Commit Graph

5869 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Davide Italiano 6f93df8105 [Analysis/CallGraph] Switch dump() definitions over to LLVM_DUMP_METHOD.
llvm-svn: 253842
2015-11-23 02:58:42 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 0194743fad [SCEV] Use C++11'isms
llvm-svn: 253837
2015-11-22 21:20:13 +00:00
Sanjoy Das b37c4c414b [SCEVExpander] Use C++isms; NFC
llvm-svn: 253801
2015-11-21 23:20:10 +00:00
Rong Xu a1f61fe841 Add some constantness to GetSuccessorNumber().
llvm-svn: 253733
2015-11-20 23:02:06 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne c85f4ced4d ScalarEvolution: do not set nuw when creating exprs of form <expr> + <all-ones>.
The nuw constraint will not be satisfied unless <expr> == 0.

This bug has been around since r102234 (in 2010!), but was uncovered by
r251052, which introduced more aggressive optimization of nuw scev expressions.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14850

llvm-svn: 253627
2015-11-20 01:26:13 +00:00
Pete Cooper 67cf9a723b Revert "Change memcpy/memset/memmove to have dest and source alignments."
This reverts commit r253511.

This likely broke the bots in
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64-elf-linux2/builds/20202
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-3stage-i686-linux/builds/3787

llvm-svn: 253543
2015-11-19 05:56:52 +00:00
Pete Cooper 72bc23ef02 Change memcpy/memset/memmove to have dest and source alignments.
Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html

These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer.  It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.

This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments.  The alignment
argument itself is removed.

There are a few places in the code for which the code needs to be
checked by an expert as to whether using only src/dest alignment is
safe.  For those places, they currently take the minimum of src/dest
alignments which matches the current behaviour.

For example, code which used to read:
  call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 500, i32 8, i1 false)
will now read:
  call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 8 %dest, i8* align 8 %src, i32 500, i1 false)

For out of tree owners, I was able to strip alignment from calls using sed by replacing:
  (call.*llvm\.memset.*)i32\ [0-9]*\,\ i1 false\)
with:
  $1i1 false)

and similarly for memmove and memcpy.

I then added back in alignment to test cases which needed it.

A similar commit will be made to clang which actually has many differences in alignment as now
IRBuilder can generate different source/dest alignments on calls.

In IRBuilder itself, a new argument was added.  Instead of calling:
  CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
you now call
  CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, SrcAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)

There is a temporary class (IntegerAlignment) which takes the source alignment and rejects
implicit conversion from bool.  This is to prevent isVolatile here from passing its default
parameter to the source alignment.

Note, changes in future can now be made to codegen.  I didn't change anything here, but this
change should enable better memcpy code sequences.

Reviewed by Hal Finkel.

llvm-svn: 253511
2015-11-18 22:17:24 +00:00
Igor Laevsky 7310c68e85 Revert "Revert "Strip metadata when speculatively hoisting instructions (r252604)"
Failing clang test is now fixed by the r253458.

llvm-svn: 253459
2015-11-18 14:50:18 +00:00
Rafael Espindola 55512f9b25 Default SetVector to use a DenseSet.
We use to have an odd difference among MapVector and SetVector. The map
used a DenseMop, but the set used a SmallSet, which in turn uses a
std::set.

I have changed SetVector to use a DenseSet. If you were depending on the
old behaviour you can pass an explicit set type or use SmallSetVector.
The common cases for needing to do it are:

* Optimizing for small sets.
* Sets for types not supported by DenseSet.

llvm-svn: 253439
2015-11-18 06:52:18 +00:00
George Burgess IV 2ae15e0609 Specify explicit storage type for AllocType. NFC.
llvm-svn: 253366
2015-11-17 19:48:06 +00:00
David Majnemer 6727c015dc [AliasAnalysis] CatchPad and CatchRet can modify escaped memory
CatchPad and CatchRet behave a lot like function calls: they can
potentially modify any memory which has been escaped.

llvm-svn: 253323
2015-11-17 08:15:14 +00:00
David Majnemer 0345b0fa9e Fix a typo in BasicAliasAnalysis
llvm-svn: 253322
2015-11-17 08:15:08 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer 83709b1c1e Move helper classes into anonymous namespaces. NFC.
llvm-svn: 253189
2015-11-16 09:01:28 +00:00
Akira Hatanaka 5af7ace4ee Revert r252990.
Some of the buildbots are still failing.

llvm-svn: 252999
2015-11-13 01:44:32 +00:00
Akira Hatanaka c7dfb76fe7 Provide a way to specify inliner's attribute compatibility and merging.
This reapplies r252949. I've changed the type of FuncName to be
std::string instead of StringRef in emitFnAttrCompatCheck.

