In some cases the library call simplifier may need to replace instructions
other than the library call being simplified. In those cases it may be
necessary for clients of the simplifier to override how the replacements
are actually done. As such, a new overrideable method for replacing
instructions was added to LibCallSimplifier.
A new subclass of LibCallSimplifier is also defined which overrides
the instruction replacement method. This is because the instruction
combiner defines its own replacement method which updates the worklist
when instructions are replaced.
llvm-svn: 167681
GCD queue names of threads to
ProcessGDBRemote::GetDispatchQueueNameForThread()
May need tweaking once this version is rolled out but visual
inspection looks fine.
<rdar://problem/12333100>
llvm-svn: 167667
- New options '-mrtm'/'-mno-rtm' are added to enable/disable RTM feature
- Builtin macro '__RTM__' is defined if RTM feature is enabled
- RTM intrinsic header is added and introduces 3 new intrinsics, namely
'_xbegin', '_xend', and '_xabort'.
- 3 new builtins are added to keep compatible with gcc, namely
'__builtin_ia32_xbegin', '__builtin_ia32_xend', and '__builtin_ia32_xabort'.
- Test cases for pre-defined macro and new intrinsic codegen are added.
llvm-svn: 167665
Several of the simplifiers migrated from the simplify-libcalls pass to
the instcombine pass were not correctly checking the target library
information to gate the simplifications. This patch ensures that the
check is made.
llvm-svn: 167660
In the process of migrating optimizations from the simplify-libcalls pass
to the instcombine pass I noticed that a few functions are missing from
the target library information. These functions need to be available for
querying in the instcombine library call simplifiers. More functions will
probably be added in the future as more simplifiers are migrated to
instcombine.
llvm-svn: 167659
mov lr, pc
b.w _foo
The "mov" instruction doesn't set bit zero to one, it's putting incorrect
value in lr. It messes up backtraces.
rdar://12663632
llvm-svn: 167657
The rationale is that there is no good workflow to silence the warning
for specific cases, other than using pragmas. This is because the
attribute to decorate an explicit fall through is only available
in C++11.
By that argument, this should probably also be disabled unless one
is using C++11, but apparently there is an explicit test case for
this warning when using C++98. This will require further discussion
on cfe-commits.
Fixes: <rdar://problem/12584746>
llvm-svn: 167655
Previously, RegionStore was being VERY conservative in saying that because
p[i].x and p[i].y have a concrete base region of 'p', they might overlap.
Now, we check the chain of fields back up to the base object and check if
they match.
This only kicks in when dealing with symbolic offset regions because
RegionStore's "base+offset" representation of concrete offset regions loses
all information about fields. In cases where all offsets are concrete
(s.x and s.y), RegionStore will already do the right thing, but mixing
concrete and symbolic offsets can cause bindings to be invalidated that
are known to not overlap (e.g. p[0].x and p[i].y).
This additional refinement is tracked by <rdar://problem/12676180>.
<rdar://problem/12530149>
llvm-svn: 167654
would have diagnosed this at instantiation time anyway, if only we
didn't hang on all of these test cases. Fixes <rdar://problem/12629723>
llvm-svn: 167651
C++11 3.3.3/2 "A parameter name shall not be redeclared in the outermost block
of the function definition nor in the outermost block of any handler associated
with a function-try-block."
It's not totally clear to me whether the "FIXME" case is covered by this, but
Richard Smith thinks it probably should be. It's just a bit more involved to
fix that case.
llvm-svn: 167650
This warning was failing to fire under ARC because of the implicit
lifetime casts added around the object literal expression.
<rdar://problem/11300873>, again.
llvm-svn: 167648
Meador Inge