These instructions can set the exception in FPSW. But I
don't think they can change FPCW. So this looks like a typo.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73864
Summary:
I think whatever problem the gluing was fixing has long since been fixed. We don't have any of the restrictions on FP stack stuff that existed back when this was first added.
I had to change which type we use for FILD in BuildFILD when X86 was enabled because most of the isel patterns block f32/f64 instructions when SSE1/SSE2 are enabled. So I needed to use the f80 pattern, but this shouldn't have an effect the generated code since there is only one FILD instruction anyway. We already use f80 explicitly in other other places.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: andrew.w.kaylor, scanon, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72805
float-point exception.
This patch also modify some mayRaiseFPException flag which set in D68854.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72750
We use the stack for X87 fp_round and for moving from SSE f32/f64 to
X87 f64/f80. Or from X87 f64/f80 to SSE f32/f64.
Note for the SSE<->X87 conversions the conversion always happens in the
X87 domain. The load/store ops in the X87 instructions are able
to signal exceptions.
Summary: This is a follow up of D69281, it enables the X86 backend support for the FP comparision.
Reviewers: uweigand, kpn, craig.topper, RKSimon, cameron.mcinally, andrew.w.kaylor
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, annita.zhang, LuoYuanke, LiuChen3
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70582
This is the following patch of D68854.
This patch adds basic operations of X87 instructions, including +, -, *, / , fp extensions and fp truncations.
Patch by Chen Liu(LiuChen3)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68857
This patch adds flag "mayRaiseFPException" , FPCW and FPSW for X87 instructions which could raise
float exception.
Patch by LiuChen. With a couple small fixes from me.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68854
With correct test checks this time.
If we have X87, but not SSE2 we can atomicaly load an i64 value into the significand of an 80-bit extended precision x87 register using fild. We can then use a fist instruction to convert it back to an i64 integ
This matches what gcc and icc do for this case and removes an existing FIXME.
llvm-svn: 358214
If we have X87, but not SSE2 we can atomicaly load an i64 value into the significand of an 80-bit extended precision x87 register using fild. We can then use a fist instruction to convert it back to an i64 integer and store it to a stack temporary. From there we can do two 32-bit loads to get the value into integer registers without worrying about atomicness.
This matches what gcc and icc do for this case and removes an existing FIXME.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60156
llvm-svn: 358211
This was done in r321424 to prevent scheduling from reordering things. But now that we model FPCW as a dependency, I don't think the same scheduling we were trying to prevent can occur.
llvm-svn: 354628
After r354178, these instruction expand to a sequence that uses an OR instruction. That OR clobbers EFLAGS so we need to state that to avoid accidentally using the clobbered flags.
Our tests show the bug, but I didn't notice because the SETcc instructions didn't move after r354178 since it used to be safe to do the fp->int conversion first.
We should probably convert this whole sequence to SelectionDAG instead of a custom inserter to avoid mistakes like this.
Fixes PR40779
llvm-svn: 354395
Summary: These instructions update FPSW so they aren't generically safe to rematerialize into any location if FPSW is live for a comparison result. They also use FPCW for exception masking control. Though the only exception they can generate is stack overflow and we manage the stack ourselves so that's not really going to occur.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57934
llvm-svn: 353536
Summary:
FPCW contains the rounding mode control which we manipulate to implement fp to integer conversion by changing the roudning mode, storing the value to the stack, and then changing the rounding mode back. Because we didn't model FPCW and its dependency chain, other instructions could be scheduled into the middle of the sequence.
This patch introduces the register and adds it as an implciit def of FLDCW and implicit use of the FP binary arithmetic instructions and store instructions. There are more instructions that need to be updated, but this is a good start. I believe this fixes at least the reduced test case from PR40529.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, rnk, efriedma, andrew.w.kaylor
Subscribers: dim, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57735
llvm-svn: 353489
All of these instructions consume one encoded register and the other register is %st. They either write the result to %st or the encoded register. Previously we printed both arguments when the encoded register was written. And we printed one argument when the result was written to %st. For the stack popping forms the encoded register is always the destination and we didn't print both operands. This was inconsistent with gcc and objdump and just makes the output assembly code harder to read.
This patch changes things to always print both operands making us consistent with gcc and objdump. The parser should still be able to handle the single register forms just as it did before. This also matches the GNU assembler behavior.
llvm-svn: 353061
Looking into gcc and objdump behavior more this was overly aggressive. If the register is encoded in the instruction we should print %st(0), if its implicit we should print %st.
I'll be making a more directed change in a future patch.
llvm-svn: 353013
Summary:
When calculating clobbers for MS style inline assembly we fail if the asm clobbers stack top because we print st(0) and try to pass it through the gcc register name check. This was found with when I attempted to make a emms/femms clobber all ST registers. If you use emms/femms in MS inline asm we would try to use st(0) as the clobber name but clang would think that wasn't a valid clobber name.
