As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
If we've already established an invariant scope with an earlier generation, we don't want to hide it in the scoped hash table with one with a later generation. I noticed this when working on the invariant-load handling, but it also applies to the invariant.start case as well.
Without this change, my previous patch for invariant-load regresses some cases, so I'm pushing this without waiting for review. This is why you don't make last minute tweaks to patches to catch "obvious cases" after it's already been reviewed. Bad Philip!
llvm-svn: 327655
This is a follow up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D43716 which rewrites the invariant load handling using the new infrastructure. It's slightly more powerful, but only in somewhat minor ways for the moment. It's not clear that DSE of stores to invariant locations is actually interesting since why would your IR have such a construct to start with?
Note: The submitted version is slightly different than the reviewed one. I realized the scope could start for an invariant load which was proven redundant and removed. Added a test case to illustrate that as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44497
llvm-svn: 327646
If we have an invariant.start with no corresponding invariant.end, then the memory location becomes invariant indefinitely after the invariant.start. As a result, anything dominated by the start is guaranteed to see the value the memory location had when the invariant.start executed.
This patch adds an AvailableInvariants table which tracks the generation a particular memory location became invariant and then uses that information to allow value forwarding that would otherwise be disallowed by potentially aliasing stores. (Reminder: In EarlyCSE everything clobbers everything by default.)
This should be compatible with the MemorySSA variant, but design is generational. We can and should add first class support for invariant.start within MemorySSA at a later time. I took a quick look at doing so, but probably need some input from a MemorySSA expert.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43716
llvm-svn: 327577
Summary:
Use MemorySSA, if requested, to do less conservative memory dependency
checking.
This change doesn't enable the MemorySSA enhanced EarlyCSE in the
default pipelines, so should be NFC.
Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, reames, majnemer
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19821
llvm-svn: 280279
Redundant invariant loads can be CSE'ed with very little extra effort
over what early-cse already tracks, so it looks reasonable to make
early-cse handle this case.
llvm-svn: 272954
Eric Christopher