This seems to have been responsible for the XMM16-31 spills observed in PR29112. With this fixed the test case has been modified to no longer have a spill of XMM16.
llvm-svn: 283668
Summary:
When there is a call to an alias in the same module, we were not
adding a call edge. So we could incorrectly think that the alias
was dead if it was inlined in that function, despite having a
reference imported elsewhere. This resulted in unsats at link time.
Add a call edge when the call is to an alias.
Reviewers: davide, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25384
llvm-svn: 283664
Avoid generating indexed vector instructions for Exynos. This is needed for
fmla/fmls/fmul/fmulx. For example, the instruction
fmla v0.4s, v1.4s, v2.s[1]
is less efficient than the instructions
dup v2.4s, v2.s[1]
fmla v0.4s, v1.4s, v2.4s
Patch written by Abderrazek Zaafrani.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21571
llvm-svn: 283663
Introduce LIBCXX_LIBRARIES_PUBLIC in addition to LIBCXX_LIBRARIES that
holds 'public' interface libraries -- that is, libraries that both
libc++ links to and programs linked against it need to link to.
Currently this includes the ABI library and optionally -lunwind (when
LIBCXXABI_USE_LLVM_UNWINDER is on). The libraries are included in the
linker script, in order to make it possible to link C++ programs using
clang with compiler-rt runtime out-of-the-box.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25008
llvm-svn: 283659
Sanitizers are intentionally not including system headers and often declare slightly different function prototypes, which is incompatible with -fmodules and -fcxx-modules. Let’s simply exclude compiler-rt from using -fmodules.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25230
llvm-svn: 283658
Value names may be prefixed with a binary '1' to indicate that the
backend should not modify the symbols due to any platform naming
convention.
This should not show up in the YAML opt record file because it breaks
the YAML parser.
llvm-svn: 283656
Clang always emit a hash for ThinLTO, but as other frontend are
starting to use ThinLTO, this could be a serious bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25379
llvm-svn: 283655
We need to add an entry in the combined-index for modules that have
a hash but otherwise empty summary, this is needed so that we can
get the hash for the module.
Also, if no entry is present in the combined index for a module, we
need to skip it when trying to compute a cache entry.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25300
llvm-svn: 283654
This is the first step towards round-tripping symbol information,
and thusly being able to write symbol information to a PDB.
This patch writes the symbol information for each compiland to
the Yaml when running in pdb2yaml mode. There's still some loose
ends, such as what to do about relocations (necessary in order to
print linkage names), how to print enums with friendly names, and
how to give the dumper access to the StringTable, but this is a
good first start.
llvm-svn: 283641
Summary:
Move CheckCUDACall from ActOnCallExpr and BuildDeclRefExpr to
DiagnoseUseOfDecl. This lets us catch some edge cases we were missing,
specifically around class operators.
This necessitates a few other changes:
- Avoid emitting duplicate deferred diags in CheckCUDACall.
Previously we'd carefully placed our call to CheckCUDACall such that
it would only ever run once for a particular callsite. But now this
isn't the case.
- Emit deferred diagnostics from a template
specialization/instantiation's primary template, in addition to from
the specialization/instantiation itself. DiagnoseUseOfDecl ends up
putting the deferred diagnostics on the template, rather than the
specialization, so we need to check both.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, tra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24573
llvm-svn: 283637
Once MULHS was expanded, this exposed an issue where the condition
register was thought to be 16-bit. This caused an attempt to copy a
16-bit register to an 8-bit register.
Authored by Jake Goulding
llvm-svn: 283634
Summary:
To quote STL the problems with stack allocator are"
>"stack_allocator<T, N> is seriously nonconformant to N4582 17.6.3.5 [allocator.requirements].
> First, it lacks a rebinding constructor. (The nested "struct rebind" isn't sufficient.)
> Second, it lacks templated equality/inequality.
> Third, it completely ignores alignment.
> Finally, and most severely, the Standard forbids its existence. Allocators are forbidden from returning memory "inside themselves". This requirement is implied by the Standard's requirements for rebinding and equality. It's permitted to return memory from a separate buffer object on the stack, though."
