Remove the stale LLDB-Info.plist which was only used by TestHelp.py. The
latter would try to parse the version number from the plist and use that
to verify the version in the help output. Of course this never matched
so it would fall back to matching any arbitrary version.
This patch does *not* change the real LLDB-Info.plist.in file which is
used for the LLDB Framework.
This patch updates `allocate_shared` to call `allocator_traits::construct`
when creating the object held inside the shared_pointer, and
`allocator_traits::destroy` when destroying it. This resolves
the part of P0674R1 that was originally filed as LWG2070.
This change is landed separately from the rest of P0674R1 because it is
incredibly tricky from an ABI perspective.
This is the reason why this change is so tricky is that we previously
used EBO in a compressed pair to store both the allocator and the object
type stored in the `shared_ptr`. However, starting in C++20, P0674
requires us to use Allocator construction for initializing the object type.
That requirement rules out the use of the EBO for the object type, since
using the EBO implies that the base will be initialized when the control
block is initialized (and hence we can't do it through Allocator construction).
Hence, supporting P0674 requires changing how we store the object type
inside the control block, which we do while being ABI compatible by using
some trickery with a properly aligned char buffer.
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR41900
Supersedes https://llvm.org/D62760
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91201
This reverts commit 0ebc1fb29f.
The behaviour should have been the same as before unless specifying CMAKE_BUILD_RPATH,
which was previously broken.
However, this seems to have broken builds for some people that don't specify it.
Reverting until I can investigate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94319
This was suggested to prepare for D93975.
By moving the start value creation to widenPHInstruction, we set the
stage to manage the start value directly in VPWidenPHIRecipe, which be
used subsequently to set the 'resume' value for reductions during
epilogue vectorization.
It also moves RdxDesc to the recipe, so we do not have to rely on Legal
to look it up later.
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94175
Bump the required SWIG version to 3. If my memory serves me well we last
bumped the required SWIG version to 2 for Python 3. At that time SWIG 3
had already been around for a while so everyone I know was already using
that.
It appears that SWIG 3 is the only version that officially supports
C++11 which we're using in the typemap. SWIG 3 was released in 2014 so I
think it's reasonable to make that the minimum required version.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48685
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94244
It's still a little confusing because in many cases C++17 and C++20
have different values, and libc++ implements the C++17 behavior but
not the C++20 behavior; 'unimplemented' can't represent that scenario.
Ultimately we probably ought to completely redesign the script to be
in terms of paper numbers, rather than language revisions, and make
it generate the CSV files like "Cxx2aStatusPaperStatus.csv" as well.
Most newly added macros are unimplemented. I've marked a few as implemented,
though, based on my reading of the code; for example I was pretty sure
`__cpp_lib_latch` is implemented since we have `<latch>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93830
Continue the convergence between LLVM dialect and built-in types by replacing
the bfloat, half, float and double LLVM dialect types with their built-in
counterparts. At the API level, this is a direct replacement. At the syntax
level, we change the keywords to `bf16`, `f16`, `f32` and `f64`, respectively,
to be compatible with the built-in type syntax. The old keywords can still be
parsed but produce a deprecation warning and will be eventually removed.
Depends On D94178
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, silvas, antiagainst
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94179
Similar to the Arm VCTP intrinsics, if the operands of an
active.lane.mask are both known, the constant lane mask can be
calculated. This can come up after unrolling the loops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94103
When printing QualType with qualifiers like "const", or pointing to an
elaborated type, we would print garbage like:
std::const std::vector<int>&
with the initial std:: being calculated correctly, but inserted in the
wrong place and the second std:: not removed (due to elaborated type).
This affected, among others, ExtractFunction and ExpandAuto tweaks.
This change introduces a new callback to PrintingPolicy, which allows us
to influence the printing of namespace qualifiers. In the future, the
same callback can be used to improve handling of "using namespace"
directives as well.
Fixes:
https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/640 (ExtractFunction)
https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/264 (ExpandAuto)
First point of https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/524
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94259
Use custom mlir runner init/destroy functions to safely init and destroy shared libraries loaded by the JitRunner.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94270
`wasm_rethrow_in_catch` intrinsic and builtin are used in order to
rethrow an exception when the exception is caught but there is no
matching clause within the current `catch`. For example,
```
try {
foo();
} catch (int n) {
...
}
```
If the caught exception does not correspond to C++ `int` type, it should
be rethrown. These intrinsic/builtin were renamed `rethrow_in_catch`
because at the time I thought there would be another intrinsic for C++'s
`throw` keyword, which rethrows an exception. It turned out that `throw`
keyword doesn't require wasm's `rethrow` instruction, so we rename
`rethrow_in_catch` to just `rethrow` here.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94038
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93911
This first step adds the assert statement and supports it at top level
and in record definitions. Later steps will support it in class
definitions and multiclasses.
This patch adds an attribute `inclusive` which if present causes
the upperbound to be included in the loop iteration interval.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94235
This patch renames PackStack and related variable names to also contain align across Clang.
As it is right now, Clang already uses one stack to record the information from both #pragma
align and #pragma pack. Leaving it as PackStack is confusing, and could cause people to
ignore #pragma align when developing code that interacts with PackStack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93901
Instead of checking explicitly checking for whether an op is usalbe
inside a `SpecConstantOperationOP`, this commit adds a new trait to
filter such ops.