Original commit message for r252949:

Provide a way to specify inliner's attribute compatibility and merging
rules using table-gen. NFC.

This commit adds new classes CompatRule and MergeRule to Attributes.td,
which are used to generate code to check attribute compatibility and
merge attributes of the caller and callee.

rdar://problem/19836465

llvm-svn: 252990
2015-11-13 01:23:11 +00:00
Akira Hatanaka f3aa82f666 Revert r252949.
It broke some of the bots including clang-x64-ninja-win7.

llvm-svn: 252951
2015-11-12 21:19:18 +00:00
Akira Hatanaka 61b81a563a Provide a way to specify inliner's attribute compatibility and merging
rules using table-gen. NFC.

This commit adds new classes CompatRule and MergeRule to Attributes.td,
which are used to generate code to check attribute compatibility and
merge attributes of the caller and callee.

rdar://problem/19836465

llvm-svn: 252949
2015-11-12 20:59:43 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 53da2fe729 Revert r243347 "Add TargetTransformInfo::isZExtFree."
r243347 was intended to support a change to LSR (r243348).  That change
to LSR has since had to be reverted (r243939) because it was buggy, and
now the code added in r243347 is untested and unexercised.  Given that,
I think it is appropriate to revert r243347 for now, with the intent of
adding it back in later if I get around to checking in a fixed version
of r243348.

llvm-svn: 252948
2015-11-12 20:51:52 +00:00
Sanjoy Das dc26df4abe [ValueTracking] Remove untested / unreachable code, NFC
Right now isTruePredicate is only ever called with Pred == ICMP_SLE or
ICMP_ULE, and the ICMP_SLT and ICMP_ULT cases are dead.  This change
removes the untested dead code so that the function is not misleading.

llvm-svn: 252676
2015-11-11 00:16:41 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 925681053d [ValueTracking] Teach isImpliedCondition a new bitwise trick
Summary:
This change teaches isImpliedCondition to prove things like

  (A | 15) < L  ==>  (A | 14) < L

if the low 4 bits of A are known to be zero.

Depends on D14391

Reviewers: majnemer, reames, hfinkel

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14392

llvm-svn: 252673
2015-11-10 23:56:20 +00:00
Sanjoy Das af1400f84b [ValueTracking] Use m_APInt instead of m_ConstantInt, NFC
This change would add functionality if isImpliedCondition worked on
vector types; but since it bail out on vector predicates this change is
an NFC.

llvm-svn: 252672
2015-11-10 23:56:15 +00:00
Philip Reames 2d858747df [ValueTracking] Recognize that and(x, add (x, -1)) clears the low bit
This is a cleaned up version of a patch by John Regehr with permission. Originally found via the souper tool.

If we add an odd number to x, then bitwise-and the result with x, we know that the low bit of the result must be zero. Either it was zero in x originally, or the add cleared it in the temporary value. As a result, one of the two values anded together must have the bit cleared.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14315

llvm-svn: 252629
2015-11-10 18:46:14 +00:00
Renato Golin 0e77d72b0a Revert "Strip metadata when speculatively hoisting instructions"
This reverts commit r252604, as it broke all ARM and AArch64 buildbots, as
well as some x86, et al.

llvm-svn: 252623
2015-11-10 18:01:16 +00:00
Igor Laevsky 01c3692a10 Strip metadata when speculatively hoisting instructions
This is fix for PR24059.

When we are hoisting instruction above some condition it may turn out
that metadata on this instruction was control dependant on the condition.
This metadata becomes invalid and we need to drop it.