This also matches what objdump disassembly prints. It's also what is printed by gcc -S.
Reviewers: RKSimon, rnk, efriedma, spatel, andreadb, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: eraman, gbedwell, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57621
llvm-svn: 352985
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
These instructions were added on the PentiumPro along with CMOV.
This was already comprehended by the lowering process which should emit an alternate sequence using FCOM and FNSTW. This just makes it an explicit error if that doesn't work for some reason.
llvm-svn: 340844
Summary:
{FLDL2E, FLDL2T, FLDLG2, FLDLN2, FLDPI} were using WriteMicrocoded.
- I've measured the values for Broadwell, Haswell, SandyBridge, Skylake.
- For ZnVer1 and Atom, values were transferred form InstRWs.
- For SLM and BtVer2, I've guessed some values :(
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, andreadb
Subscribers: gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47585
llvm-svn: 333656
Summary:
- I've measured the values for Broadwell, Haswell, SandyBridge, Skylake.
- For ZnVer1 and Atom, values were transferred form `InstRW`s.
- For SLM and BtVer2, values are from Agner.
This is split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D47377
Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb
Subscribers: gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47523
llvm-svn: 333642
WriteFRcp/WriteFRsqrt are split to support scalar, XMM and YMM/ZMM instructions.
WriteFSqrt is split into single/double/long-double sizes and scalar, XMM, YMM and ZMM instructions.
This removes all InstrRW overrides for these instructions.
NOTE: There were a couple of typos in the Znver1 model - notably a 1cy throughput for SQRT that is highly unlikely and doesn't tally with Agner.
NOTE: I had to add Agner's numbers for several targets for WriteFSqrt80.
llvm-svn: 331629
Previously for instructions like fxsave we would print "opaque ptr" as part of the memory operand. Now we print nothing.
We also no longer accept "opaque ptr" in the parser. We still accept any size to be specified for these instructions, but we may want to consider only parsing when no explicit size is specified. This what gas does.
llvm-svn: 331243
Split the fp and integer vector logical instruction scheduler classes - older CPUs especially often handled these on different pipes.
This unearthed a couple of things that are also handled in this patch:
(1) We were tagging avx512 fp logic ops as WriteFAdd, probably because of the lack of WriteFLogic
(2) SandyBridge had integer logic ops only using Port5, when afaict they can use Ports015.
(3) Cleaned up x86 FCHS/FABS scheduling as they are typically treated as fp logic ops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45629
llvm-svn: 330480
Split VCMP/VMAX/VMIN instructions off to WriteFCmp and VCOMIS instructions off to WriteFCom instead of assuming they match WriteFAdd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45656
llvm-svn: 330179
1. Given that we already have a classification bucket with 'nop' in the name,
that's where 'nop' belongs. Right now, it's only used for prefix bytes and 'pause'.
2. Make the latency of this class '1' for Jaguar to tell the scheduler (and presumably
llvm-mca) how to model the resource requirements better even though a nop has no
dependencies.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44608
llvm-svn: 327853
Match regular x87 memory fold instructions with load/sideeffects tags, to prevent the schedulers from re-ordering them across the fnstcw/fldcw sequences for truncating stores while they are still pseudo during the stack conversion pass.
llvm-svn: 321424
There was a top level "let Predicates =" in the .td file that was overriding the Requires on each instruction.
I've added an assert to the code emitter to catch more cases like this. I'm sure this isn't the only place where the right predicates aren't being applied. This assert already found that we don't block btq/btsq/btrq in 32-bit mode.
llvm-svn: 320830
Looking through Agner, FTST is very similar to generic float compare behaviour, so I've added them to the existing IIC_FCOMI (WriteFAdd) tags.
llvm-svn: 319184
Atom's FABS/FCHS/FSQRT latencies taken from Agner.
Note: I just added FSIN and FCOS to the existing IIC_FSINCOS itinerary, which is actually a more costly instruction.
llvm-svn: 319175
Summary:
There's only a tablegen testcase for IntImmLeaf and not a CodeGen one
because the relevant rules are rejected for other reasons at the moment.
On AArch64, it's because there's an SDNodeXForm attached to the operand.
On X86, it's because the rule either emits multiple instructions or has
another predicate using PatFrag which cannot easily be supported at the
same time.
Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, igorb, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36569
llvm-svn: 315761
As noted in PR34080, a lot of x87 instructions alter the FPSW status register (or leave it in an undefined state) but aren't tagged as such in the tablegen.
This patch tags the control word, stack, wait and math instructions as altering FPSW, which matches what the AMD APMs suggests happens.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36414
llvm-svn: 312629
Craig Topper