know the process is already running on the host, we just need
to peek at a few bytes of the elf header to determine whether it's 32-
or 64-bit (which should make this faster as well).
Pretty much the same logic was implemented in
NativeProcessProtocol::ResolveProcessArchitecture, so I delete this
logic and replace calls with GetProcessInfo.
Reviewers: eugene, krytarowski
Subscribers: mgorny, hintonda, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42488
llvm-svn: 323637
Summary:
The x86 FPR struct was defined as a struct containing a union between
two members: XSAVE and FXSAVE. This patch makes FPR a union directly to
remove one layer of indirection when trying to access the members.
The initial layout of these two structs is identical, which is
recognised by the fact that XSAVE has FXSAVE as its first member, so we
also considered removing one more layer and leave FPR identical to XSAVE
struct, but stopped short of doing that, as the FPR may be used to store
different layouts in the future (e.g., ones generated by the FSAVE
instruction).
Reviewers: clayborg, krytarowski
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41245
llvm-svn: 320966
Summary:
lldb-server was sending the "exit" packet (W??) twice. This happened
because it was handling both the pre-exit (PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT) and
post-exit (WIFEXITED) as exit events. We had some code which was trying
to detect when we've already sent the exit packet, but this stopped
working quite a while ago.
This never really caused any problems in practice because the client
automatically closes the connection after receiving the first packet, so
the only effect of this was some warning messages about extra packets
from the lldb-server test suite, which were ignored because they didn't
fail the test.
The new test suite will be stricter about this, so I fix this issue
ignoring the first event. I think this is the correct behavior, as the
inferior is not really dead at that point, so it's premature to send the
exit packet.
There isn't an actual test yet which would verify the exit behavior, but
in my next patch I will add a test which will also test this
functionality.
Reviewers: eugene
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41069
llvm-svn: 320961
struct iovec is used as an interface to system (posix) api's. As such,
we shouldn't be using it in os-independent code, and we shouldn't be
defining our own iovec replacements.
Fortunately, its usage was not very widespread, so the removal was very
easy -- I simply moved a couple declarations into os-specific code.
llvm-svn: 319536
Summary:
New linux kernels (on systems that support the XSAVES instruction) will
not update the inferior registers unless the corresponding flag in the
XSAVE header is set. Normally this flag will be set in our image of the
XSAVE area (since we obtained it from the kernel), but if the inferior
has never used the corresponding register set, the respective flag can
be clear.
This fixes the issue by making sure we explicitly set the flags
corresponding to the registers we modify. I don't try to precisely match
the flags to set on each write, as the rules could get quite complicated
-- I use a simpler over-approximation instead.
This was already caught by test_fp_register_write, but that was only
because the code that ran before main() did not use some of the register
sets. Since nothing in this test relies on being stopped in main(), I
modify the test to stop at the entry point instead, so we can be sure
the inferior did not have a chance to access these registers.
Reviewers: clayborg, valentinagiusti
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40434
llvm-svn: 319161
The rationale here is that ArchSpec is used throughout the codebase,
including in places which should not depend on the rest of the code in
the Core module.
This commit touches many files, but most of it is just renaming of
#include lines. In a couple of cases, I removed the #include ArchSpec
line altogether, as the file was not using it. In one or two places,
this necessitated adding other #includes like lldb-private-defines.h.
llvm-svn: 318048
Summary:
This commit removes the concrete_frame_idx member from
NativeRegisterContext and related functions, which was always set to
zero and never used.
I also change the native thread class to store a NativeRegisterContext
as a unique_ptr (documenting the ownership) and make sure it is always
initialized (most of the code was already blindly dereferencing the
register context pointer, assuming it would always be present -- this
makes its treatment consistent).
Reviewers: eugene, clayborg, krytarowski
Subscribers: aemerson, sdardis, nemanjai, javed.absar, arichardson, kristof.beyls, kbarton, uweigand, alexandreyy, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39837
llvm-svn: 317881
Summary:
These functions used to return bool to signify whether they were able to
retrieve the data. This is redundant because the ArchSpec and ByteOrder
already have their own "invalid" states, *and* because both of the
current implementations (linux, netbsd) can always provide a valid
result.
This allows us to simplify bits of the code handling these values.
Reviewers: eugene, krytarowski
Subscribers: javed.absar, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39733
llvm-svn: 317779
Summary:
The NativeThread class is useless without the containing process (and in
some places it is already assuming the process is always around). This
makes it clear that the NativeProcessProtocol is the object owning the
threads, and makes the destruction order deterministic (first threads,
then process). The NativeProcess is the only thing holding a thread
unique_ptr, and methods that used to hand out thread shared pointers now
return raw pointers or references.
Reviewers: krytarowski, eugene
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35618
llvm-svn: 316007
Add support for ppc64le to create breakpoints and read/write
general purpose registers.
Other features for ppc64le and functions to read/write
other registers are being implemented.
Patch by Alexandre Yukio Yamashita (alexandreyy)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38323
llvm-svn: 315008
Summary:
It defined a couple of types (condition_t) which we don't use anymore,
as we have c++11 goodies now. I remove these definitions.
Also it unnecessarily included a couple of headers which weren't
necessary for it's operation. I remove these, and place the includes in
the relevant files (usually .cpp, usually in Host code) which use them.
This allows us to reduce namespace pollution in most of the lldb files
which don't need the OS-specific definitions.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham
Subscribers: ki.stfu, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35113
llvm-svn: 308304
Summary:
The usage of shared_from_this forces us to separate construction and
initialization phases, because shared_from_this() is not available in
the constructor (or destructor). The shared semantics are not necessary,
as we always have a clear owner of the native process class
(GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLDB object). Even if we need shared
semantics in the future (which I think we should strongly avoid),
reverting this will not be necessary -- the owners can still easily
store the native process object in a shared pointer if they really want
to -- this just prevents the knowledge of that from leaking into the
class implementation.
After this a NativeThread object will hold a reference to the parent
process (instead of a weak_ptr) -- having a process instance always
available allows us to simplify some logic in this class (some of it was
already simplified because we were asserting that the process is
available, but this makes it obvious).
Reviewers: krytarowski, eugene, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35123
llvm-svn: 308282
In NativeProcessLinux::MonitorSIGTRAP we were asserting that the si_code
value is one of the codes we know about. However, that list was very
incomplete -- for example, we were not handling SI_TKILL/SI_USER,
generated by raise(SIGTRAP). A cursory examination show there are at
least a dozen codes like these that an app can generate, and more can be
added at any point.
So, instead of trying to play catchup, I change the default behavior to
treat an unknown si_code like an ordinary signal. The only reason we
needed to inspect si_code in the first place is because
watchpoint/breakpoints are notified as SIGTRAP, but we already know
about those, and us starting to use a new debug event is far less likely
than somebody introducing a new non-debug event.
I add a test case to TestRaise to verify we are handling raise(SIGTRAP)
in an application properly.
llvm-svn: 307644
Fangrui Song