This patch should cover most obvious places of speculative execution (which
I have found by greping isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute). I think there are more
cases but at least this change covers the severe ones.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14398

llvm-svn: 252604
2015-11-10 14:10:31 +00:00
Hans Wennborg 21ce8ecb09 Inliner: Do zero-cost inlines even if above a negative threshold (PR24851)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14499

llvm-svn: 252595
2015-11-10 09:47:48 +00:00
Davide Italiano bfd3082e85 [TargetLibraryInfo] Add support for fls, flsl, flsll.
This is a prerequisite for further optimisations of these functions,
which will be commited as a separate patch.

Differential Revision:	http://reviews.llvm.org/D14219

llvm-svn: 252535
2015-11-09 23:23:20 +00:00
James Molloy 45f67d52d0 [LoopVectorize] Address post-commit feedback on r250032
Implemented as many of Michael's suggestions as were possible:
  * clang-format the added code while it is still fresh.
  * tried to change Value* to Instruction* in many places in computeMinimumValueSizes - unfortunately there are several places where Constants need to be handled so this wasn't possible.
  * Reduce the pass list on loop-vectorization-factors.ll.
  * Fix a bug where we were querying MinBWs for I->getOperand(0) but using MinBWs[I].

llvm-svn: 252469
2015-11-09 14:32:05 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith 83c4b68720 ADT: Remove last implicit ilist iterator conversions, NFC
Some implicit ilist iterator conversions have crept back into Analysis,
Transforms, Hexagon, and llvm-stress.  This removes them.

I'll commit a patch immediately after this to disallow them (in a
separate patch so that it's easy to revert if necessary).

llvm-svn: 252371
2015-11-07 00:01:16 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 55ea67cea7 [ValueTracking] Add parameters to isImpliedCondition; NFC
Summary:
This change makes the `isImpliedCondition` interface similar to the rest
of the functions in ValueTracking (in that it takes a DataLayout,
AssumptionCache etc.).  This is an NFC, intended to make a later diff
less noisy.

Depends on D14369

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14391

llvm-svn: 252333
2015-11-06 19:01:08 +00:00
Sanjoy Das c01b4d2b28 [ValueTracking] De-pessimize isImpliedCondition around unsigned compares
Summary:
Currently `isImpliedCondition` will optimize "I +_nuw C < L ==> I < L"
only if C is positive.  This is an unnecessary restriction -- the
implication holds even if `C` is negative.

Reviewers: reames, majnemer

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14369

llvm-svn: 252332
2015-11-06 19:01:03 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 9349dcc74a [ValueTracking] Add a framework for encoding implication rules
Summary:
This change adds a framework for adding more smarts to
`isImpliedCondition` around inequalities.  Informally,
`isImpliedCondition` will now try to prove "A < B ==> C < D" by proving
"C <= A && B <= D", since then it follows "C <= A < B <= D".

While this change is in principle NFC, I could not think of a way to not
handle cases like "i +_nsw 1 < L ==> i < L +_nsw 1" (that ValueTracking
did not handle before) while keeping the change understandable.  I've
added tests for these cases.

Reviewers: reames, majnemer, hfinkel

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14368

llvm-svn: 252331
2015-11-06 19:00:57 +00:00
Sanjoy Das c1a2977fb2 Re-apply r251050 with a for PR25421
The bug: I missed adding break statements in the switch / case.

Original commit message:

[SCEV] Teach SCEV some axioms about non-wrapping arithmetic

Summary:
 - A s<  (A + C)<nsw> if C >  0
 - A s<= (A + C)<nsw> if C >= 0
 - (A + C)<nsw> s<  A if C <  0
 - (A + C)<nsw> s<= A if C <= 0

Right now `C` needs to be a constant, but we can later generalize it to
be a non-constant if needed.

Reviewers: atrick, hfinkel, reames, nlewycky

Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13686

llvm-svn: 252236
2015-11-05 23:45:38 +00:00
Richard Trieu f8978e1a74 Revert r251050 to fix miscompile when running Clang -O1
See bug for details: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25421
Some comparisons were incorrectly replaced with a constant value.

llvm-svn: 252231
2015-11-05 23:20:36 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko 484e48e3a3 Refactor: Simplify boolean conditional return statements in llvm/lib/Analysis
Patch by Richard Thomson!

Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9967

llvm-svn: 252209
2015-11-05 21:07:12 +00:00
Mehdi Amini afd135197b Fix LoopAccessAnalysis when potentially nullptr check are involved
Summary:
GetUnderlyingObjects() can return "null" among its list of objects,
we don't want to deduce that two pointers can point to the same
memory in this case, so filter it out.

Reviewers: anemet

Subscribers: dexonsmith, llvm-commits

From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 252149
2015-11-05 05:49:43 +00:00
Sanjoy Das ea34382dfa [CaptureTracking] Support operand bundles conservatively
Summary:
Earlier CaptureTracking would assume all "interesting" operands to a
call or invoke were its arguments.  With operand bundles this is no
longer true.

Note: an earlier change got `doesNotCapture` working correctly with
operand bundles.

This change uses DSE to test the changes to CaptureTracking.  DSE is a
vehicle for testing only, and is not directly involved in this change.

Reviewers: reames, majnemer

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14306

llvm-svn: 252095
2015-11-04 23:21:06 +00:00
Justin Bogner c2b98f03db PM: Rephrase PrintLoopPass as a wrapper around a new-style pass. NFC
Splits PrintLoopPass into a new-style pass and a PrintLoopPassWrapper,
much like we already do for PrintFunctionPass and PrintModulePass.

llvm-svn: 252085
2015-11-04 22:24:08 +00:00
Philip Reames aeefae0cc5 [LVI] Update a comment to clarify what's actually happening and why
llvm-svn: 252033
2015-11-04 01:47:04 +00:00
Adam Nemet 397f5829c7 [LAA] LLE 5/6: Add predicate functions Dependence::isForward/isBackward, NFC
Summary: Will be used by the LoopLoadElimination pass.

Reviewers: hfinkel

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13258

llvm-svn: 252016
2015-11-03 23:50:03 +00:00
Adam Nemet a2df750fb3 [LAA] LLE 3/6: Rename InterestingDependence to Dependences, NFC
Summary:
We now collect all types of dependences including lexically forward
deps not just "interesting" ones.

Reviewers: hfinkel

Subscribers: rengolin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13256

llvm-svn: 251985
2015-11-03 21:39:52 +00:00
Adam Nemet d7037c56d3 [LAA] LLE 2/6: Fix a NoDep case that should be a Forward dependence
Summary:
When the dependence distance in zero then we have a loop-independent
dependence from the earlier to the later access.

No current client of LAA uses forward dependences so other than
potentially hitting the MaxDependences threshold earlier, this change
shouldn't affect anything right now.

This and the previous patch were tested together for compile-time
regression.  None found in LNT/SPEC.

Reviewers: hfinkel

Subscribers: rengolin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13255

llvm-svn: 251973
2015-11-03 20:13:43 +00:00
Adam Nemet b45516e875 [LAA] LLE 1/6: Expose Forward dependences
Summary:
Before this change, we didn't use to collect forward dependences since
none of the current clients (LV, LDist) required them.

The motivation to also collect forward dependences is a new pass
LoopLoadElimination (LLE) which discovers store-to-load forwarding
opportunities across the loop's backedge.  The pass uses both lexically
forward or backward loop-carried dependences to detect these
opportunities.

The new pass also analyzes loop-independent (forward) dependences since
they can conflict with the loop-carried dependences in terms of how the
data flows through memory.

The newly added test only covers loop-carried forward dependences
because loop-independent ones are currently categorized as NoDep.  The
next patch will fix this.

The two patches were tested together for compile-time regression.  None
found in LNT/SPEC.

Note that with this change LAA provides all dependences rather than just
"interesting" ones.  A subsequent NFC patch will remove the now trivial
isInterestingDependence and rename the APIs.

Reviewers: hfinkel

Subscribers: jmolloy, rengolin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13254

llvm-svn: 251972
2015-11-03 20:13:23 +00:00
Silviu Baranga 308a7c7ed4 Fix PR25372 - teach replaceCongruentPHIs to handle cases where SE evaluates a PHI to a SCEVConstant
Summary:
Since now Scalar Evolution can create non-add rec expressions for PHI
nodes, it can also create SCEVConstant expressions. This will confuse
replaceCongruentPHIs, which previously relied on the fact that SCEV
could not produce constants in this case.

