For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360510
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360506
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure
llvm-svn: 360505
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360502
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360500
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360498
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360497
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360496
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360494
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360493
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360490
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360488
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360487
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360486
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360485
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360484
As requested in D58632, cleanup our red zone detection logic in the X86 backend. The existing X86MachineFunctionInfo flag is used to track whether we *use* the redzone (via a particularly optimization?), but there's no common way to check whether the function *has* a red zone.
I'd appreciate careful review of the uses being updated. I think they are NFC, but a careful eye from someone else would be appreciated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61799
llvm-svn: 360479
If a MachO section has the no-dead-strip attribute set then its atoms should
be preserved, regardless of whether they're public or referenced elsewhere in
the object.
llvm-svn: 360477
After D58632, we can create idempotent atomic operations to the top of stack.
This confused speculative load hardening because it thinks accesses should have
virtual register base except for the cases it already excluded.
This commit adds a new exclusion for this case. I'll try to reduce a test case
for this, but this fix was verified to work by the reporter. This should avoid
needing to revert D58632.
llvm-svn: 360475
We already updated the LegalizedNodes map at the end of the Expand call. This
would have marked the new node as being mapped to itself. So the LegalizeOp
call will find that an immediately return.
llvm-svn: 360472
Summary: Skip over prefetches when assigning debug info to instructions with memory operands. This way, the debug info is stable after instrumenting a binary with prefetches, allowing for iterative profiling and instrumentation.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: aprantl, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61789
llvm-svn: 360471
Split out from D61692 per RKSimon's suggestion. Vector op
legalization will automatically recursively legalize the returned
SDValue, but we need to take care of the other results ourselves.
Otherwise it will end up getting legalized only during op
legalization, by which point it might be too late (though I'm not
aware of any specific cases right now).
There are codegen differences because expansion occurs earlier now
and we don't get a DAGCombiner run in between.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61744
llvm-svn: 360470
Summary:
We hit undefined references building with ThinLTO when one source file
contained explicit instantiations of a template method (weak_odr) but
there were also implicit instantiations in another file (linkonce_odr),
and the latter was the prevailing copy. In this case the symbol was
marked hidden when the prevailing linkonce_odr copy was promoted to
weak_odr. It led to unsats when the resulting shared library was linked
with other code that contained a reference (expecting to be resolved due
to the explicit instantiation).
Add a CanAutoHide flag to the GV summary to allow the thin link to
identify when all copies are eligible for auto-hiding (because they were
all originally linkonce_odr global unnamed addr), and only do the
auto-hide in that case.
Most of the changes here are due to plumbing the new flag through the
bitcode and llvm assembly, and resulting test changes. I augmented the
existing auto-hide test to check for this situation.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits, steven_wu, wmi
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59709
llvm-svn: 360466
Follow up to r359122, after a bug was reported in it - the original
change too aggressively tried to move related types out of type units,
which included unnamed types (like array types) which can't reasonably
be declared-but-not-defined.
A step beyond that is that some types in type units can be anonymous, if
they are types with a name for linkage purposes (eg: "typedef struct { }
x;"). So ensure those don't get turned into plain declarations (without
signatures) because, lacking names, they can't be resolved to the
definition.
[Also include a fix for llvm-dwarfdump/libDebugInfoDWARF to pretty print
types in type units]
llvm-svn: 360458
This patch fixes the TreeEntry dangling pointer issue caused by reallocations of VectorizableTree.
Committed on behalf of @vporpo (Vasileios Porpodas)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61706
llvm-svn: 360456
The original change introduced a depth limit of 7 which caused a 22% regression
in the Swift MapReduceLazyCollection & Ackermann benchmarks. This new threshold
still ensures that the original test case doesn't hang.
rdar://50359639
llvm-svn: 360444
On PowerPC64 ELFv2 ABI, the top 3 bits of st_other encode the local
entry offset. A versioned symbol alias created by .symver should copy
the bits from the source symbol.
This partly fixes PR41048. A full fix needs tracking of .set assignments
and updating st_other fields when finish() is called, see D56586.
Patch by Alfredo Dal'Ava Júnior
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59436
llvm-svn: 360442
This fix allows the scheduler to take into account the number of instances of
each ProcResource specified. Previously a declaration in a scheduler of
ProcResource<1> would be treated identically to a declaration of
ProcResource<2>. Now the hazard recognizer would report a hazard only after all
of the resource instances are busy.
Patch by Jackson Woodruff and Momchil Velikov.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51160
llvm-svn: 360441
Add support for ".hidden" ".internal" ".protected" and " 0x%02x" for
other st_other bits used by some architectures.
Reviewed By: sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61718
llvm-svn: 360439
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40969
The functions findPotentiallyBlockedCopies and buildCopy are currently not
accounting for the presence of debug instructions. In the former this results
in the optimization not being trigerred, and in the latter results in
inconsistent codegen.
This patch enables the optimization to be performed in a debug build and
ensures the codegen is consistent with non-debug builds.
Patch by Chris Dawson.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61680
llvm-svn: 360436
If we only use the lower xmm of a ymm hop, then extract the xmm's (for free), perform the xmm hop and then insert back into a ymm (for free).
Fixes some of the regressions noted in D61782
llvm-svn: 360435
The test case checks were produced by the update_test_checks.py
scripts and I assumed that is sufficient. However, the behaviour
is different with different default target triples. Specify the
triple explicitly in the test case.
If this doesn't clean up the build bot breaks, I'll remove the test
case until I can get to the bottom of why the behaviour on build bots
is different from my machine.
llvm-svn: 360434
Craig Topper