Summary:
Noticed this when I tried to port the Protocol.h parsers.
And tests for the inspect API, which caught a small bug.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40399
llvm-svn: 319157
Summary:
This will replace the places where we're using YAMLParser to parse JSON now:
- the new marshalling code (T::parse()) should handle fewer cases and require
fewer explicit casts
- we'll early-reject invalid JSON that YAMLParser accepts
- we'll be able to fix protocol-parsing bugs caused by the fact that YAML can
only parse forward
I plan to do the conversion as soon as this lands, but I don't want it in one
patch as the protocol.cpp changes are conflict-prone.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40182
llvm-svn: 318774
Summary:
This form can be created with a nice clang-format-friendly literal syntax,
and gets escaping right. It knows how to call unparse() on our Protocol types.
All the places where we pass around JSON internally now use this type.
Object properties are sorted (stored as std::map) and so serialization is
canonicalized, with optional prettyprinting (triggered by a -pretty flag).
This makes the lit tests much nicer to read and somewhat nicer to debug.
(Unfortunately the completion tests use CHECK-DAG, which only has
line-granularity, so pretty-printing is disabled there. In future we
could make completion ordering deterministic, or switch to unittests).
Compared to the current approach, it has some efficiencies like avoiding copies
of string literals used as object keys, but is probably slower overall.
I think the code/test quality benefits are worth it.
This patch doesn't attempt to do anything about JSON *parsing*.
It takes direction from the proposal in this doc[1], but is limited in scope
and visibility, for now.
I am of half a mind just to use Expr as the target of a parser, and maybe do a
little string deduplication, but not bother with clever memory allocation.
That would be simple, and fast enough for clangd...
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OEF9IauWwNuSigZzvvbjc1cVS1uGHRyGTXaoy3DjqM4/edit
+cc d0k so he can tell me not to use std::map.
Reviewers: ioeric, malaperle
Subscribers: bkramer, ilya-biryukov, mgorny, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39435
llvm-svn: 317486
Eric Liu