Reviewed By: antiagainst
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94288
Support pack_f32p and pack_f32a intrinsic instructions and regression tests.
Reviewed By: simoll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94296
cfg-stackify-eh.ll contains many `CHECK` lines specifying label / catch
comments with numbers. These numbers are subject to change every time
any block/loop/try is added in the middle in existing functions or any
other function is added in the middle of the file, generating a large
number of lines in diffs. This change converts them to variables so they
can be more resistent to future changes.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94037
Started a new doc section about the OpenCL experimental
features and described ongoing work on C++ libraries
e.g. type traits.
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94188
This implements vp_add, vp_and for the VE target by lowering them to the
VVP_* layer. We also add helper functions for VP SDNodes (isVPSDNode,
getVPMaskIdx, getVPExplicitVectorLengthIdx).
Reviewed By: kaz7
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93766
As noted in PR48689, the verifier may have some kind
of exponential behavior that should be addressed
separately. For now, only run it in debug mode to
prevent problems for release+asserts.
That limit is what we had before D80401, and I'm
not sure if there was a reason to change it in that
patch.
FreeBSD did not provide the __atomic_* functions as part of the base
system until recently. They were added to libgcc_s in SVN revision r364753
(August 2020), so check for availability of 'non-lockfree-atomics' so that
these tests do not fail unexpectedly on older versions of FreeBSD.
This also removes the #ifndef __APPLE__ from atomic_helpers.h that was used
to work around lack of atomic runtime functions on older Apple platforms
and replaces it with XFAIL: !non-lockfree-atomics.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88818
This function is called by the __atomic_is_lock_free() builtin if the value
cannot be resolved to true at compile time. Lack of this function is
causing the non-lockfree atomics tests in libc++ to not be run (see D91911)
This function is also added in D85044, but that review also adds support
for using lock-free atomics in more cases, whereas this is a minimal change
that just adds __atomic_is_lock_free() for the implementation of atomic.c.
Reviewed By: ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92302
Clean ISel patterns for LSV and LVS before upstream more hand-written
ISel patterns.
Reviewed By: simoll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94291
Fixes a crash caused by D91255, when LLVMTy is null when
calling changeExtendedVectorElementType.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94234
This patch adds support for two new variants of the vectorize_width
pragma:
1. vectorize_width(X[, fixed|scalable]) where an optional second
parameter is passed to the vectorize_width pragma, which indicates if
the user wishes to use fixed width or scalable vectorization. For
example the user can now write something like:
#pragma clang loop vectorize_width(4, fixed)
or
#pragma clang loop vectorize_width(4, scalable)
In the absence of a second parameter it is assumed the user wants
fixed width vectorization, in order to maintain compatibility with
existing code.
2. vectorize_width(fixed|scalable) where the width is left unspecified,
but the user hints what type of vectorization they prefer, either
fixed width or scalable.
I have implemented this by making use of the LLVM loop hint attribute:
llvm.loop.vectorize.scalable.enable
Tests were added to
clang/test/CodeGenCXX/pragma-loop.cpp
for both the 'fixed' and 'scalable' optional parameter.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-November/067262.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89031
In the following loop:
void foo(int *a, int *b, int N) {
for (int i=0; i<N; ++i)
a[i + 4] = a[i] + b[i];
}
The loop dependence constrains the VF to a maximum of (4, fixed), which
would mean using <4 x i32> as the vector type in vectorization.
Extending this to scalable vectorization, a VF of (4, scalable) implies
a vector type of <vscale x 4 x i32>. To determine if this is legal
vscale must be taken into account. For this example, unless
max(vscale)=1, it's unsafe to vectorize.
For SVE, the number of bits in an SVE register is architecturally
defined to be a multiple of 128 bits with a maximum of 2048 bits, thus
the maximum vscale is 16. In the loop above it is therefore unfeasible
to vectorize with SVE. However, in this loop:
void foo(int *a, int *b, int N) {
#pragma clang loop vectorize_width(X, scalable)
for (int i=0; i<N; ++i)
a[i + 32] = a[i] + b[i];
}
As long as max(vscale) multiplied by the number of lanes 'X' doesn't
exceed the dependence distance, it is safe to vectorize. For SVE a VF of
(2, scalable) is within this constraint, since a vector of <16 x 2 x 32>
will have no dependencies between lanes. For any number of lanes larger
than this it would be unsafe to vectorize.
This patch extends 'computeFeasibleMaxVF' to legalize scalable VFs
specified as loop hints, implementing the following behaviour:
* If the backend does not support scalable vectors, ignore the hint.
* If scalable vectorization is unfeasible given the loop
dependence, like in the first example above for SVE, then use a
fixed VF.
* Accept scalable VFs if it's safe to do so.
* Otherwise, clamp scalable VFs that exceed the maximum safe VF.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen, fhahn, david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91718
We do this mostly to be able to test the insert_vector_elt isel
patterns. As long as we don't, most single element insertions show up as
`BUILD_VECTOR` in the backend.
Reviewed By: kaz7
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93759
Jonas Devlieghere