Currently, `hasUnaryOperand` fails for the overloaded `operator*`. This patch fixes the bug and
adds tests for this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104389
This implements the 'using enum maybe-qualified-enum-tag ;' part of
1099. It introduces a new 'UsingEnumDecl', subclassed from
'BaseUsingDecl'. Much of the diff is the boilerplate needed to get the
new class set up.
There is one case where we accept ill-formed, but I believe this is
merely an extended case of an existing bug, so consider it
orthogonal. AFAICT in class-scope the c++20 rule is that no 2 using
decls can bring in the same target decl ([namespace.udecl]/8). But we
already accept:
struct A { enum { a }; };
struct B : A { using A::a; };
struct C : B { using A::a;
using B::a; }; // same enumerator
this patch permits mixtures of 'using enum Bob;' and 'using Bob::member;' in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102241
This patch adds support for matching gtest's ASSERT_THAT, EXPECT_THAT, ON_CALL and EXPECT_CALL macros.
Reviewed By: ymandel, hokein
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103195
The new matcher additionally covers blocks and Objective-C methods.
This matcher actually makes sure that the statement truly belongs
to that declaration's body. forFunction() incorrectly reported that
a statement in a nested block belonged to the surrounding function.
forFunction() is now deprecated due to the above footgun, in favor of
forCallable(functionDecl()) when only functions need to be considered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102213
Required for capturing base specifier in matchers:
`cxxRecordDecl(hasDirectBase(cxxBaseSpecifier().bind("base")))`
Reviewed By: steveire, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69218
Summary: Try to enable the support for C++20 coroutine keywords for AST
Matchers.
Reviewers: sammccall, njames93, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96316
This reverts commit 6984e0d439.
While change by itself seems to be consistent with nullPointerConstant
docs of not matching "int i = 0;" but it's not clear why it's wrong and
9148302a2a author just forgot to update
the doc.
This reverts commit 9148302a (2019-08-22) which broke the pre-existing
unit test for the matcher. Also revert commit 518b2266 (Fix the
nullPointerConstant() test to get bots back to green., 2019-08-22) which
incorrectly changed the test to expect the broken behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96665
For example, before this patch we can use has() to get from a
cxxRewrittenBinaryOperator to its operand, but hasParent doesn't get
back to the cxxRewrittenBinaryOperator. This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96113
With a matcher like
expr(anyOf(integerLiteral(equals(42)), unless(expr())))
and code such as
struct B {
B(int);
};
B func1() { return 42; }
the top-level expr() would match each of the nodes which are not spelled
in the source and then ignore-traverse to match the integerLiteral node.
This would result in multiple results reported for the integerLiteral.
Fix that by only running matching logic on nodes which are not skipped
with the top-level matcher.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95735
Add an operator overload to ArgumentAdaptingMatcherFunc to allow use of
mapAnyOf within hasAncestor, hasParent etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94864
This is a simple utility which allows matching on binaryOperator and
cxxOperatorCallExpr. It can also be extended to support
cxxRewrittenBinaryOperator.
Add generic support for MapAnyOfMatchers to auto-marshalling functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94129
Make it possible to compose a matcher for different base nodes.
This accepts one or more node matcher functors and zero or more
matchers, composing the latter into the former.
This allows composing of matchers where the same inner matcher name is
used for the same concept, but with a different node functor. Currently,
there is a limitation that the nodes must be in the same "clade", so
while
mapAnyOf(ifStmt, forStmt).with(hasBody(stmt()))
can be used, functionDecl can not be added to the tuple.
It is possible to use this in clang-query, but it will require changes
to the QueryParser, so is deferred to a future review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94127
Because we don't know in ASTMatchFinder whether we're matching in AsIs
or IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource mode, we need to traverse the lambda
twice, but store whether we're matching in nodes spelled in source or
not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93688
This allows ASTs to be merged when they contain GenericSelectionExpr
nodes (this is _Generic from C11). This is needed, for example, for
CTU analysis of C code that makes use of _Generic, like the Linux
kernel.
The node is already supported in the AST, but it didn't have a matcher
in ASTMatchers. So, this change adds the matcher and adds support to
ASTImporter. Additionally, this change adds support for structural
equivalence of _Generic in the AST.
Reviewed By: martong, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92600
traverse() predates the IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource mode. Update example
and test code to use the newer mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91917
Don't match Stmt or Decl nodes not spelled in the source when using
TK_IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource. This prevents accidental modification
of source code at incorrect locations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90984
Update the ASTNodeTraverser to dump only nodes spelled in source. There
are only a few which need to be handled, but Decl nodes for which
isImplicit() is true are handled together.
Update the RAV instances used in ASTMatchFinder to ignore the nodes too.
As with handling of template instantiations, it is necessary to allow
the RAV to process the implicit nodes because they need to be visitable
before the first traverse() matcher is encountered. An exception to
this is in the MatchChildASTVisitor, because we sometimes wish to make a
node matchable but make its children not-matchable. This is the case
for defaulted CXXMethodDecls for example.
Extend TransformerTests to illustrate the kinds of problems that can
arise when performing source code rewriting due to matching implicit
nodes.
This change accounts for handling nodes not spelled in source when using
direct matching of nodes, and when using the has() and hasDescendant()
matchers. Other matchers such as
cxxRecordDecl(hasMethod(cxxMethodDecl())) still succeed for
compiler-generated methods for example after this change. Updating the
implementations of hasMethod() and other matchers is for a follow-up
patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90982
Continue to dump and match on explicit template specializations, but
omit explicit instantiation declarations and definitions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90763
Sam McCall