Originally committed as r191661, but reverted because it changed the matching
order of comparisons on some hosts. That should have been fixed by r191735.
llvm-svn: 191738
Changing the diagnostic message for out of range branch targets in 191686 broke the tests.
The diagnostic message for out of range branch targets was changed to be more consistent with the other diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 191691
This patch adds Direct Object Emission support for I8 instructions: andi.b, bmnzi.b, bmzi.b, bseli.b, nori.b, ori.b, shf.{b,h,w} and xori.b.
Patch by Matheus Almeida
llvm-svn: 191688
This patch adds Direct Object Emission support for 2R instructions: nloc.{b,h,w}, nlzc.{b,h,w}, pcnt.{b,w,d}.
Patch by Matheus Almeida
llvm-svn: 191685
For some reason, adding definitions for these load and store
instructions changed whether some of the build bots matched
comparisons as signed or unsigned.
llvm-svn: 191663
Add VEX_LIG to scalar FMA4 instructions.
Use VEX_LIG in some of the inheriting checks in disassembler table generator.
Make use of VEX_L_W, VEX_L_W_XS, VEX_L_W_XD contexts.
Don't let VEX_L_W, VEX_L_W_XS, VEX_L_W_XD, VEX_L_W_OPSIZE inherit from their non-L forms unless VEX_LIG is set.
Let VEX_L_W, VEX_L_W_XS, VEX_L_W_XD, VEX_L_W_OPSIZE inherit from all of their non-L or non-W cases.
Increase ranking on VEX_L_W, VEX_L_W_XS, VEX_L_W_XD, VEX_L_W_OPSIZE so they get chosen over non-L/non-W forms.
llvm-svn: 191649
As specified in A8.8.72/A8.8.73/A8.8.74 in the ARM ARM, all variants of the ARM LDRD instruction have the following two constraints:
LDRD<c> <Rt>, <Rt2>, ...
(a) Rt must be even-numbered and not r14
(b) Rt2 must be R(t+1)
If those two constraints are not met the result of executing the instruction will be unpredictable.
Constraint (b) was already enforced, this commit adds support for constraint (a).
Fixes rdar://14479793.
llvm-svn: 191520
LDRD<c> <Rt>, <Rt2>, <label>
LDRD<c> <Rt>, <Rt2>, [<Rn>{, #+/-<imm>}]
LDRD<c> <Rt>, <Rt2>, [<Rn>], #+/-<imm>
LDRD<c> <Rt>, <Rt2>, [<Rn>, #+/-<imm>]!
As specified in A8.8.72/A8.8.73 in the ARM ARM, the T1 encoding has a constraint which enforces that Rt != Rt2.
If this constraint is not met the result of executing the instruction will be unpredictable.
Fixes rdar://14479780.
llvm-svn: 191504
CFE produces it to indicate artificial locations.
c.f.: DWARF standard, Table 6.2:
line -- An unsigned integer indicating a source line number. Lines are numbered beginning at 1. The compiler may emit the value 0 in cases where an instruction cannot be attributed to any source line.
llvm-svn: 191471
When asked to pad an irregular number of bytes, we should fill with
zeros. This is consistent with the behavior specified in the AIX
Assembler Language Reference as well as other LLVM and binutils
assemblers.
N.B. There is a small deviation from binutils' PPC assembler:
when handling pads which are greater than 4 bytes but not mod 4,
binutils will not emit any NOP sequences at all and only use zeros.
This may or may not be a bug but there is no excellent rationale as to
why that behavior is important to emulate. If that behavior is needed,
we can change writeNopData() to behave in the same way.
This fixes PR17352.
llvm-svn: 191426
This is the first set of instructions with a ".b" modifier thus we need to add the required code to disassemble a MSA128B register class.
Patch by Matheus Almeida
llvm-svn: 191415
In more detail, this patch adds the ability to parse, encode and decode MSA registers ($w0-$w31). The format of 2RF instructions (MipsMSAInstrFormat.td) was updated so that we could attach a test case to this patch i.e., the test case parses, encodes and decodes 2 MSA instructions. Following patches will add the remainder of the instructions.
Note that DecodeMSA128BRegisterClass is missing from MipsDisassembler.td because it's not yet required at this stage and having it would cause a compiler warning (unused function).
Patch by Matheus Almeida
llvm-svn: 191412
The binutils assembler supports a mode called DOLLAR_DOT which treats
the dollar sign token as a reference to the current program counter if
the dollar sign doesn't precede a constant or identifier.
This commit adds a new MCAsmInfo flag stating whether or not a given
target supports this interpretation of the dollar sign token; by
default, this flag is not enabled.
Further, enable this flag for PPC. The system assembler for AIX and
binutils both support using the dollar sign in this manner.
This fixes PR17353.
llvm-svn: 191368
Patch by Ana Pazos.
1.Added support for v1ix and v1fx types.
2.Added Scalar Pairwise Reduce instructions.
3.Added initial implementation of Scalar Arithmetic instructions.
llvm-svn: 191263
Summary:
LLVM would crash when trying to come up with a relocation type for
assembly like:
movabsq $V@TPOFF, %rax
Instead, we say the relocation type is R_X86_64_TPOFF64.
Fixes PR17274.
Reviewers: dblaikie, nrieck, rafael
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1717
llvm-svn: 191163
For some reason I never got around to adding these at the same time as
the signed versions. No idea why.
I'm not sure whether this SystemZII::BranchC* stuff is useful, or whether
it should just be replaced with an "is normal" flag. I'll leave that
for later though.
There are some boundary conditions that can be tweaked, such as preferring
unsigned comparisons for equality with [128, 256), and "<= 255" over "< 256",
but again I'll leave those for a separate patch.
llvm-svn: 190930
Summary:
We indicate that the object files are safe by emitting a @feat.00
absolute address symbol. The address is presumably interpreted as a
bitfield of features that the compiler would like to enable. Bit 0 is
documented in the PE COFF spec to opt in to "registered SEH", which is
what /safeseh enables.
LLVM's object files are safe by default because LLVM doesn't know how to
produce SEH handlers.
Reviewers: Bigcheese
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1691
llvm-svn: 190898
In particular, this means we emit non-external symbols defined to
variables, such as aliases or absolute addresses.
This is needed to implement /safeseh, and it appears there was some
confusion about what symbols to emit previously.
llvm-svn: 190888
Summary:
The '?' flag uses the last section group if the last had a section
group. We treat combining an explicit section group and the '?' as a
hard error.
This fixes PR17198.
Reviewers: rafael, bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1686
llvm-svn: 190768
Richard Sandiford