Summary: The options aren't supported so they can be removed.
Reviewers: beanz, smeenai, compnerd
Reviewed By: compnerd
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69877
This patch was reviewed and approved by chandlerc.
"Getting Started with the LLVM System" is the first point of contact for many newcomers in the LLVM community.
* Make the first two paragraphs more welcoming
* Use more inclusive language
Summary:
Back in January I changed the minimum toolchain version required to build clang
and LLVM: D57264. Since then we've release LLVM 8, following
[our process](http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#toolchain)
it's therefore now a good time to remove the soft-error and officially deprecate
older toolchains. I tried this out last Tursday night to see if any bots
complained, and I saw no complaints. I also manually audited bots and didn't see
any bot that should break, but their toolchain information is unreliable and
some bots are offline.
Once this patch stick we'll move to C++14 as we've
[already agreed](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-January/129452.html).
Subscribers: mgorny, jkorous, dexonsmith, llvm-commits, EricWF, thakis, chandlerc
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66188
llvm-svn: 368799
Add cmake to the list of packages required for compiling LLVM.
Also move make to the bottom of the list and mark it as optional.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65438
llvm-svn: 367395
Until recently, Python_ADDITIONAL_VERSIONS was used to limit LLVM's
Python support to 2.7. Now that both LLVM and LLDB both support Python
3, there's no longer a need to put an arbitrary limit on this.
However, instead of removing the variable, r365692 expanded the list,
which has the (presumably unintentional) side-effect of expression
preference for Python 3.
Instead, as Michal proposed in the original code review, we should just
not set the list at all, and let CMake pick whatever Python interpreter
you have in your path.
This patch removes the Python_ADDITIONAL_VERSIONS variable in llvm,
clang and lld. I've also updated the docs with the default behavior and
how to force a different Python version to be used.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64894
llvm-svn: 366447
Summary:
This updates all places in documentation that refer to "Mac OS X", "OS X", etc.
to instead use the modern name "macOS" when no specific version number is
mentioned.
If a specific version is mentioned, this attempts to use the OS name at the time
of that version:
* Mac OS X for 10.0 - 10.7
* OS X for 10.8 - 10.11
* macOS for 10.12 - present
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, arphaman, cfe-commits, lldb-commits, libcxx-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #lldb, #libc, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62654
llvm-svn: 362113
If you want to build clang-tools-extra with monorepo, just add it to
LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS like with other projects.
See also "Separating clang-tools-extra from clang in LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS"
on cfe-dev.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58157
llvm-svn: 354057
Summary:
The RFC on moving past C++11 got good traction:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-January/129452.html
This patch therefore bumps the toolchain versions according to our policy:
llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#toolchain
Subscribers: mgorny, jkorous, dexonsmith, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini, jyknight, rsmith, chandlerc, smeenai, hans, reames, lattner, lhames, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57264
llvm-svn: 353374
Reverting D57264 again, it looks like we're down to two bots that need fixing:
polly-amd64-linux
polly-arm-linux
They both have old versions of libstdc++ and recent clang.
llvm-svn: 352954
Summary:
The RFC on moving past C++11 got good traction:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-January/129452.html
This patch therefore bumps the toolchain versions according to our policy:
llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#toolchain
Subscribers: mgorny, jkorous, dexonsmith, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini, jyknight, rsmith, chandlerc, smeenai, hans, reames, lattner, lhames, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57264
llvm-svn: 352951
Summary:
The RFC on moving past C++11 got good traction:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-January/129452.html
This patch therefore bumps the toolchain versions according to our policy:
llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#toolchain
Subscribers: mgorny, jkorous, dexonsmith, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini, jyknight, rsmith, chandlerc, smeenai, hans, reames, lattner, lhames, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57264
llvm-svn: 352834
A handful of bots are still breaking, either because I missed them in my audit,
they were offline, or something else. I'm contacting their authors, but I'll
revert for now and re-commit later.
llvm-svn: 352814
Summary:
The RFC on moving past C++11 got good traction:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-January/129452.html
This patch therefore bumps the toolchain versions according to our policy:
llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#toolchain
Subscribers: mgorny, jkorous, dexonsmith, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini, jyknight, rsmith, chandlerc, smeenai, hans, reames, lattner, lhames, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57264
llvm-svn: 352811
Summary:
Capture the current agreed-upon toolchain update policy based on the following
discussions:
- LLVM dev meeting 2018 BoF "Migrating to C++14, and beyond!"
llvm.org/devmtg/2018-10/talk-abstracts.html#bof3
- A Short Policy Proposal Regarding Host Compilers
lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123238.html
- Using C++14 code in LLVM (2018)
lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123182.html
- Using C++14 code in LLVM (2017)
lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118673.html
- Using C++14 code in LLVM (2016)
lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/105483.html
- Document and Enforce new Host Compiler Policy
llvm.org/D47073
- Require GCC 5.1 and LLVM 3.5 at a minimum
llvm.org/D46723
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56819
llvm-svn: 351765
official Git repository.
Remove the directions for using git-svn, and demote the prominence of
the svn instructions.
Also, fix a few other issues while I'm in there:
* Mention LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS more.
* Getting started doesn't need to mention test-suite, but should
mention clang and the other projects.
* Remove mentions of "configure", since that's long gone.
I've also adjusted a few other mentions of svn to point to github, but
have not done so comprehensively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56654
llvm-svn: 351130
This makes it easier for someone to copy-paste this line, change the path, and run the command.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49201
llvm-svn: 338254
`misc.highlighting_failure` support was added to `suppress_warnings` in that
version, and the warnings-as-errors docs build relies on it.
llvm-svn: 298277
Summary:
Some changes are made to cmake, especially the addition of a new
LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS option that makes the build system aware of
the monorepo directory structure.
Also a new script is added in llvm/utils/git-svn/. When present in
the $PATH, it enables a `git llvm` command. It is providing at this
point only the ability to push from the git monorepo: `git llvm push`.
It is intended to evolves with more features, for instance I plan on
features like `git llvm show r284955` to help working with sequential
revision numbers.
The push feature is taken from Justin Lebar's script available here:
https://github.com/jlebar/llvm-repo-tools/
Reviewers: jlebar
Subscribers: mgorny, modocache, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26334
llvm-svn: 286123
Summary:
The RFC proposal sent to increase the minimum required GCC version
to 4.8 received a lot of support. See the following thread:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/105955.html,
This patch implements that by updating the docs. I believe the
references to libstdc++ 4.7 issues can be removed as well, please
let me know if that is not the case or if they should be updated
a different way.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25683
llvm-svn: 284497
This backend was supposed to generate C++ code which will re-construct
the LLVM IR passed as input. This seems to me to have very marginal
usefulness in the first place.
However, the code has never been updated to use IRBuilder, which makes
its current value negative -- people who look at the output may be
steered to use the *wrong* C++ APIs to construct IR.
Furthermore, it's generated code that doesn't compile since at least
2013.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19942
llvm-svn: 268631
Justin Bogner