This patch attempts to address all of those issues.
First, instead of storing the buffer inside the allocator I've change `stack_allocator` to accept the buffer as an argument.
Second, in order to fix rebinding I changed the parameter list from `<class T, size_t NumElements>` to `<class T, size_t NumBytes>`. This allows allocator rebinding
between types that have different sizes.
Third, I added copy and rebinding constructors and assignment operators.
And finally I fixed the allocation logic to always return properly aligned storage.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, howard.hinnant, STL_MSFT
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25154
llvm-svn: 283631
Because screen space is precious, if an optimization (vectorization, for
example) never happens, don't leave empty space for the associated markers on
every line of the output. This makes the output much more compact, and allows
for the later inclusion of markers for more (although perhaps rare)
optimizations.
llvm-svn: 283626
Summary:
If heap allocation of a coroutine is elided, we need to make sure that we will update an address stored in the coroutine frame from f.destroy to f.cleanup.
Before this change, CoroSplit synthesized these stores after coro.begin:
```
store void (%f.Frame*)* @f.resume, void (%f.Frame*)** %resume.addr
store void (%f.Frame*)* @f.destroy, void (%f.Frame*)** %destroy.addr
```
In those cases where we did heap elision, but were not able to devirtualize all indirect calls, destroy call will attempt to "free" the coroutine frame stored on the stack. Oops.
Now we use select to put an appropriate coroutine subfunction in the destroy slot. As bellow:
```
store void (%f.Frame*)* @f.resume, void (%f.Frame*)** %resume.addr
%0 = select i1 %need.alloc, void (%f.Frame*)* @f.destroy, void (%f.Frame*)* @f.cleanup
store void (%f.Frame*)* %0, void (%f.Frame*)** %destroy.addr
```
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25377
llvm-svn: 283625
This was caused by r281673, specifically changing `_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_TYPE_VIS`
from `__attribute__((__type_visibility__("default")))` to
`__attribute__((__visibility("default")))`.
I made that change because I thought the external instantiations needed
their members to have default visibility. However since libc++ never builds
with -fvisibility=hidden this appears not to be needed. Instead this change
caused previously hidden inline methods to become un-hidden, which is a regression.
This patch reverts the problematic change and fixes PR30642.
llvm-svn: 283620
The tail duplication pass uses an assumed layout when making duplication
decisions. This is fine, but passes up duplication opportunities that
may arise when blocks are outlined. Because we want the updated CFG to
affect subsequent placement decisions, this change must occur during
placement.
In order to achieve this goal, TailDuplicationPass is split into a
utility class, TailDuplicator, and the pass itself. The pass delegates
nearly everything to the TailDuplicator object, except for looping over
the blocks in a function. This allows the same code to be used for tail
duplication in both places.
This change, in concert with outlining optional branches, allows
triangle shaped code to perform much better, esepecially when the
taken/untaken branches are correlated, as it creates a second spine when
the tests are small enough.
Issue from previous rollback fixed, and a new test was added for that
case as well. Issue was worklist/scheduling/taildup issue in layout.
Issue from 2nd rollback fixed, with 2 additional tests. Issue was
tail merging/loop info/tail-duplication causing issue with loops that share
a header block.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18226
llvm-svn: 283619
The code used llvm basic block predecessors to decided where to insert phi
nodes. Instruction selection can and will liberally insert new machine basic
block predecessors. There is not a guaranteed one-to-one mapping from pred.
llvm basic blocks and machine basic blocks.
Therefore the current approach does not work as it assumes we can mark
predecessor machine basic block as needing a copy, and needs to know the set of
all predecessor machine basic blocks to decide when to insert phis.
Instead of computing the swifterror vregs as we select instructions, propagate
them at the end of instruction selection when the MBB CFG is complete.
When an instruction needs a swifterror vreg and we don't know the value yet,
generate a new vreg and remember this "upward exposed" use, and reconcile this
at the end of instruction selection.
This will only happen if the target supports promoting swifterror parameters to
registers and the swifterror attribute is used.
rdar://28300923
llvm-svn: 283617
Simon Pilgrim