Reverting r208106 to reapply r208065 with a fix for the regression. The
issue was that the enum tried to be built even if the declaration hadn't
been constructed for debug info - presenting problems for enum templates
and typedefs of enums with names for linkage purposes.
Original commit message:
This regressed a little further 208055 though it was already a little
broken.
While the requiresCompleteType optimization should be implemented here.
Future (possibly near future) work.
llvm-svn: 208114
This regressed a little further 208055 though it was already a little
broken.
While the requiresCompleteType optimization should be implemented here.
Future (possibly near future) work.
llvm-svn: 208065
This is to make test cases looking for definitions more legible by
making the definition explicit rather than just the absence of '[fwd]'.
This allowed the debug-info-record tests to be rephrased - and in the
interests of reducing the number of individual test cases/invocations we
have, I merged them into one file, separated them with namespaces (&
then moved them to C++ because namespaces are great). If they need to
remain 'C' only tests, they can be moved back. (I didn't group them with
'debug-info-class.cpp' because these tests only apply to
-fno-limit-debug-info)
I removed the pieces of code that would cause these tests to pass under
-flimit-debug-info to ensure the tests remain relevant to their fixes
should we ever improve -flimit-debug-info to catch that kind of code.
This commit is version locked with the corresponding change to
DebugInfo.h in LLVM. Except some transient buildbot fallout.
llvm-svn: 184524
Mostly, try to depend on the annotation comments more so these tests are more
legible, brief, and agnostic to schema changes in the future (sure, they're not
agnostic to changes to the comment annotations but since they're easier to read
they should be easier to update if that happens).
llvm-svn: 177457
This addresses several (not all) debug info tests that use explicit metadata
numbers. Wherever the same number appeared more than once in a test I used
a named match to ensure the same number appeared in all those cases (this may
still be overly constraining test cases as they may not have actually cared
about that relationship). For one-off numbers I just replaced them with an
unnamed regex.
This may underconstrain poorly written test cases that were interested in
checking that certain metadata nodes were related but didn't actually match
on all the related nodes numbers.
llvm-svn: 174247
David Blaikie