lvalues, nor can one take the address of an xvalue, by adding
appropriate static_cast's (in the first case) and a temporary (in the
second case).
llvm-svn: 124255
workaround relied on rvalue references binding to non-function
lvalues, while the original formulation (with std::forward) does the
right thing.
llvm-svn: 124241
With the current target revision of Clang libclangChecker no longer exists and
is not needed. Update the include path so we can get at ARM_DWARF_Registers.h
and friends.
llvm-svn: 124240
handling all CFGElement kinds. While writing
the test case, it turned out that return-noreturn.cpp
wasn't actually testing anything since it has the wrong -W
flag. That uncovered another regression with
the handling of destructors marked noreturn. WIP.
llvm-svn: 124238
for reference binding (C++ [over.rank.ics]p3b1sb4), so that we prefer
the binding of an lvalue reference to a function lvalue over the
binding of an rvalue reference. This change resolves the ambiguity
with std::forward and lvalue references to function types in a way
that seems consistent with the original rvalue references proposal.
My proposed wording for this change is shown in
isBetterReferenceBindingKind(); we'll try to get this change adopted
in the C++0x working paper as well.
llvm-svn: 124236
authors to write
class __attribute__((forbid_temporaries)) Name { ... };
when they want to force users to name all variables of the type. This protects
people from doing things like creating a scoped_lock that only lives for a
single statement instead of an entire scope.
The warning produced by this attribute can be disabled by
-Wno-forbid-temporaries.
llvm-svn: 124217
(C++0x [over.ics.rank]p3) when one binding is an lvalue reference and
the other is an rvalue reference that binds to an rvalue. In
particular, we were using the predict "is an rvalue reference" rather
than "is an rvalue reference that binds to an rvalue", which was
incorrect in the one case where an rvalue reference can bind to an
lvalue: function references.
This particular issue cropped up with std::forward, where Clang was
picking an std::forward overload while forwarding an (lvalue)
reference to a function. However (and unfortunately!), the right
answer for this code is that the call to std::forward is
ambiguous. Clang now gets that right, but we need to revisit the
std::forward implementation in libc++.
llvm-svn: 124216
generate meaningful [*] template argument location information.
[*] Well, as meaningful as possible, given that this entire code path
is a hack for when we've lost type-source information.
llvm-svn: 124211
NAKAMURA Takumi