Summary: This is just changing naming and documentation to be general about external definitions that can be imported for cross translation unit analysis. There is at least a plan to add VarDecls: D46421
Reviewers: NoQ, xazax.hun, martong, a.sidorin, george.karpenkov, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: xazax.hun, martong
Subscribers: mgorny, whisperity, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, rnkovacs, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56441
llvm-svn: 350852
This patch introduces a class that can help to build tools that require cross
translation unit facilities. This class allows function definitions to be loaded
from external AST files based on an index. In order to use this functionality an
index is required. The index format is a flat text file but it might be
replaced with a different solution in the near future. USRs are used as names to
look up the functions definitions. This class also does caching to avoid
redundant loading of AST files.
Right now only function defnitions can be loaded using this API because this is
what the in progress cross translation unit feature of the Static Analyzer
requires. In to future this might be extended to classes, types etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34512
llvm-svn: 313975
local-rename action
This commit introduces the clang-refactor tool alongside the local-rename action
which uses the existing renaming engine used by clang-rename. The tool
doesn't actually perform the source transformations yet, it just provides
testing support. This commit also moves only one test from clang-rename over to
test/Refactor. I will continue to move the other tests throughout
development of clang-refactor.
The following options are supported by clang-refactor:
-v: use verbose output
-selection: The source range that corresponds to the portion of the source
that's selected (currently only special command test:<file> is supported).
Please note that a follow-up commit will migrate clang-refactor to
libTooling's common option parser, so clang-refactor will be able to use
the common interface with compilation database and options like -p, -extra-arg,
etc.
The testing support provided by clang-refactor is described below:
When -selection=test:<file> is given, clang-refactor will parse the selection
commands from that file. The selection commands are grouped and the specified
refactoring action invoked by the tool. Each command in a group is expected to
produce an identical result. The precise syntax for the selection commands is
described in a comment in TestSupport.h.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36574
llvm-svn: 313244
This is the first commit for the "Clang-based C/C++ diff tool" GSoC project.
ASTDiff is a new library that computes a structural AST diff between two ASTs
using the gumtree algorithm. Clang-diff is a new Clang tool that will show
the structural code changes between different ASTs.
Patch by Johannes Altmanninger!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34329
llvm-svn: 308731
Recommitted after formal approval.
LLVM's JIT is now the foundation of dynamic-compilation features for many languages. Clang also has low-level support for dynamic compilation (ASTImporter and ExternalASTSource, notably). How the compiler is set up for dynamic parsing is generally left up to individual clients, for example LLDB's C/C++/Objective-C expression parser and the ROOT project.
Although this arrangement offers external clients the flexibility to implement dynamic features as they see fit, the lack of an in-tree client means that subtle bugs can be introduced that cause regressions in the external clients but aren't caught by tests (or users) until much later. LLDB for example regularly encounters complicated ODR violation scenarios where it is not immediately clear who is at fault.
Other external clients (notably, Cling) rely on similar functionality, and another goal is to break this functionality up into composable parts so that any client can be built easily on top of Clang without requiring extensive additional code.
I propose that the parts required to build a simple expression parser be added to Clang. Initially, I aim to have the following features:
A piece that looks up external declarations from a variety of sources (e.g., from previous dynamic compilations, from modules, or from DWARF) and uses clear conflict resolution rules to reconcile differences, with easily understood errors. This functionality will be supported by in-tree tests.
A piece that works hand in hand with the LLVM JIT to resolve the locations of external declarations so that e.g. variables can be redeclared and (for high-performance applications like DTrace) external variables can be accessed directly from the registers where they reside.
This commit adds a tester that parses a sequence of source files and then uses them as source data for an expression. External references are resolved using an ExternalASTSource that responds to name queries using an ASTImporter. This is the setup that LLDB uses, and the motivating reason for MinimalImport in ASTImporter. When complete, this tester will implement the first of the above goals.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27180
llvm-svn: 290367
LLVM's JIT is now the foundation of dynamic-compilation features for many languages. Clang also has low-level support for dynamic compilation (ASTImporter and ExternalASTSource, notably). How the compiler is set up for dynamic parsing is generally left up to individual clients, for example LLDB's C/C++/Objective-C expression parser and the ROOT project.
Although this arrangement offers external clients the flexibility to implement dynamic features as they see fit, the lack of an in-tree client means that subtle bugs can be introduced that cause regressions in the external clients but aren't caught by tests (or users) until much later. LLDB for example regularly encounters complicated ODR violation scenarios where it is not immediately clear who is at fault.
Other external clients (notably, Cling) rely on similar functionality, and another goal is to break this functionality up into composable parts so that any client can be built easily on top of Clang without requiring extensive additional code.
I propose that the parts required to build a simple expression parser be added to Clang. Initially, I aim to have the following features:
- A piece that looks up external declarations from a variety of sources (e.g., from previous dynamic compilations, from modules, or from DWARF) and uses clear conflict resolution rules to reconcile differences, with easily understood errors. This functionality will be supported by in-tree tests.
- A piece that works hand in hand with the LLVM JIT to resolve the locations of external declarations so that e.g. variables can be redeclared and (for high-performance applications like DTrace) external variables can be accessed directly from the registers where they reside.
