Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kate Stone b9c1b51e45 *** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style.  This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort.  Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit.  The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):

    find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
    find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;

The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.

Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit.  There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit.  YMMV.

llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-06 20:57:50 +00:00
Greg Clayton 5dbe5d4b62 Add correct file headers to all source files.
llvm-svn: 177625
2013-03-21 03:39:51 +00:00
Greg Clayton 7b8f738227 Code cleanup:
- don't use preprocessor macros
- use switch statements
- don't put anything in the lldb namespace, use "lldb_perf" namespace.
- Pass the action struct into each TestStep() for each step fill in
- Modify the ActionWanted class to have accessors to make the continue, next, finish, kill instead of using preproc macros

llvm-svn: 177332
2013-03-18 22:34:00 +00:00
Enrico Granata f58cececaa Initial checkin of a new project: LLDB Performance Testing Infrastructure
This is a very basic implementation of a library that easily allows to drive LLDB.framework to write test cases for performance

This is separate from the LLDB testsuite in test/ in that:
a) this uses C++ instead of Python to avoid measures being affected by SWIG
b) this is in very early development and needs lots of tweaking before it can be considered functionally complete
c) this is not meant to test correctness but to help catch performance regressions

There is a sample application built against the library (in darwin/sketch) that uses the famous sample app Sketch as an inferior to measure certain basic parameters of LLDB's behavior.
The resulting output is a PLIST much like the following:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
<plist version="1.0">
<array>
	<dict>
		<key>fetch-frames</key>
		<real>0.13161715522222225</real>
	</dict>
	<dict>
		<key>file-line-bkpt</key>
		<real>0.029111678750000002</real>
	</dict>
	<dict>
		<key>fetch-modules</key>
		<real>0.00026376766666666668</real>
	</dict>
	<dict>
		<key>fetch-vars</key>
		<real>0.17820429311111111</real>
	</dict>
	<dict>
		<key>run-expr</key>
		<real>0.029676525769230768</real>
	</dict>
</array>
</plist>

Areas for improvement:
- code cleanups (I will be out of the office for a couple days this coming week, but please keep ideas coming!)
- more metrics and test cases
- better error checking

This toolkit also comprises a simple event-loop-driven controller for LLDB, similar yet much simpler to what the Driver does to implement the lldb command-line tool.

llvm-svn: 176715
2013-03-08 20:29:13 +00:00