We will now replace the node with a constant in these cases - or avoid
processing the Phi in case of a type mismatch.

Reviewers: sanjoy

Subscribers: llvm-commits, majnemer

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14230

llvm-svn: 251938
2015-11-03 16:27:04 +00:00
Tim Northover 89a6eefe6f TvOS: add missing support for some libcalls.
llvm-svn: 251811
2015-11-02 18:00:00 +00:00
Silviu Baranga e3c0534b11 [SCEV][LV] Add SCEV Predicates and use them to re-implement stride versioning
Summary:
SCEV Predicates represent conditions that typically cannot be derived from
static analysis, but can be used to reduce SCEV expressions to forms which are
usable for different optimizers.

ScalarEvolution now has the rewriteUsingPredicate method which can simplify a
SCEV expression using a SCEVPredicateSet. The normal workflow of a pass using
SCEVPredicates would be to hold a SCEVPredicateSet and every time assumptions
need to be made a new SCEV Predicate would be created and added to the set.
Each time after calling getSCEV, the user will call the rewriteUsingPredicate
method.

We add two types of predicates
SCEVPredicateSet - implements a set of predicates
SCEVEqualPredicate - tests for equality between two SCEV expressions

We use the SCEVEqualPredicate to re-implement stride versioning. Every time we
version a stride, we will add a SCEVEqualPredicate to the context.
Instead of adding specific stride checks, LoopVectorize now adds a more
generic SCEV check.

We only need to add support for this in the LoopVectorizer since this is the
only pass that will do stride versioning.

Reviewers: mzolotukhin, anemet, hfinkel, sanjoy

Subscribers: sanjoy, hfinkel, rengolin, jmolloy, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13595

llvm-svn: 251800
2015-11-02 14:41:02 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 52bfa0faa4 [SCEV] Fix PR25369
Have `getConstantEvolutionLoopExitValue` work correctly with multiple
entry loops.

As far as I can tell, `getConstantEvolutionLoopExitValue` never did the
right thing for multiple entry loops; and before r249712 it would
silently return an incorrect answer.  r249712 changed SCEV to fail an
assert on a multiple entry loop, and this change fixes the underlying
issue.

llvm-svn: 251770
2015-11-02 02:06:01 +00:00
Davide Italiano 83b3481601 [LibraryInfo] Point to FreeBSD HEAD repo and not to a dolphin branch.
The latter might go away (anytime soon).

llvm-svn: 251765
2015-11-01 17:00:13 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 337d4786e1 [SCEV] Don't create SCEV expressions that break LCSSA
Prevent `createNodeFromSelectLikePHI` from creating SCEV expressions
that break LCSSA.

A better fix for the same issue is to teach SCEVExpander to not break
LCSSA by inserting PHI nodes at appropriate places.  That's planned for
the future.

Fixes PR25360.

llvm-svn: 251756
2015-10-31 23:21:40 +00:00
Sanjoy Das f25d25a156 [SCEV] Use auto and range for; NFC
llvm-svn: 251755
2015-10-31 23:21:32 +00:00
Silviu Baranga f91c80720d [SCEV] Generalize the SCEV algorithm for creating expressions for PHI nodes
Summary:
When forming expressions for phi nodes having an incoming value from
outside the loop A and a value coming from the previous iteration B
we were forming an AddRec if:
  - B was an AddRec
  - the value A was equal to the value for B at iteration -1 (or equal
    to the value of B shifted by one iteration, at iteration 0)

In this case, we were computing the expression to be the expression of
B, shifted by one iteration.

This changes generalizes the logic above by removing the restriction that
B needs to be an AddRec. For this we introduce two expression rewriters
that allow us to
  - shift an expression by one iteration
  - get the value of an expression at iteration 0

This allows us to get SCEV expressions for PHI nodes when these expressions
are not AddRecExprs.

Reviewers: sanjoy

Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14175

llvm-svn: 251700
2015-10-30 15:02:28 +00:00