This commit adds a tester that parses a sequence of source files and then uses them as source data for an expression. External references are resolved using an ExternalASTSource that responds to name queries using an ASTImporter. This is the setup that LLDB uses, and the motivating reason for MinimalImport in ASTImporter. When complete, this tester will implement the first of the above goals.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27180
llvm-svn: 290004
Summary:
One of the goals of programming models that support offloading (e.g. OpenMP) is to enable users to offload with little effort, by annotating the code with a few pragmas. I'd also like to save users the trouble of changing their existent applications' build system. So having the compiler always return a single file instead of one for the host and each target even if the user is doing separate compilation is desirable.
This diff proposes a tool named clang-offload-bundler (happy to change the name if required) that is used to bundle files associated with the same user source file but different targets, or to unbundle a file into separate files associated with different targets.
This tool supports the driver support for OpenMP under review in http://reviews.llvm.org/D9888. The tool is used there to enable separate compilation, so that the very first action on input files that are not source files is a "unbundling action" and the very last non-linking action is a "bundling action".
The format of the bundled files is currently very simple: text formats are concatenated with comments that have a magic string and target identifying triple in between, and binary formats have a header that contains the triple and the offset and size of the code for host and each target.
The goal is to improve this tool in the future to deal with archive files so that each individual file in the archive is properly dealt with. We see that archives are very commonly used in current applications to combine separate compilation results. So I'm convinced users would enjoy this feature.
This tool can be used like this:
`clang-offload-bundler -targets=triple1,triple2 -type=ii -inputs=a.triple1.ii,a.triple2.ii -outputs=a.ii`
or
`clang-offload-bundler -targets=triple1,triple2 -type=ii -outputs=a.triple1.ii,a.triple2.ii -inputs=a.ii -unbundle`
I implemented the tool under clang/tools. Please let me know if something like this should live somewhere else.
This patch is prerequisite for http://reviews.llvm.org/D9888.
Reviewers: hfinkel, rsmith, echristo, chandlerc, tra, jlebar, ABataev, Hahnfeld
Subscribers: whchung, caomhin, andreybokhanko, arpith-jacob, carlo.bertolli, mehdi_amini, guansong, Hahnfeld, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D13909
llvm-svn: 279632
The rewrite facility's footprint is small so it's not worth going to these
lengths to support disabling at configure time, particularly since key compiler
features now depend on it.
Meanwhile the Objective-C rewriters have been moved under the
ENABLE_CLANG_ARCMT umbrella for now as they're comparatively heavy and still
potentially worth excluding from lightweight builds.
Tests are now passing with any combination of feature flags. The flags
historically haven't been tested by LLVM's build servers so caveat emptor.
llvm-svn: 213171
This makes it possible to build the clang-format vs plugin from the cmake build.
It is a hack, as it shells out to "devenv" to actually build it, but it's hidden
away in a corner behind a flag, and it provides a convenient way of building the
plug-in from the command-line together with the rest of clang.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2310
llvm-svn: 196299
Thanks for pointing this out, Stephen. I think this is right now -- I
attempted to try all four valid combinations with both the autoconf and
CMake builds.
See also LLVM changes to the configure script.
llvm-svn: 189027
Previously, the CMake build still tried to link clang against the static
analyzer libraries, even if CLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER was off.
Furthermore, clang-check depends on the analyzer, so it should be disabled
(in both CMake and configure builds).
In theory, clang-check could be made to conditionally include analyzer
support (like clang itself), but for now this at least gets a CMake ALL_BUILD
working.
Patch by Stephen Kelly, modified by me.
llvm-svn: 185548
if checked out under clang/tools/extra.
This is mostly so folks other than me can start to test. Documentation,
details, and an announcement are still in the works.
llvm-svn: 161405
Provides an API to run clang tools (FrontendActions) as standalone tools,
or repeatedly in-memory in a process. This is useful for unit-testing,
map-reduce style applications, source transformation daemons or command line
tools.
The ability to run over multiple translation units with different command
line arguments enables building up refactoring tools that need to apply
transformations across translation unit boundaries.
See tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp for an example.
llvm-svn: 154008
Some interesting stats from 'diagtool list-warnings' on the current version of clang:
Percentage of warnings with flags: 48.79%
Number of unique flags: 148
Average number of diagnostics per flag: 2.041
llvm-svn: 137109
This is a new mode of migration, where we avoid modifying the original files but
we emit temporary files instead.
<path> will be used to keep migration process metadata. Currently the temporary files
that are produced are put in the system's temp directory but we can put them
in the <path> if is necessary.
Also introduce new ARC migration functions in libclang whose only purpose,
currently, is to accept <path> and provide pairs of original file/transformed file
to map from the originals to the files after transformations are applied.
Finally introduce the c-arcmt-test utility that exercises the new libclang functions,
update arcmt-test, and add tests for the whole process.
rdar://9735086.
llvm-svn: 134844
This tool will be the test bed for indexing related operations. It basically reads PCH files passed by the command line and performs various operations.
Currently it can accept a file:line:column which resolves to a declaration/statement and displays some information about them.
llvm-svn: 74198
Rafael Stahl