For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360510
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360506
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure
llvm-svn: 360505
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360502
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360500
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360498
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360497
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360496
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360494
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360493
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360490
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360488
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360487
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360486
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360485
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360484
As requested in D58632, cleanup our red zone detection logic in the X86 backend. The existing X86MachineFunctionInfo flag is used to track whether we *use* the redzone (via a particularly optimization?), but there's no common way to check whether the function *has* a red zone.
I'd appreciate careful review of the uses being updated. I think they are NFC, but a careful eye from someone else would be appreciated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61799
llvm-svn: 360479
After D58632, we can create idempotent atomic operations to the top of stack.
This confused speculative load hardening because it thinks accesses should have
virtual register base except for the cases it already excluded.
This commit adds a new exclusion for this case. I'll try to reduce a test case
for this, but this fix was verified to work by the reporter. This should avoid
needing to revert D58632.
llvm-svn: 360475
Summary: Skip over prefetches when assigning debug info to instructions with memory operands. This way, the debug info is stable after instrumenting a binary with prefetches, allowing for iterative profiling and instrumentation.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: aprantl, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61789
llvm-svn: 360471
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40969
The functions findPotentiallyBlockedCopies and buildCopy are currently not
accounting for the presence of debug instructions. In the former this results
in the optimization not being trigerred, and in the latter results in
inconsistent codegen.
This patch enables the optimization to be performed in a debug build and
ensures the codegen is consistent with non-debug builds.
Patch by Chris Dawson.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61680
llvm-svn: 360436
If we only use the lower xmm of a ymm hop, then extract the xmm's (for free), perform the xmm hop and then insert back into a ymm (for free).
Fixes some of the regressions noted in D61782
llvm-svn: 360435
The current PIC model for WebAssembly is more like ELF in that it
allows symbol interposition.
This means that more functions end up being addressed via the GOT
and fewer directly added to the wasm table.
One effect is a reduction in the number of wasm table entries similar
to the previous attempt in https://reviews.llvm.org/D61539 which was
reverted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61772
llvm-svn: 360402
This also allows three op patterns to use increased constant bus
limit of GFX10.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61763
llvm-svn: 360395
The current lowering uses an mfence. mfences are substaintially higher latency than the locked operations originally requested, but we do want to avoid contention on the original cache line. As such, use a locked instruction on a cache line assumed to be thread local.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58632
llvm-svn: 360393
Summary:
The ".dword" directive is a synonym for ".xword" and is used used
by klibc, a minimalistic libc subset for initramfs.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, nickdesaulniers
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: nickdesaulniers, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61719
llvm-svn: 360381
As reported on PR39920, "slow horizontal ops" targets tend to internally expand to 2*shuffle+add/sub - so if we can reduce 2*shuffle+add/sub to a hadd/sub then we should do it - similar port usage but reduced instruction count.
This works out in most cases, although the "PR22377" regression in vector-shuffle-combining.ll is annoying - going from 2*shuffle+add+shuffle to hadd+2*shuffle - I've opened PR41813 to cover this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61308
llvm-svn: 360360
I've started this cleanup more several times now, but got sidetracked
elsewhere, e.g. by llvm-exegesis problems. Not this time, finally!
This is mainly cleaning up the inverse throughput values,
and a few latencies/uops, based on the llvm-exegesis measured values.
Though this is not complete by any means,
there's certainly more cleanup to be done.
The performance numbers (i've only checked by RawSpeed benchmark) aren't
really surprising - overall this *slightly* (< -1%) improves perf.
llvm-svn: 360341
Add an Argument that has the SExtAttr attached, as well as SIToFP
instructions, as values that generate sign bits. SIToFP doesn't
strictly do this and could be treated as a sink to be sign-extended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61381
llvm-svn: 360331
This code was never covered by tests, in PR41786 it was pointed out that
the deletion part doesn't work, and in a full Chrome build I was never
able to hit the code path that looks through copies. It seems the
situation it's supposed to handle doesn't actually come up in practice.
Delete it to simplify the code.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61671
llvm-svn: 360320
The VOP3 form should always be the preferred selection, to be shrunk
later. This should only be an optimization issue, but this partially
works around a problem from clobbering VCC when SIFixSGPRCopies
rewrites an SCC defining operation directly to VCC.
3 of the testcases are regressions from failing to fold the immediate
in cases it should. These can be avoided by improving the VCC liveness
handling in SIFoldOperands. Simply increasing the threshold to
computeRegisterLiveness works, although this is common enough that VCC
liveness should probably be tracked throughout the pass. The hack of
leaving behind an implicit_def instruction to avoid breaking iterator
wastes instruction count, which inhibits finding the VCC def in long
chains of adds. Doing this however exposes different, worse looking
regressions from poor scheduling behavior. This could probably be
avoided around by forcing the shrink of the addc here, but the
scheduler should probably be fixed.
The r600 add test needs to be split out because it asserts on the
arguments in the new test during the calling convention lowering.
llvm-svn: 360293
Summary:
Preserve MemorySSA in LoopSimplify, in the old pass manager, if the analysis is available.
Do not preserve it in the new pass manager.
Update tests.
Subscribers: nemanjai, jlebar, javed.absar, Prazek, kbarton, zzheng, jsji, llvm-commits, george.burgess.iv, chandlerc
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60833
llvm-svn: 360270
This was committed in rL358887 but reverted in rL360066 due to a x86 regression, really it should be have been pre-committed instead of being part of the SimplifyDemandedBits bitcast patch.
llvm-svn: 360263
Using SP in this position is unpredictable in ARMv7. CMP and CMN are not
affected, and of course v8 relaxes this requirement, but that's handled
elsewhere.
llvm-svn: 360242
Summary:
A COFF stub indirects the reference to a symbol through memory. A
.refptr.$sym global variable pointer is created to refer to $sym.
Typically mingw uses these for external global variable declarations,
but we can use them for weak function declarations as well.
Updates the dso_local classification to add a special case for
extern_weak symbols on COFF in both clang and LLVM.
Fixes PR37598
Reviewers: smeenai, mstorsjo
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61615
llvm-svn: 360207
Craig Topper